Please
scroll down (or click here)
for graphics and produced
public service announcements
you can use on your site or in your stream to encourage your
listeners to support HR 5469 (read details in today's issue).
BY KURT HANSON The
best hope for a thriving Internet radio industry which
would be good for consumers, broadcasters, webcasters, artists,
and even (although they may not be willing to publicly acknowledge
it) record labels is the bill that Rep.
James Sensenbrenner (R-WI, pictured at left), chairman
of the House Judiciary Committee, introduced yesterday (see story
below).
Because both webcasters and copyright
owners are dissatisfied with the rate decision and have filed
appeals in the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals, Sensenbrenner's bill
would suspend the deadline for CARP royalty
payments by six months, "providing both sides the
opportunity to have their day in court," he notes.
Without the passage of his bill, he observes, the industry
could become extinct before
the appeals have the chance to be heard in court! Broadcasters will
quit streaming, small webcasters will go bankrupt, and niche artists
will lose any chance of exposure of their music to the public.
How you can help: Because this bill is scheduled to come to the House floor
for a vote on Tuesday, the time to show your support of this bill
is today!
(1)
Identify your Congressman Look up the phone number
of the Washington, DC office of your representative in the House
of Representatives via the Congress.org website here:
(A) Type your ZIP code into the first box on the page. (B) If
necessary, use the form at the bottom of the next page to find
your nine-digit ZIP code. (C) Under the photo of your "Rep.,"
click the "info"
link.
(2) Call and ask for
the right person Ask to speak with "the legislative
aide in charge of Internet and copyright issues."
Learn his or her name. Explain that you're a constituent
i.e., you live or work in the Congressman's district.
(3) Ask for their support "I'm calling to urge you to support HR
5469 next week the bill that would prevent Internet
radio from being shut down
on October 20th. (It will be up for a vote on Tuesday.) As you
probably know, the CARP process was a total failure. Both
copyright owners and webcasters are unhappy with the
decision. This bill would postpone the CARP decision for six months
so that both sides can have
time to have their appeals heard in the Court of Appeals."
(4) Add personal insight Talk about how the CARP decision affects you
as a small businessperson and/or a listener. Mention the great
Internet radio stations we've already lost (Entercom
stations, smaller-market Clear Channel stations, SOMA FM, free
KPIG, etc.).Mention the new artists
you've discovered and the CDs
you've purchased thanks to Internet radio. And make sure they
understand the difference
between Internet radio and peer-to-peer download services like
Napster they're totally different! ("Napster bad (maybe)!
Internet radio good!")
(5) Ask for a commitment Offer to leave your number if they have any questions.
If they're noncommittal, ask if you can call back on Monday to
see what they've decided. In the unlikely event that your Congressman's
aide is unfamiliar with the bill or needs a copy, feel free to
point them here (or simply download the Adobe Acrobat file yourself
and e-mail it to them):
If time permits, you could repeat this
process for the Congressman from the district in which
you work, from the district in
which you grew up (especially if, say, your parents live there and
are voters), from a district in which you know you have listeners,
etc.
Now
send a fax, too! Another way to communicate your message is to use the automated
fax system Lightningcast has
prepared: http://www.broadcastpromotions.net/carp/hr5469/.
One simply needs to supply one's name, address, and nine-digit ZIP
code, and a "personalized" fax with all the relevant information
is sent to the appropriate Congressman.
Later today, if you're a webcaster or broadcaster, you can
also ask your listeners to help.
Please scroll down to find banner ads and PSAs (or links to such)
near the bottom of today's issue. And we've revised the home page
of SaveInternetRadio.org.
Finally, let us know how you're doing! Drop us a line to
feedback@kurthanson.com
or use the feedback form lower on this page. Thanks!
...
... Obvious question: Will artists suffer
from this proposed six-month delay? The answer is, essentially,
no.
