The cover story of the May 1999 edition of Success
magazine featuring streaming aggregator Broadcast.com founders Mark
Cuban and Todd Wagner
reads particularly interestingly here in mid-2002,
offering insight into the aggressive and competitive nature of Cuban.
It was of course this nature that would lead him to plan a business
strategy by which (among other things), to quote the article, "build
barriers to shut out potential rivals."
Since that article was published, Cuban sold his company
to Yahoo!, whose subsequent
royalty deal with the recording industry was used as the basis for
the Librarian of Congress's determination of a statutory rate for
the rest of the webcasting industry.
After the Librarian agreed that arbitrators' use of the
deal as a benchmark for a statutory rate was not arbitrary, Cuban
revealed in an e-mail RAIN that the deal was specifically
crafted by Yahoo! to shut out
small webcasters and decrease competition.
Specifically, he wanted a "per stream" (as opposed to
a "percentage of revenue" rate), since smaller webcasters
would most likely not be able to afford to compete in that structure.
The thinking was that smaller webcasters, who would be unable to
afford to webcast on their own under such terms (because of the
fixed rates), would be compelled to use the services of well-funded
aggregators like the Yahoo! Broadcast service. See our full coverage
of this story here.
It is now -- against this royalty determination -- that the
industry of small webcasters is now fighting for their very existence.
Below are excerpts from the original Success piece:
"One of the hottest companies in cyberspace occupies
a converted warehouse in Deep Ellum, an old, honky-tonk neighborhood
nestled near the glass towers of Dallas's central business district.
The warehouse roof bristles with satellite dishes that pull in TV
and radio broadcasts from all over the country and, increasingly,
the world. Downstairs, in a large room full of rack-mounted computer
equipment, technicians transfer the sound and images to a Web site
called www.broadcast.com...
"At the heart of this enterprise are Mark Cuban and
Todd Wagner, the visionary odd couple who run Broadcast.com Inc.
Together, these men have built the Internet's leading broadcast
company. Their initial public offering (IPO) was one of the most
successful win Wall Street history. Broadcast.com stock rose by
249 percent on its first day of trading, July 17, 1998. Cuban, Wagner,
and the other original investors became instant paper millionaires;
the company raised more than $40 million in operating capital.
(CONTINUED BELOW)
(FROM ABOVE)
"Guessing that Internet broadcasting might have commercial
potential, they assembled what would become Broadcast.com in Cuban's
spare bedroom, for less than $5000. Cuban put up $2,995 for a Packard
Bell 486 PC, about $1,000 for network equipment, and $60 per month
for an ISDN line...
"As e-mail flooded in from office workers in Dallas
and homesick Dallas natives everywhere, Cuban and Wagner realized
they might actually have a viable business on their hands. They
launched a company called AudioNet and started pitching Internet
distribution to radio stations and sports teams all over the country.
The business model: Content providers interested in expanding their
listenership over the Web would pay AudioNet to Webcast their programs.
'We licensed a lot of content for multiple years because nobody
else cared about it,' Wagner says. 'I mean, we were creating something
that didn't even exist. Internet broadcast rights -- what were those?'...
"I think we have the chance to change the way the world
communicates and just make an obscene amount of money along
the way." -- Mark Cuban
"Having created a viable revenue model, Cuban and
Wagner needed a way to keep competitors out of their territory.
So, they began putting together a sizable inventory of Internet
programming that Web users would be able to find only at their site.
The more content they controlled, the more difficult it would be
for potential rivals to enter the market...
"This is the Internet, mind you, so Broadcast.com has
yet to make a dime in profits. Although revenue has grown dramatically
in the past three years, operating and marketing costs have grown
even faster. The company lost $14.9 million last year on revenue
of $22. 4 million. And the company's stock prospectus contains this
chilling little disclaimer: 'The Company expects to continue to
incur significant losses on a quarterly and annual basis for the
foreseeable future.'
"Sitting in his modest cubicle on the main warehouse
floor at Broadcast.com, Cuban waves a dismissive paw when I bring
this up. "That's just lawyer stuff...I think we have a chance
to change the way the world communicates and just make an obscene
amount of money along the way.'
