From the New York Times: "The reorganization of AOL
Time Warner last week has been recounted as a story of Time
Warner, the king of traditional media, reclaiming its rightful throne
from the upstart digital pretender, America Online.
"But as old-line media celebrates its return to power
and to vogue, some analysts and executives caution that the Internet's
capacity to change the rules should not be discounted too quickly.
Investors may have repudiated the Internet, they say, but consumers
have not.
"'The Internet may not be doing so great on Wall Street,
but it's doing great on Main Street,' said Marshall Cohen, senior
vice president for research at America Online. 'As far as the people
who are online, they're using it more and valuing it more.'
"For consumers, that may be a good thing. But for media
companies looking to the Internet for profits, it remains a frustrating
reality. The 'digital revolution' that many traditional media executives
were convinced would topple them or make them rich has not materialized.
"In part, that is because the Internet has turned out
to be more of a souped-up telephone
than a delivery vehicle for media and entertainment. E-mail messaging
is by far the medium's most popular feature.
"But with 61 percent of American adults using the Internet,
up from 46 percent two years ago, analysts and media executives
say the medium is
beginning to change consumer expectations
of what mainstream culture should offer. Consumers who were once
content to sit back and absorb what was beamed at them are demanding
more control over how and when they consume movies, television,
newspapers and music...
"But perhaps the most far-reaching impact lies in the
rhythms and habits formed by daily use of the Web's interactive
features...
"'The move from passive to a more active paradigm in
consumer behavior is where the new media has had the greatest impact,'
said Henry Jenkins, director of comparative media studies at the
Massachusetts Institute of Technology."
Read this entireNew York Times article online here.
Thanks
to all the fine companies
who agreed to be part of our recent "RAINVendor Guide (Ver. 2.0)" issue. You
can see the entire Guide here.
To be part of RAIN's Vendor Guide, please call
312-527-3879. (Tomorrow's category: Audio processing)
Today's
featured category: Ad insertion
Hiwire
Hiwire is the foremost developer of advertising solutions
for terrestrial and Internet-only radio stations. Through
its proprietary audio ad insertion network, Hiwire offers
advertisers and broadcasters an online strategy that reaches
consumers and generates revenue.
iM
Networks IM Networks' IM IT Targeted
Ad Insertion Solution enables advertisers to reach Internet
radio listeners beyond the PC. IM IT also enables Internet
radio content providers to earn revenue from each new
additional listener. Contact advertising@imnetworks.com
Lightningcast Lightningcast provides industry-leading
targeted streaming ad insertion technology. Lightningcast's
sales rep arm uses our largest affiliate network to enhance
affiliate revenue. Lightningcast supports Microsoft, Real,
Live, On-Demand, Audio and Video, Netscape and Windows,
download-free. Contact scott@lightningcast.com.
RCS
SplitStream Even targeted ad insertion can sound just
like terrestrial radio with smooth segues, no
delays, no clipping, and no buffering. RCS
SplitStream is available with both RCS Internet products
iSelector and RadioShow.
SoniXtream
(Broadcast Electronics, Inc.) Enter the world of Internet
rich media broadcasting quickly and easily with SoniXtream's
suite of enabling tools. Our web browser-based program
management tools and robust delivery infrastructure allow
you to harness the power of audio to offer an enhanced
experience for your customers.
Spotfarm Spotfarm's hosted ad insertion
services offer an easy to implement turnkey solution for
broadcasters who intend to generate revenue through advertising.
By partnering with Spotfarm, Internet radio stations do
not have to concern themselves with selling, tracking,
and billing and can focus solely on quality content programming.
From John Naughton in Britain's The Guardian Unlimited Observer:
"The irrational exuberance triggered by the stock
market's discovery of the Internet provided an excellent illustration
of this column's First Law of Technology -- namely that we always
overestimate the short-term
impact of new technologies while under-estimating their long-term
impacts.
"In the long run, the Internet will probably have as
transforming an effect on our society as the automobile or even
print, so it's understandable that investors wanted to get in on
the ground floor. But they got the timescales wrong...
"Ever since the Nasdaq crash people have been asking
plaintively 'How is it possible to make
money from the Internet?'.
"It's the wrong question, because it's based on a fundamental
misconception. Companies think the Internet is a new way of doing
business -- like mail order on steroids. In fact the
Net is much more like electricity.
Nobody except power utilities makes money from electricity, but
all businesses make money by using it...
"The first step on the road to business success on the
Net, therefore, is to drop the wishful thinking about what industries
would like it to be and come to terms with what
it is -- an astonishing system that enables people to
communicate on an unparalleled scale and with unprecedented intensity...
"The Internet is remarkable because it's the first communications
system since print that is uncontrolled and indifferent about the
uses to which it is put. All it does is deliver packets of data
from one point to another. It doesn't care what's in the packets.
That's why it generated such an explosion
of
creativity -- if you were smart enough to think of something ingenious
to do with data packets (radio, file-sharing, telephony, gaming),
then the net would let you do it.
