Daily news and commentary on the key issues involving radio and the Internet    
     


Welcome!
Contact RAIN
Feedback form

Hanson Consulting



Proposed
  recordkeeping
  requirements
CARP recommends
   flat-rate royalty
CARP based rate
  on Yahoo! deal
"Day of Silence"
   is on!
20 House members
   write Librarian
Media coverage of
   "Day of Silence"
Copyright Office
  roundtable
House Judiciary
   subcommittee
   hearing
"RIAA may win
  battle but..."
CARP rejected!
Royalty rates
  around world
"Likely" record-
   keeping rules
Senate hearing on
   CARP process
Librarian's decision:
  $.0007/perf.
Congressmen
  weigh response
Mark Cuban's
  e-mail to RAIN
KH analysis of
  Cuban e-mail
Yahoo halts
  Broadcast.com
  streams
VOW petitions
  Congress
Million Fax March
Labels to Net Radio:
  Die now
NAB legal appeal
KPIG drops streaming
Small webcasters
  benefit concert
Internet Radio
  Fairness Act
Artemis Records to
  allow free streaming
Webcasters, labels
  appeal LOC ruling

Librarian wants to
  block some appeals


Past issues
Site reviews
Guest essays
Metrics analysis

Copyright Law
DMCA



August 2002:
Channels / Networks
July 2002:
Channels / Networks
June 2002:
Channels / Networks


Recent weeklies:
Week of September 9
Week of September 2
Week of August 26
Week of August 19
Week of August 12
Week of August 5
Monthlies:
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002

Click here to make RAIN your default homepage!


We'll send you a brief daily summary of each day's stories with a clickable link to the RAIN home page.

 

 

RAIN exclusive
How Clear Channel/Orlando is making money with streaming
BY KURT HANSON
It's now starting to happen in various markets across the country that radio station clusters are actually making money from their Internet initiatives. And some of them are even doing it with their simulcast streams!

One example of such a success story is the seven-station Clear Channel cluster in Orlando, FL -- WTKS, XL 106.7, Real Rock 101.1, Magic 107, Cool 100 FM, 740 The Team, and 540 WFLA -- where they're using the power of their local sales forces to sell Internet spot schedules to local advertisers, according to the cluster's Internet Marketing Manager Jeff Bosworth (pictured below).

The approach that is working, Bosworth says, is to (1) conduct a thorough "needs analysis" with the prospective advertiser, (2) design a custom-written in-stream spot with a coordinated banner, a custom-built "bridge page" that the banner links to, and a very specific call-to-action within the spot, (3) set realistic client expectations, and (4) present a comprehensive report at the end of the campaign to document its success and suggest improvements for future campaigns.

Advertisers aren't buying Internet,
they're buying RADIO

"Streaming for me
is just the best thing since sliced bread," Bosworth told RAIN. "Streaming is radio, is what it is. It's not 'Internet,' it's 'radio!'

"Listeners are listening to the radio," he reiterates, "they're just listening over a different mechanism. And as a result we have a whole new set of inventory to sell." Clear Channel uses Hiwire to replace the broadcast station's spots with the Internet-only spots for about 200 of its stations.

Bosworth says that salespeople can sell Internet-only spot schedules either as an add-on to broadcast schedules or, alternatively, to a potential advertiser who has too small a budget for the cluster's broadcast stations: "For those accounts that don't necessarily have $5-$10-$15,000 to spend on a [broadcast] campaign, they're able to bundle this in...or sell this to a new advertiser that doesn't have the largest budget in the world. To get a customer and to substantiate a return, it's very, very simple.

"But, again, we don't run any broadcast spots over the Internet. Instead, we create Internet streaming-only spots, and we develop a call to action, to click. We always run a coordinated banner. We put the same call to action in that spot, and the goal here is to drive the customer to click. That is the goal. If we can get them to click, then we can substantiate the return, because we drive them to something that we've created together -- the bridge page. So they know where it's coming from!

"Each one is different because of the objective of what the client wants. We try to develop a campaign that's going to produce a return for them. It's unlikely that we'd link to a client's website directly -- we build a lot of bridge pages, we write a lot of copy, we write a lot of calls to action which we develop with the clients -- to create the perception that our listeners will get some sort of a deal.

