From The Onion: "The Recording Industry Association
of America filed a $7.1 billion lawsuit against the nation's radio
stations Monday, accusing them of freely distributing copyrighted
music.
"'It's criminal,' RIAA
president Hilary Rosen said. 'Anyone
at any time can simply turn on a radio
and hear a copyrighted song. Making matters worse, these radio stations
often play the best, catchiest song off the album over and over
until people get sick of it. Where is the incentive for people to
go out and buy the album?'
"According to Rosen, the radio stations acquire copies
of RIAA artists' CDs and then broadcast
them using a
special transmitter, making it possible for anyone with a compatible
radio-wave receiver to listen to the songs.
"'These radio stations are extremely popular,' Rosen
said. 'They flagrantly string our songs
together in "uninterrupted music blocks" of up to 70 minutes
in length, broadcasting nearly one CD's worth of product without
a break, and they actually have the gall to allow businesses to
advertise between songs. It's bad enough that they're giving away
our music for free, but they're actually making a profit off this
scheme.'
"RIAA attorney Russell Frackman said the lawsuit is
intended to protect the artists.
"'If this radio trend continues, it will severely damage
a musician's ability to earn a
living off his music,' Frackman said. '[Metallica drummer] Lars
Ulrich [right] stopped in the other day wondering why
his last royalty check was so small, and I didn't know what to say.
How do you tell a man who's devoted his whole life to his music
that someone is able to just give it away for free? That pirates
are taking away his right to support himself with his craft?'..
"Continued Rosen: '...This has to be stopped before
the music industry's entire economic infrastructure collapses.'"
Read this entire article in The Onion, online here.
This article is satire. The first photo and caption are from
The Onion.
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
From Friday... BY KURT HANSON AND PAUL
MALONEY Today, as the webcasting industry, and Rep.
Sensenbrenner's office, await word of a royalty deal
that at this moment record
industry and Internet radio negotiators are trying to hammer out,
a new wrench may have been tossed into the works. And this one doesn't
come from the RIAA.
Commercial broadcasters, sources say, did not take part in
the negotiations, but may use their weight in Congress to prevent
a webcaster/label accord from becoming law.
On Tuesday, House Judiciary Chairman James Sensenbrenner's
(R-WI) H.R. 5469, which would have granted a six-month temporary
suspension of webcasting royalty payments, was removed from the
House voting schedule, following an outcry from House Democrats
and unions representing musicians (please see RAIN coverage
here).
In a meeting in his office, record industry and Net radio
negotiators told Sensenbrenner they could manage to craft a reasonable
deal by today. Sensenbrenner
promised he would try to introduce that deal to the House as legislation.
However, broadcasters (i.e.,
the NAB) aren't in on the
negotiations, and multiple reliable sources tell RAIN that
the NAB is telling its members that it will block
any agreement similar to the one being discussed from being passed
by the Senate.
...
... In fact, if the NAB were to bring its political might
to bear, it's possible that Sensenbrenner might not even be
able to get the agreement passed by the House.
On the other hand, before the developments of this week,
webcasters and the labels had discussed the idea of bringing
an agreement they reach to the U.S. Copyright Office, in the
hopes that it be made an addendum to the Librarian of Congress's
decision.
If the NAB blocks Sensenbrenner's plan, there's nothing
to prevent the parties involved from asking U.S. Register of
Copyrights Marybeth Peters
and Librarian of Congress Dr. James
Billington to add these new terms to the Librarian's
decision...or for the RIAA to offer the terms negotiated this
week to webcasters on a voluntary basis, as was the original
plan when the negotiations began. -- KH ...
From an RAB press release: "Radio revenue continues
on its positive course as total combined ad sales for August rose
5%.
Local sales figures for August increased 4% and national dollars
were up by 9% when compared to the same month a year ago.
"On a year-to-date basis, total combined ad dollars
showed a 3% gain for the first eight months of 2002. National sales
figures rose 7% and local dollars were up 2%...
"'Radio is showing signs of accelerated growth,' noted
President and Chief Executive Officer of RABGary Fries. 'All indicators
point to continued momentum with double-digit increases for 4th
Quarter. Radio is well-positioned to kick off 2003 from a strong
and stable vantage point.'"
From an InternetNews.com column by Gretchen Hyman: "It
was only a matter of time before congressionally imposed royalty
fees for Internet radio webcasters flushed
out the little guys and paved the way for big
media conglomerates.
"After awaiting their fate since June, 2002, when the
Librarian of Congress handed down a retroactive royalty fee structure
of 0.07 cents per listener per song, it is now up to the Recording
Industry Association of America to compromise
its hard-line stance and offer a reduced licensing fee.
"More likely than that happening, droves of small Internet
radio stations will be wiped off the cyber map in coming months under
the weight of millions of dollars in back royalty payments, and
only the wealthy, conglomerate-backed
music providers like Microsoft's Windowsmedia.com, ClearChannel, AOL's
Netscape radio site, MusicMatch, and Yahoo!'s Launchcast will dominate
the playing field.
"In keeping with the rapid changes and consolidation occurring
in the digital radio space, Vivendi
Universal Net USA and Radio
Free Virgin, part of the Virgin Group, inked a partnership
[RAIN coverage here]
Monday to launch customized radio channels on several of VUNet USA's
music network properties."
Read this entire column from InternetNews.com here.
... Here is a growing list of webcasters
who, because they don't feel they can manage webcasting royalties
in a viable business, have decided that it's in their best interests
to silence their streams. (We thank them for their hard work
and dedication to their audiences and the industry, and wish
them luck in their future endeavors...)
Have
we missed others? Use the feedback form above or e-mail
us here.
Other public
stations now off line
This is from the SOS:
Save Our Streams website, which focuses the struggle
against thewebcasting royalty rates as they pertain to independent
educational and noncommercial stations.