We
hope to see you this week in Seattle for the NAB.
Please join us for our RAIN Reader Cocktail
Party, Friday 5-7p at the Gordon
Biersch Brewery Restaurant. It's in the Pacific
Place shopping mall, just one block west of the main
convention hotel, the Sheraton (click the link for directions).
Hope you can make it!
BY PAUL MALONEY According
to a press release from the office of U.S. Rep.
Jay Inslee (D-WA, right), the Congressman is urging his
colleagues to support the legislation he crafted to save the Internet
radio industry by sending a letter to Members of Congress every
day until October 21.
Inslee, along withReps. George
Nethercutt (R-WA) and Rick Boucher
(D-VA), in July introduced the Internet
Radio Fairness Act (IRFA, see RAIN coverage here).
The legislation would provide various measures of relief for smaller
webcasters who fear their operations will be forced to
shut down when the Librarian of Congress determined royalties for
the music they play are due.
According to the release, the bill is now cosponsored by
23 other members of Congress. However, at least one webcaster who
has been involved in meetings with Representatives says that figure
is dated -- and the bill now has 50
signatures!
The IFRA, if passed, would exempt "small
business" webcasters (those that gross under $6
million per year) from the
Librarian's determination of sound recording royalties of $0.0007
($0.0002 for noncommercial webcasters not part of the Corporation
for Public Broadcasting) per "performance" plus 8.8% for
ephemeral fees, with a $500 minimum. (This would not absolve webcasters
of royalties -- the royalties due for the period covered by the
Librarian's decision would be determined by the next
copyright arbitration.)
The measure would also change the standard
arbitrators try to meet in determining a royalty to recommend to
the Librarian.
Instead of a "willing buyer/willing
seller" standard used by the Copyright Arbitration
Royalty Panel, the bill calls for the use of the "traditional" standard
enacted by the 1976 Copyright Act.
Further, the ephemeral charge would be eliminated,
small businesses would not be required to pay to participate in
future CARPs, and future CARPs would need to comply with the Regulatory
Flexibility Act requiring the consideration of a new royalty rate's
impact on small business.
Librarian of Congress Dr. James Billington is pictured at
right.
The text of the letter, signed by Inslee, Nethercutt, and
Boucher, is below. You can read a copy of the "background and
legislation summary document" here
(Microsoft Word format).
SAVE INTERNET RADIO
Cosponsor the Internet Radio Fairness Act
Dear Colleague:
Today, millions of consumers and thousands of artists are enjoying
the benefits of Internet radio, and several thousand webcasters
are offering listeners diverse musical genres and an extraordinary
range of artists that do not get radio airplay. Unfortunately,
however, new royalty rates set to go into effect October 21st
are threatening the future of this industry.
In the middle and late 1990's, Congress passed legislation intended
to promote both the growth of Internet radio and the welfare
of music creators. Yet problems developed around the new royalty
that Congress required Internet radio to pay recording companies
and artists (a royalty that traditional terrestrial radio stations
do NOT have to pay). The new royalty fees are so high that they
will put hundreds of small businesses and noncommercial webcasters
out of business, and force terrestrial radio stations that "simulcast"
to shut down their Internet streams thereby eliminating royalties
that would otherwise flow to artists and copyright holders.
Please see the attached background and legislation summary
document.
In order to avoid a train-wreck in the Internet radio industry,
we have introduced the Internet Radio Fairness Act (H.R. 5285).
This bill will help avoid decimation of the Internet radio companies,
while ensuring a fair royalty return for artists and labels.
If you would like to cosponsor this legislation, please contact
Brian Bonlender (Inslee 5-6311), Rob Neal (Nethercutt 5-2006),
or Johanna Mikes (Boucher 5-3861).
Sincerely,
JAY INSLEE (D-WA)
GEORGE NETHERCUTT (R-WA)
RICK BOUCHER (D-WA)
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
BY PAUL MALONEY The Clear Channel broadcast group is using the Internet to
distribute audio content for today's September 11 commemorative
programming to their over 1200 stations. A company called Andromeda
is providing the technology.
On a page called "Tributes and Triumph: America's Day
of Remembrance" (here),
Clear Channel has
posted well over a
hundred MP3 audio files of actualities, news bites, and statements
and speeches from those involved in the events and reactions to
the terrorist attacks on our country one year ago. The files can
be "streamed" for auditioning purposes, and then downloaded
by
the radio stations for on-air use.
Clear Channel produced a special two-minute audio montage
honoring heroes and victim's of last September 11 to air today.
A recorded message from President Bush followed the airing of the
montage on Clear Channel stations, and the company made both recordings
available to the radio industry and public.
Andromeda provides a cross-platform tool to serve audio files
(as well as other types) for corporate, public, and private use.
You can see the features of their services here.
This is Part 2 of 5 in a series... BY
JOEL WILLER
for Radio And Internet Newsletter
The Recording Industry Association of America's SoundExchange
has continually attempted to use the "little guy" image of recording
artists as a human front for
the multinational corporations represented by the RIAA membership.
RIAA's fill-in-the-blank spokesperson of the day will inevitably
weave into any sound bite reference to artists' deferred royalty
compensation.