Example: Images Car Care
"Let's take Images Car Care, for example. He'll send you a coupon for a free car wash, but he's really got two goals -- to get your e-mail address and to get you to his car wash. Once he gets you there, he'll try to upsell you.

"This particular package, he gets rotators on the radio stations, running 6A to 6A, which drive people to our websites. That helps us get our traffic up on our sites, but it actually benefits everybody -- our listeners get something free, our website traffic goes up, and our advertiser gets a return. He's been on for almost a year and he does 125 to 250 coupons a week.

"It's a 'win-win' all the way around!

"And our AEs have been very, very aggressive about finding clients. If they're out on a call and the prospect doesn't have that huge budget, this is like a trump card. Of course, their main focus is to sell the stations — we're in the radio business — but they've got this in their back pocket."

"Bridge pages" help salespeople
substantiate a campaign's success

Bosworth notes, "I love this streaming business,
because I can go back to the customer every time and substantiate their business as soon as the campaign is coming to an end. I fill out a form to substantiate it and to make suggestions on how to make it better.

"The problem with website advertisers is that a lot of the time they have a website, but there's nothing there that they can prove they got a return because somebody stopped by their website. There's no call to action on their website.

"So that concerns me -- if I drive a customer to their site and there's no way for the customer to substantiate that Clear Channel sent them a number of customers to do business with them; then I'm not going to have a recurring customer."

Of course, there's a solution: If the "bridge page" (see Lipstick Depot example above) has traffic that could only have come from the on-stream spot schedule, it's easy for the salesperson to document how effective the campaign was.

Currently 15 to 18 recurring clients
at up to $.04 to $.05 per impression

"We've got a about 15 to 18 recurring clients
on right now," Bosworth says, "and we're always looking for more. I've got a lipstick lady on Magic and Cool and a horseback-riding company on another one with a different demo. Campaigns run a for month, but the campaigns are based on impressions, so they run out when they run out. And selling at $.04 to $.05 per impression is what I'm trying to concentrate on.

"But I'm not trying to sell this as an Internet product -- I'm trying to sell this as a RADIO product. A P-1 listener is listening to the radio and our advertisers are buying radio. It just happens that a piece of it is the Internet -- the banner and the bridge page, so people can see more information.

Bosworth notes that 1/3 to 1/2 of the spots are local,
with the rest sold by Hiwire or Clear Channel Radio Interactive sales. He says that on some stations' streams, some advertisers may be on every single break because they want the frequency.

"We had one client who bought 75,000 impressions per month on a quarterly deal, for three months, but we only served 42,000 in the first month, so we just moved a lot of that over to the next month and threw another station in there.

Bosworth, who was a station client for several years (he owned an ISP (Internet Service Provider)) before he joined Clear Channel about a year ago, concludes, "I think it's wonderful because it's radio -- it's just over a different piece of machinery."

...
...
Much of the concern over revenues in our industry has been about the slow development of a significant market for national Internet radio spot sales.

However, local radio spots have always sold for significantly higher CPMs and CPPs than national and network radio spots.

Plus which, local advertisers, as opposed to, say, national media buyers, really care about advertising effectiveness -- i.e., making the cash register ring -- and are in a position to watch and judge that effectiveness.

Clearly, broadcast stations
have a leg up here over Internet-only webcasters. Broadcasters have got listeners who want to listen to their programming on their computers (e.g., in office buildings with bad reception). They've got salespeople with relationships with advertisers. And by comparison to broadcast schedules, adding some Internet elements to a buy is a relatively affordable upsell!

Finally, broadcasters who don't stream (Infinity, etc.)
should note that if CCU sells only one spot per hour at their target pricing, they have probably already covered most, if not all, of their streaming and royalty costs! -- KH
...
This is #3 in a series of recent RAIN articles on broadcasters' success. (See interviews with CCRI's John Martin and Clear Channel/Cleveland's Jim Varga here and here.) If you've got a success story you'd like to share, e-mail us here or use the feedback form below.



Cluster uses streaming ad, banner to reach potential clients
BY PAUL MALONEY
The Clear Channel/Orlando station group is hoping to hook customers for its Internet advertising the same way those potential advertisers would land customers of their own.

The banner shown and an accompanying audio ad (in MP3 format here) run in available advertising slots that haven't been sold.