(CONTINUED BELOW)
Thanks
to all the fine companies
who agreed to be part of our recent "RAINVendor Guide (Ver. 2.0)" issue. You
can see the entire Guide here.
To be part of RAIN's Vendor Guide, please call
312-527-3879. (The "Full service provider"
and "Internet radio devices" categories will
be featured next time).
E-mail
marketing
Dat-e-Base
(Presslaff Interactive Revenue) Experienced, hands-on marketing expertise and easy
to use product combine to help you build relationships
and revenue with your e-mail marketing efforts. D-e-B
is recognized for its sophistication; PIR for its impeccable
customer service. Cash/Barter. E-mail ruth@presslaff.com
for more information.
E-Mail
Director Ease of use, immediate access to listener data
and messaging tools make EMD Radios #1 Choice. Rich
media authoring is radically simplified. NTR powerhouse
for stations of any size. Barter service.
FMW
eListenerSuite eListenerSuite gives
you the tactical advantage you need to ensure you've effectively
reinforced your brand and the perception of extensive
time spent listening.
RadioWebStuff Successful one-to-one interaction
is not based on technology; it is based on providing outstanding
content and value to listeners and clients. Our extensive
background in radio programming, marketing, sales and
promotion can help build the permission/trust paradigm,
reinforce your brand and generate revenue.
(FROM
ABOVE)
"In
the looking-glass world of the Internet, where the most successful
companies lose more money than their rivals do, all the emphasis
is on building a sufficiently high profile that you become one of
the coveted "portals," the sites that most people go to
automatically whenever they want a given service...
"As Cuban and Wagner never tire of saying, their business
strategy is really quite simple: provide compelling content, build
barriers to shut out potential rivals,
differentiate yourself from the competition. And do it all very,
very quickly, because this is the Internet, the world's newest and
potentially richest media market, and there are plenty of wealthy
competitors drooling over your visibility and market share...
"'We always try to accelerate so there's no room for
someone to pass us,' Cuban concludes. "To get to the front
of the parade, you jump in front.'"
This column appeared in the May 1999 issue of Success magazine.
This feedback is in response
to our piece on AFTRA rates for political ads (yesterday in RAINhere)...
"Without
FIRST having negotiated the Internet talent rights..."
This is NOT the regular AFTRA rate. AFTRA applies the 300%
surcharge only when a broadcast commercial is also scheduled
for Internet airplay, without FIRST having negotiated the Internet
talent rights. Paragraph 10 of the 2000 agreement very succinctly
makes the distinction.
The contract very clearly provides for negotiation of a session
fee for an Internet designated commercial. Most of our commercials
are run prior to having obtained Internet rights in advance, often
by repurposing or re-tracking a radio spot, thus avoiding the 300%
penalty.
This issue is extremely important to clarify for webcast sales
forces as well as ad agency talent clearance staffs, which might otherwise
interpret a surcharge for Internet usage to be onerous and therefore
not recommend the use of streaming audio advertising. You would be
doing a great service to those of us in the industry selling ads to
generate income to meet their RIAA payments and make streaming a profitable
enterprise, to clarify this point prominently and swiftly.
Bob Nagengast, VP National
Sales
Hiwire
Ed. replies: Mr. Nagengast is correct in that when
the article was published, it did not include an explanation
of advertisers' right to negotiate around the 300% clause with
AFTRA. (Mr. Nagengast's original e-mail included the text of
Paragraph 10 of the 2000 agreement.)
By qualifying the 300% rate as applying for "originally
made for broadcast radio," "broadcast spots that end
up in an Internet stream," and "broadcast commercials...(that)
wound up in Internet streams;" it was our intention to
characterize them as work originally intended only for broadcast
play, and which would be streamed without prior AFTRA consent.
We hope Mr. Nagengast's contribution dispels any confusion.
-- PM
... Here is a growing list of webcasters
who, because they don't feel they can manage webcasting royalties
in a viable business, have decided that it's in their best interests
to silence their streams. (We thank them for their hard work
and dedication to their audiences and the industry, and wish
them luck in their future endeavors...)
Have
we missed others? Use the feedback form above or e-mail
us here.
Public stations
now off line
This is from the SOS:
Save Our Streams website, which focuses the struggle
against thewebcasting royalty rates as they pertain to independent
educational and noncommercial stations.