Let's do the math: Total Internet radio listening this
month is roughly 40 million hours. At the midpoint of the period
during which retroactive royalties are due, it might have been
20 million hours. Multiplied by four years, that's about 1 billion
hours of listening or about 15 billion
"performances." At $.0007/performance (ignoring
the fact that some webcasters owe the lower noncommercial rate),
that's $10.5 million. I would guess 1/3 of that will be uncollectable
(because the webcasters would be bankrupted by the CARP decision),
leaving $7 million. Half of that is supposed to go to artists,
or $3.5 million, less SoundExchange
administration costs.
I would estimate that about 1/3 of Internet radio airplay
goes to the 500 or so successful, big-name
artists (e.g., Britney Spears, the Rolling Stones,
Coldplay, etc.) who have million-selling albums and other revenue
streams and for whom a delay in receiving a check for $2,333
less SoundExchange administrative costs would not be a major
hardship.
More importantly, the balance would be divided up among
the 10,000 or so other artists who get airplay on Internet radio
and for whom SoundExchange administers royalties. The average
one-time-only check would be $233
less SoundExchange administrative costs, representing royalties
of about $4.86/month for
48 months.
Yes, it would be a shame if a delay in receiving this
one-time $233-less-adminstrative-costs check hurts these artists,
but there are two points to consider: (1) This is happening
because their interests are not being
well-represented in the record industry's negotiations
with webcasters. There were months
of negotiations that could have led to a compromise royalty
agreement for small webcasters; the continued failure of those
negotiations is what led to this bill. (2) If I were
an artist that wasn't getting
significant AM or FM airplay but was
getting exposure on Internet radio, I know I'd be willing to
postpone the receipt of that $233-less-adminstrative-costs check
if I knew that the tradeoff for receiving that check was that
outlets for my music were going to be bankrupted and shut down.
-- KH ...
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
Various
professionals from the Internet radio industry are contributing
their talent and efforts to build a storehouse of resources to support
Rep. Sensenbrenner's "Relief
for Small-Business Webcasters" bill. These various graphic
and audio files are intended to be shared by the industry, and used
by anyone who'd like to encourage support of the bill.
Here are a "banner" and a "tile" for use
on your site (courtesy of IRH-Live's
Rabbett). He links them to
his info page here, but the text on the images is such that they could
link to any info page (such as SaveInternetRadio.org).
The voice of iM Networks
and "Best of Planet" programmer
Bone Mama (above right) has voiced a 60-second, 128
kbps MP3 public service announcement (PSA), available here.
Another excellent 60-second PSA (this one a 160 kbps MP3
produced by Rabbett) is here
(text of the copy is here).
If you are a graphic artist, voice talent, producer, etc.,
and would like to contribute your work to the effort, please let
us know about it so we can link to it. Send e-mail to paul@kurthanson.com.
We'd love to be able to share it. Thanks!
From today's early
edition of RAIN: BY PAUL MALONEY Late
yesterday afternoonRAIN learned that Rep.
James Sensenbrenner (R-WI, pictured), chairman of the
House Judiciary Committee, introduced a bill that would impose a
six-month moratorium on webcasting
royalty fees, so that small webcasters don't go out of business
before their appeals can be heard in court.
House of Representatives bill 5469, called "Relief for
Small-Business Webcasters," is summarized in the notice below,
sent out by the Judiciary Committee office to Congress and obtained
by RAIN through that office.
According to a spokesman from the Judiciary Committee office,
the bill will likely come to the House floor on Tuesday.
Relief for Small-Business
Webcasters
Support H.R. 5469
September 27, 2002
Dear Colleague:
I have introduced H.R.5469, a bill to help webcasters (Internet
radio broadcasters) remain in business while they are resolving
a commercial dispute with record companies. If
my bill is not enacted prior to October 20, these small businesses
will be forced to shut down even though
their case is still onappeal.
By way of background, the "Digital Millennium Copyright Act,"
which Congress passed in 1998, permitted webcasters to purchase
a "compulsory license"
to operate by paying copyright owners a fee, negotiated privately
or set by an arbitration panel, for the performance of music.