"But this permissive openness is anathema to governments
and the entertainment
industries, both of whom are conspiring
to destroy the Net by making it closed and controlled.
There won't be another tech boom if they are allowed to succeed."
Read Naughton's entire column in The Observer online
here.
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
From the press release: "Blue
Falcon Networks announced an $8.5 million third round of
financing led by Sprout
Group, bringing the total capital raised by the company
to $20 million.
"Based in Los Angeles, Blue Falcon develops content
delivery solutions that combine highly efficient distributed file
transport with sophisticated centralized control and management.
"Existing investors Draper Fisher Jurvetson, Zone Ventures,
and Wasatch Ventures participated in the financing with Sprout Group,
the proceeds of which will be used for product development and operations.
Josh Goldman, Entrepreneur
in Residence at the Sprout Group, will join Blue Falcon as CEO...Jay
Haynes, the company's former CEO will assume the position
of President and Chief Operating Officer."
This feedback is in response to RAIN coverage of wireless
"mesh networks" (here)...
"Bottom
line: there's no affordable way..."
Don't get your hopes up about mesh networks. Mesh networks
using mobile devices in repeater mode aren't going to work. Of
course, the theory is that there'll be lots of repeaters with lots
of paths to the cloud, so not everyone gets his or her battery sucked
totally dry. Maybe.
Maybe there's a play as a wireless backhaul strategy in fixed
wireless nets, but right now the market is committed to WCDMA as "the
mobile air interface," not 802.11. Will 802.11 ultimately prevail?
Sure, after someone puts an 802.11 node on every power pole in the
U.S. (with backhaul probably provided gratis from the cable TV wire/fiber
that's also on the power pole).
Bottom line: there's no affordable way to wirelessly stream
continuous user selectable audio (or video) to mobile users for 10
years at least.
Regards, William Lovin
In response to a RAIN Reader Feedback piece (third item)
here...
"Get
music to the public..."
I agree with Phillip Sandifer, who commented that this is a
time for webcasters to make great strides in the industry. We (webcasters
and artists) have the technology to produce high quality recordings,
and artists
(who are generally ignored or screwed over by the industry) are abundant.
Webcasters can give artists exposure and the opportunity to
sell CDs through the websites. This may not produce millions of dollars,
but it would be more than most independent artists are making now.
I am creating a database that will act as a clearinghouse between
artists and webcasters. It is a way for webcasters to find artists,
and artists to find webcasters. It is called RIAAFU
located at www.geocities.com/RIAAFU
(soon to be RIAAFU.com).
This is not a commercial site and I will not send useless e-mail
to those who register. We just need a way to find each other so music
can be heard without RIAA getting their hands in the cookie jar.
The goal is simple, to get music to the public.
Fawn McDonald
"We
have lost a pillar of Boston's musical community..."
An open letter to the powers that be...
I miss RadioBoston. A lot. My workday is quieter, less engaging,
as one minute tumbles into the next with nary a difference.
This has less to do with my chosen occupation and whether or not it
instills me with passion than it does with the current lack of RadioBoston
by my side and the lassitude that ensues. But then again, you probably
do not care how fulfilling my workday is.
The buzz around the Boston Music scene is quieter. Its cynosure
has taken leave of us. The voices of its proponents, with their ubiquitous
CD players and microphones, are now silent...
There is no venue, radio or television station, or Internet
site that showcases local music to the extent that RadioBoston did.
There are innumerous artists I never would have discovered if it wasn't
for RB. There are many shows I never would have attended if it wasn't
for RB. And there are multiple albums I never would have found and
purchased if it wasn't for RB. And now there are so many songs that
are stuck in my noggin that I will not hear because RadioBoston is
silent.
At the risk of sounding importunate, I must vociferously express
that I want my RadioBoston back. It was mine, as it was all the listeners'.
We heard the music we wanted to hear, and the EJ's played newly uncovered
music they wanted us to hear, and, most of the time, we loved it.
We have lost a pillar of Boston's musical community, and the loss
is just as great for the artists of this city as it is for listeners
worldwide. Whether intentional or not, in today's isolated world,
RB brought everyone just a little bit closer...
At the close of this rambling and garrulous letter, let me
also express my willingness to volunteer my own efforts to bring RadioBoston
back to the airwaves, whatever little that may help.
In all sincerity, Ms. Christine M. Shepherd
Photographer/Unix Systems Engineer
Medford, Massachusetts
... Here is a growing list of webcasters
who, because they don't feel they can manage webcasting royalties
in a viable business, have decided that it's in their best interests
to silence their streams. (We thank them for their hard work
and dedication to their audiences and the industry, and wish
them luck in their future endeavors...)
Have
we missed others? Use the feedback form above or e-mail
us here.
Public stations
now off line
This is from the SOS:
Save Our Streams website, which focuses the struggle
against thewebcasting royalty rates as they pertain to independent
educational and noncommercial stations.