In the case of college radio, RIAA wonks have even argued
that excruciatingly detailed recordkeeping is mandatory to ensure
obscure artists are fairly compensated for airplay in eclectic formats.
Just how much money for artists
are we really talking about? In the first part of this series (here)
I accepted the general notion that many high school, college, and
university radio
stations will pay the minimum
annual performance royalty fee for their Internet retransmissions.
Using that assumption as a basis, let's look at some real numbers.
As with the earlier installment of this series, I'll use actual
figures from the University of Louisiana at Monroe's noncommercial
radio station KXUL to make
my point.
In contrast with many college radio stations, KXUL makes
comparatively extensive use of computerized tools in its programming.
This clarification is offered to head off any false conclusion that
information available to KXUL is easily obtainable by the majority
of college radio stations. Before generalizing this analysis to
other college radio stations, I must also point out that music rotation
on KXUL probably includes a list of songs much smaller than is typical
of many college radio stations. As a result, the figures below will
likely overstate the amounts
of individual artist compensation across the universe of college
radio stations.
"Would you like to supersize
that?" An advantage provided by KXUL's resources is that the station
can readily determine the frequency with which a particular song
has been played on air. A review of historical airplay for one week
reveals that the average title is performed by KXUL 1.17 times each
day. Of course, some songs are played more often than others, and
many songs will be played for only a portion of each year, but this
number represents a fair estimation of the high side of "average"
on KXUL.
Comparing this number to the total number of daily performances,
using the Librarian of Congress' estimation method, shows that the
"average" song represents 0.406% of KXUL's airplay.
Assume for a moment that a benevolent SoundExchange
does not withhold administrative costs from the $500 minimum annual
royalty fee collected from KXUL. In such case, $2.03 of the total
royalty would be generated annually by the "average" KXUL song.
Of that amount, $1.02 (50%) would be distributed to the recording
label, 91¢ (45%) to the featured
artist, and 10¢ (5%) collectively
to the non-featured musicians on the recording. In actuality, these
figures would each be reduced by the amount of SoundExchange's administrative
costs.
The annual royalty KXUL will pay a featured artist for the
station's "average" recording could be used to supersize
a fast food meal. What happens when KXUL's fees are combined with
all other college stations?
(CONTINUED BELOW)
(FROM
ABOVE) It is difficult to accurately estimate the total number of
college webcasters nationwide. In initial comments filed in the Copyright Office's recordkeeping proceeding, the Intercollegiate
Broadcasting System stated
that 243 of the organization's 773 member stations report webcasting.
IBS estimates two hundred more have been deterred from webcasting
by fear of copyright consequences. Using these figures as a basis,
I'll generously estimate a total of 500 college webcasters.
Multiplying KXUL's royalty figures by the estimated universe
of college webcasters results in a nationwide annual total of just
$456.75 for the featured artist
for the "average" recording receiving college radio airplay. The same
calculation predicts $50.75 collectively
for the non-featured musicians on the "average" recording.
However, these estimates must be adjusted downward to reflect
1) college radio playlists are generally more diverse
than is characterized by KXUL, 2) stations paying the minimum annual
fee rather than the actual royalty liability inflate
the total, 3) actual royalties distributed will be reduced by SoundExchange
administrative costs, and 4)
those recordings that, unlike the "average," receive only a few spins
on a station or stations.
It can't be about the money Use of KXUL's actual performance royalty liability, rather
than the minimum annual fee, would drastically reduce these estimates.
Applying the same modeling as above to KXUL's actual 2001 annual streaming
traffic, generalized to all college radio stations, would net an annual
national total of just $96.63 for the featured artist on the "average"
recording. Non-featured musicians on the same recording would collectively
receive just $10.74.
We can therefore conclude that a featured artist on a recording
receiving substantial nationwide airplay by college webcasters
will annually receive less than a buck,
perhaps much less, per station from the new royalties. Peripheral
featured artists' royalties will amount to just pennies per station.
If artists knew the realistic royalty amounts represented by
college radio retransmissions via the Internet, rather than the RIAA
hype, which do you imagine they would chose: 1) to forego negligible
royalty payments to ensure college webcasters can survive, or 2) lose
the promotional benefit from airplay on an estimated 500 college Web
stations nationwide?
Given the trifling level of royalty compensation from college
webcasters flowing to the labels for each recording, can the generation
of new revenue be the true motivation
driving the RIAA?
Joel Willer is an Assistant Professor of Mass Communications at
the University of Louisiana at Monroe and general manager of the school's
radio station KXUL. There will be three more installments to this
series. Read Part 1 here...
... Here is a growing list of webcasters
who, because they don't feel they can manage webcasting royalties
in a viable business, have decided that it's in their best interests
to silence their streams. (We thank them for their hard work
and dedication to their audiences and the industry, and wish
them luck in their future endeavors...)
Have
we missed others? Use the feedback form above or e-mail
us here.
Other public
stations now off line
This is from the SOS:
Save Our Streams website, which focuses the struggle
against thewebcasting royalty rates as they pertain to independent
educational and noncommercial stations.