Clicking on the banner takes the potential advertisers to a page where he or she can learn more about the broadcaster's streaming ad program. The spot explains that an advertiser's banner and commercial can be seen and heard by "tens of thousands of Clear Channel Orlando listeners. Pretty cool, huh?"
 

[an error occurred while processing this directive]

 

Webcasters lobby lawmakers to delay or adjust music royalties
From today's Wall Street Journal: "Internet-radio companies are ramping up a fight to avoid music royalties they will owe record labels beginning Oct. 20, but so far it isn't clear if they will be able to head off the federally mandated payments.

"Online radio companies lobbied Thursday on Capitol Hill to urge Congress to delay or adjust the royalties, which they argue are too high for a new medium and could force smaller Webcasters to shut down. They also are going to court to appeal the rates, which were set in June by the Librarian of Congress...

"The music firms have been negotiating with Webcasters to work out a compromise, potentially including a special royalty structure that would allow smaller firms to pay fees based on a percentage of their revenue, rather than a per-song charge. So far, according to people with knowledge of the matter, the continuing talks haven't produced a deal...

"Some Internet radio firms and broadcasters have shut down their Webcasts, at least in part because of the upcoming royalty payment. 'It was purely an economic decision,' said Clarke Brown, chief executive of the radio operations of Jefferson-Pilot Corp. The company had been streaming 15 of its 17 stations online, but shut them down because of the royalty.

"A bill introduced in July in the House of Representatives would change the rate-setting process and ease the payments of smaller Webcasters, but there isn't yet a companion bill in the Senate. The House bill doesn't yet have a hearing scheduled, though its supporters are working to set one up..."

Read this story in today's Wall Street Journal, or if you subscribe, read it online here.

...
...
As shown in today's lead story in RAIN, commercial broadcasters are in a position to make money with Internet radio either right now or very soon.

Small independent webcasters
and non-commercial stations, however, are in a much different position.

They're the operators
who are providing the exciting diversity of Internet radio -- giving exposure to dozens of music formats and thousands of artists who can't get exposure on AM and FM radio any more.

And they're about to get wiped out if Congress doesn't fix the mistake it made in the CARP legislation -- and if the record industry doesn't offer a voluntary compromise solution to save them! -- KH
...
 


Have an opinion? Drop us a note! (Or, to use your own e-mail software, click here.)

  Your e-mail address:
  Your name (if not obvious from your e-mail address):
    Kurt and Paul, this is deep background -- don't quote me!

        Thanks!

 

 
 

Reader feedback

"Reward is always greater than what is given up..."


I heard a new series on our local NPR station (KNPR) this morning about music & technology ["TechnoPop The Secret History of Technology and Pop Music" here].

To paraphrase one of the last statements of this week's installment... "historically, as artists and music companies have given up certain things (rights?), the reward is always greater than what is given up..." I really think this program is pro-technology/streaming/MP3. First installment was this week and will be, I believe, six weeks long. Definitely a great listen!

  Ken Linder


This feedback is in reference to yesterday's story on the Philips Internet radio device here...

"There is no certainty that I can even listen..."


Since this whole mess with the RIAA has gotten attention, I am no longer able to get some of the college radio stations I have been listening to for years. It was nice while it lasted. But I won't be buying an Internet boombox as long as there is no certainty that I can even listen.

  Gregg Kuljian



"Ideas when shared are multiplied..."


The RIAA is NOT acting in the best interests of artists, their fans, or listeners curious about new sounds, just greedy corporations. Copyright law has been perverted beyond its original intent to promote creativity and new ideas, instead to suppress it for the benefit of concentrated-wealth fiefdoms.

Previous concepts on what is "property" vs. "speech" are coming to a head in the digital age. Are consumers purchasing the "speech" or the vehicle it is delivered on? When the vehicle can offer near infinite volume and diversity without diminishing its mass, then nothing is lost. Property when shared is divided. Ideas when shared are multiplied.

