Link to Vendor Guide 2003
 
 
  Daily news and commentary on the key issues involving radio and the Internet Link to previous issue Link to next issue   
     


Contact RAIN
Feedback form

Ratecard

"The Future of
   Radio" series
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5

































































































































Past issues
Guest essays
Metrics analysis

Copyright Law
DMCA

Click here to make RAIN your default homepage!




Arbitron's Measurecast
Ratings:
Weekly:
Week of June 23
Week of June 16
Week of June 9
Week of June 2

Monthly:
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003


We'll send you a brief daily summary of each day's stories with a clickable link to the RAIN home page.

 

 



BY KURT HANSON
In the entire history of media buying,
no advertiser has ever purchased an ad schedule on every magazine in America. No advertiser has ever purchased a spot schedule on every radio station in America or every TV program in America.

Keep that idea in the back of your mind for a moment.

Meanwhile, note that the nascent medium of Internet radio has grown in audience size to be the equivalent (during the hours of Mon-Fri 9AM-5PM) of the 15th largest radio market in the U.S., with an AQH audience size of over 500,000 listeners and a cume of millions. (See Wednesday's RAIN here for details.)

And these are very desirable consumers: Employed, upscale, and attentive, with a tendency to be early-adopters!

Furthermore, delivering a radio spot schedule to them via Internet radio should, for several reasons, be at least as effective as — and probably more effective than — the same schedule delivered via terrestrial radio. (See Monday's and Thursday's RAIN issues here and here for some of those reasons.)

But national and network advertisers have not yet taken advantage of the opportunities in this space.
(See Tuesday's RAIN here for some speculation on reasons why.)

High-concept, attention-getting idea
So, as a means of grabbing their attention and getting some action going, yesterday in RAIN (here) I suggested that what we need is a sexy, "high concept" idea

Here's what I proposed:

Let's put together a national road show, visiting top national and network radio advertisers and agencies, pitching them on the concept of one advertiser buying THE ENTIRE MEDIUM of Internet radio!

Specifically, let's offer one major national advertiser the opportunity to buy a radio spot schedule that would run every two hours for eight weeks on virtually every Internet radio station and channel in North America!

Hopefully this would be one of the most powerful, dramatic, and effective media buys in the history of media buying.

If we're successful, this would hopefully, be front-page news in Ad Age and Mediaweek and the "Business Day" section of the New York Times and elsewhere. As a result, the savvy advertiser (Office Depot? Heineken? BMW? Dell?) who makes this buy will get valuable media exposure far above-and-beyond the radio buy itself!

Response has been very positive
RAIN readers' response to this idea has been almost universally positive.

In fact, I've already got tentative commitments to participate from five of the largest Internet-only webcasters plus three of the largest terrestrial radio broadcasters who stream simulcasts of their broadcast stations on the web.

A "midsize" webcaster, Vytas Safroncikas, of BornAgainRadio.com, made a very good point (in his third and fourth sentences) when he wrote, "Awesome idea, Kurt! It's loaded with 'sizzle.' [But] I'd suggest we target advertisers with some care. Our choice can help create a general perception that (1) we have a broad, desirable, mainstream audience with varying tastes or (2) that we cater to the 'fringe.'"

And Susquehanna Radio's Dan Halyburton told me his group of stations is "in," but warned me that we'd better carefully think through all of the logistical issues. Also a good point.

Proposed game plan
I'm still absorbing advice
as it comes in from various parties, but here's my first draft of a proposed game plan. I'd welcome your input on it:

  • RAIN will set up a website next week to be a central location from which we can coordinate the logistics of the project.

  • On that website, you'll be able to find and print a document in which you commit to running the schedule. You'll also be able to describe the type of inventory you can offer. (For example: Can you run in-stream ads — or can you only run "gateway" ads? Can you display a 468x60 banner ad while the spots run? (If not, can you give the advertiser some exposure on your home page?))

  • We'll immediately start putting together the "pitch," using some elements from this week's series of articles and some elements from our "The Future of Radio" series (here).

  • We'll also start putting together a team of people (example pictured) who can articulately tell this story once we start our road show. For each meeting, I envision putting together a group that might include one large webcaster, one small webcaster, one broadcaster, and a representative of one or two support firms (e.g., Arbitron and/or a national rep firm).

  • As noted above, we need to give serious thought to developing a list of target advertisers. Should we concentrate on advertisers who are major national and network radio buyers already, or should we try to bring someone new into the medium? How upscale should we go in terms of our targets? (GM? BMW? Rolls-Royce?) How helpful will it be if the advertiser really cares about getting consumers to its website (e.g., Dell)? (I imagine very much so.)

  • Regarding pricing: As I wrote yesterday, I believe our offer should, of course, be priced attractively, but I think we should start pitching it at the highish end of national spot pricing — e.g., at an $8 CPM — and learn what the market will bear.

  • Unless you object, I'd like to take out 20% of the gross revenues to cover sales and administrative costs, as I envision that this is going to be an expensive project and that Paul and I are essentially going to be devoting our entire summer and much of our fall to this effort. (Also, we would use a significant portion of that money to pay a bonus to the webcaster or account executive who gets the initial appointment for us that results in the final buy.)

  • As I mentioned yesterday, this needs to be run as simply as humanly possible for the advertiser: One contract, one invoice, one check.

  • Similarly, there should be one single, central source of affidavits that the ads ran as scheduled — i.e., webcasters submit affidavits to someone who reviews them and submits a single affidavit attesting to all of the other affidavits.

  • This initiative needs a catchy name: "BEM: Buy the Entire Medium"? Nope, not good enough. "MIRAC: Massive Internet Radio Ad Campaign"? Not even close. Here's an idea: I'll buy a free 10 Gb iPod (pictured) for the clever RAIN reader who comes up with the best name.