After industry negotiations failed, the Copyright Office convened
an arbitration panel called a "CARP" to determine
the rate. The CARP issued its rate-making decision, which
was later rejected by the Librarian of Congress pursuant to
his authority under the Copyright Act. The Librarian's final
decision, released on June 20, lowered the CARP rate further.
Webcasters and copyright owners are
still dissatisfied and have appealed
to the DC Circuit for relief.
Since the Librarian's decision is slated to take effect on
October 20, and the Court of Appeals has yet to set a trial
schedule, the webcasting industry
that Congress sought to nurture in 1998 may
become extinct before the litigation officially ends. H.R.
5469 solves this problem by staying the implementation of
the decision for six months, providing
both sides the opportunity to have their day in court.
It is only fair that private parties be allowed to pursue
all legal remedies available to them before judgment is imposed.
Promote fairness and support small businesses vote
for H.R. 5469.
F. JAMES SENSENBRENNER, JR.
Chairman, Committee on the Judiciary
...
... Note the "small business" angle Sensenbrenner
takes in his notice (though regardless of the title, it appears
this measure will "stay the implementation of the decision"
for all webcasters, regardless
of size).
Sensenbrenner is a noted small business advocate (Wednesday
he was presented with the 2002 ‘Guardian of Small Business’
Award from the National Federation of Independent Business,
the largest small-business advocacy group in the U.S.).
Also note the phrase "the webcasting industry that
Congress sought to nurture in 1998 may become extinct..."
This is interesting for two reasons.
First, it shows Sensenbrenner understands the gravity
of the situation for small webcasters.
But perhaps just as importantly he reinforces the idea
of that the CARP process is faulty. That is, that the final
determination on webcast royalty fees served to accomplish exactly
the opposite of what Congress intended in passing the DMCA.
-- PM ...
BY PAUL MALONEY US Reps. Jay Inslee (D-WA) and
Rick Boucher (D-VA) released a
joint press statement commending Rep. James Sensenbrenner
on his introduction of the "Relief for Small-Business Webcasters"
bill. In their comments, both criticized the arbitration process that
led to the royalty determination. Likewise, both urged colleagues
to support the bill.
Said Inslee (pictured right), "I applaud Chairman Sensenbrenner
for recognizing the urgent need to stay the imminent execution of
Internet radio and give both sides a chance to work out a fair, equitable
solution. The October 20 deadline would have pulled the plug on Internet
radio and shut down a service that provides thousands of listeners
with diverse musical genres and an extraordinary range of artists
that do not get radio airplay.
"Clearly, the arbitration process is severely
broken by faulty standards,
and the current royalty structure is not fair.
I will continue to urge my colleagues in the House of Representatives
to support fundamental changes to the law that has created this problem."
Boucher (left) added, "I want to commend the Chairman for taking
this important step in averting the detrimental effects of the October
20th payment deadline. For thousands of Internet radio providers who
are providing diverse musical programming to consumers via the Internet,
the tortured webcasting CARP proceeding
made real many of the obstacles in copyright law that I have been
actively trying to remedy.
"This is a necessary measure at this time for saving
from certain shutdown thousands of small businesses and Internet radio
webcasters who legally offer music listening services. I applaud the
Chairman's introduction of this measure and urge my colleagues in
the House and the Senate to act quickly and support this measure
before Internet radio providers must pay a highly disputed retroactive
royalty payment."
... Here is a growing list of webcasters
who, because they don't feel they can manage webcasting royalties
in a viable business, have decided that it's in their best interests
to silence their streams. (We thank them for their hard work
and dedication to their audiences and the industry, and wish
them luck in their future endeavors...)
Have
we missed others? Use the feedback form above or e-mail
us here.
Other public
stations now off line
This is from the SOS:
Save Our Streams website, which focuses the struggle
against thewebcasting royalty rates as they pertain to independent
educational and noncommercial stations.