  R. Michael Sullivan



...
Silenced by royalties

Here is a growing list of webcasters who, because they don't feel they can manage webcasting royalties in a viable business, have decided that it's in their best interests to silence their streams. (We thank them for their hard work and dedication to their audiences and the industry, and wish them luck in their future endeavors...)
247PolkaHeaven.com All80s.com AudioCandy.com
BlueMars.org BrazilCast 1 & 2 Celtic Heritage Webradio
Chez Whitey CIRNH.com Citadel stations
Clownmask Radio Entercom stations Gleiser Communications
Good Time Oldies Radio Greater Media stations GrrlRadio
HitRadio.biz Hot Hit Radio IdahosCast.com
Ithaca College Radio Jones College Radio KBCS/Bellevue
KBVR/Corvallis KDFC/San Francisco KEDM/Monroe
KEOM/Mesquite KETR/Commerce KGRK/Cedar Falls
KHUM/Humboldt. Co. KKDV/San Francisco KKNX/Eugene
KKNG/Oklahoma City KKPT/Little Rock KKUP/Cupertino
KMGO/Centerville KNHC/Seattle KOIT/San Francisco
KOKF/Oklahoma City KOMA/Oklahoma City KPIG/Freedom
KRCL/Salt Lake City KROK/DeRidder KTPW/Dallas
KTRS/St. Louis KTXN/Victoria KVVP/Leesville
KUMX/South Fort Polk KWXY/Cathedral City Lotus Radio stations
Maranatha stations McClure stations Midwest Family stations
Minion Radio MonkeyRadio.org MoreMusicRadio.net
MYNDFK.com NetRockRadio.com NextMedia stations
OnTheCorner.fm Perkigoth.com PissMonkey
Powerrocks.com Progrock.com Psychedelic Time Warp
Pulverradio.com RadioAmerica RadioBoston.com
RadioCentral.com RadioMAX Radio Free Akron
Radio Free BD Radio Free Tiny Pineapple Radio Isla Negra
ReggaeTrain.com Renda Broadcasting RKNA: Aural Arcana
SavageRockRadio.com Shwango Radio Simmons Media stations
SomaFM.com StarDogRadio.com TagsTrance.com
The City Radio The Lost 45s The Radio People stations
therockfm.com TheVoice The Zoo
UCLARadio.com WAAF/Worcester Waitt Radio Network
WAME/Statesville WBEB/Philadelphia WCKW/La Place
WDCE/Richmond WDWN/Auburn WellsRadio.net
WELW/Cleveland WEST/Easton WEZS/Laconia
WGQR/Elizabethtown WIYY/Baltimore WJTL/Lancaster
WLUP/Chicago WMHB/Waterville WMMR/Philadelphia
WOVRadio.com WRLT/Nashville WRSI/Greenfield
WRUR/Rochester WRVG/Georgetown WSBF/Clemson
WSWI/Evansville WUVT/Blacksburg WVKR/Poughkeepsie
WXRV/Haverhill WYYB/Phoenix WZBC/Newton
WZIP/Akron WZMR/Albany Yahoo! Radio stations
Have we missed others? Use the feedback form above or e-mail us here.

Other public stations now off line
This is from the SOS: Save Our Streams website, which focuses the struggle against thewebcasting royalty rates as they pertain to independent educational and noncommercial stations.
KAPU-CA; KSDS-CA; KTAI-TX; KTSW-TX; KWJC-MO; KXCI-AZ; KXRJ-AR; WEBR-VA; WERS-MA; WEVL-TN; WMHW-MI; WMUA-MA; WNYU-NY; WONB-OH; WPTS-PA; WRMC-VT; WSRN-PA; WSTB-OH; WSUM-WI; WSUW-WI; WUTK-TN; WXOU-MI
 
Upcoming conferences
Sep. 26-Oct. 6, 2002 Museum of Television & Radio 8th Annual Festival:
New York, NY
Oct. 1-4, 2002 Streaming Media East: New York, NY
Oct. 20-22, 2002 NAB European Radio Conference: Prague, Czech Republic
Oct. 30-Nov. 2, 2002 CMJ Music Marathon 2002: New York, NY

 

Search RAIN

(Hint: Use quotes)
Advanced Search




Publications
R&R
RBR
Radio Ink
All Access
Inside Radio
   

Internet Pubs.
Red Herring
Business 2.0
   
Other Publications
(was eRadio)
(Taz Media)
FMQB
   

Software for RAIN's daily e-mail reminders provided by:

 



 
 

TOP

Copyright 2003, RAIN Publications, Inc. All rights reserved.
All logos and trademarks are property of their respective owners.

Your RAIN staff
Kurt Hanson
Publisher
Paul Maloney
Editor
Ralph Sledge
"Site of the Day" Editor
David Don
Developer
Brad Knutson
Intern
Ben Huh
Project Manager