  • And finally, let me reiterate: If we succeed in doing this, we should try to seriously overdeliver on this campaign! This advertiser deserves to earn webcasters' undying loyalty — and let's start out by making this the best media buy this advertiser has ever bought.

Hopefully, it will be clear in a couple of days whether or not this project is a "go." Let me know what you think.

Please use the form immediately below to send me your feedback, or e-mail me at kurt@kurthanson.com. I look forward to hearing from you!

 


Have an opinion? Drop us a note! (Or, to use your own e-mail software, click here.)

  Your e-mail address:
  Your name (if not obvious from your e-mail address):
    Kurt and Paul, this is deep background -- don't quote me!

        Thanks!

 

Headline: Acacia seemingly aiming at small firms for "precedent fodder"
From Wired.com: "Executives at Acacia Media Technologies say they've got patents on streaming, downloading and just about every other form of delivering movies and sounds electronically.

"Now the firm is enforcing its legal claim -- by going after Internet porn pushers.

"Twenty-one blue content providers are actively grappling with Acacia in US District Court. Several firms have agreed to settle rather than risk a lengthy, possibly crippling legal battle... Generally, Acacia has been asking for 1 to 2 percent of a company's gross revenues in return for calling off the wing-tipped attack dogs.

"It's a fight with more than the fiscal health of a few smut sellers at stake. If Acacia can line up enough legal victories against the triple-X adversaries, patent experts say, the company may have legal grounds to go after the giants of digital content distribution, like Apple, Real and Microsoft -- and just about every other major media and communications player, too.

"'If you could establish good law against someone who can't spend a lot of money to crush you,' said Margaret Jane Radin, a professor at Stanford Law School, 'then in the next suit you could rely on that law, to some extent.'..

"'Our guys put together all the steps necessary for streaming and downloading,' said Ron Berman, an Acacia senior vice president. 'But that's not all,' he added. 'Cable companies, satellites companies -- we really cover all the forms of transmission. Not just the Internet, but Wi-Fi, microwave, cable and satellite, too. They basically all work the same way.'

"So pretty much every website streaming songs, every cable company selling movies-on-demand, and every porno firm digitally dispensing dirty video clips, Berman figures, now owes Acacia money."

This entire article appears today in Wired, online here.

...
...
RAIN readers may remember that Acacia is the company that entered a licensing deal with Radio Free Virgin, and attempted to establish a licensing arrangement with RadioIO.
...



Headline: Streaming Magazine takes time off to refocus industry coverage
BY PAUL MALONEY
Streaming Magazine, the Radio Ink print and online tech publication, has announced a summer hiatus to "retool and re-target" to cover a wider range of topics.

Publisher Eric Rhoads (pictured), in a statement on the news source's site, said, "There is more to streaming than simply moving packets of data from point A to point B. Today, it is about the merging of technology, content and business models into a new space designed to specifically communicate with consumers and clients."

Rhoads promises the magazine will better reflect the changes in the streaming industry with its return in the fall. More details are to follow, according to the statement, "within days."

With the changes, Streaming associate publisher Joel Unickow leaves, and executive editor Peggy Miles steps up to oversee the changes.
 
[an error occurred while processing this directive]

Reader Feedback
Here's feedback on Kurt's plan for selling on ad flight across the entire Internet radio medium, presented yesterday in RAIN (here)...

"'Early adopters' and 'trendsetters' that marketers covet..."


Kurt's ideas of offering a bulk purchase model and a road show are right on. Something needs to break this silly log jam; and this could be it.

I would strongly suggest that you include some major and large indie record labels in your meetings. With the increasing consolidation and homogenization of radio -- traditionally a record labels' # 1 promotional tool -- Internet (and perhaps satellite) broadcasting is providing important new avenues of exposure.

In music, the arts, technology and other categories, most Net radio listeners are the kind of affluent and experimental "early adopters" and "trendsetters" that marketers covet.

  Bruce Houghton, President
Skyline Music



"Sign me up!.."


Awesome idea, Kurt! It's loaded with "sizzle."

I'd suggest we target advertisers with some care. Our choice can help create a general perception that (1) we have a broad, desirable, mainstream audience with varying tastes or (2) that we cater to the "fringe." Sign me up!

  Vytas Safroncikas, President/GM BornAgainRadio.com



"Something good can come from this..."


Thanks for your fine work on Internet radio advertising. My three stations when they were up and running were averaging 5000 listening sessions a day, this equates to about 150,000 sessions a month.

My logs showed a early East Coast log-in starting at 8am Eastern time and running through a 5pm Pacific time day. The weekends were good also.

Keep up the good work. I've spent a lot of time with broadcast radio buying advertising in the Minneapolis/St. Paul market (#16). If we band together as Internet radio something good can come from this.

  DEEP BACKGROUND ONLY



"Every hour if necessary..."


Yes... I like the idea of advertising you have. I think it'll work... sexy enough for the advertisers and I want in. Please let me know how I can run those spots, every hour if necessary.

  Ed Glass
ElectricEyeRadio.com
 

We'll send you a brief daily summary of each day's stories with a clickable link to the RAIN home page.
 

Here's feedback on our series on Internet radio and ad sales, Monday through yesterday in RAIN (here, here, here, and here)...

"Sound like a sound investment?.."


While the Web as a whole has opened more doors to the masses (intellectually, informationally, commercially, etc.) in a few years than TV and radio have in their combined existences, when it comes to advertising, there appears to remain one very real barrier to doing so on Web radio: there is still a very tangible reticence on the part of many companies to invest time, man power and money into a medium that is, as of yet, still widely unregulated.

And as far as I've seen, in the case of Web radio stations, when regulations do come about (Congress, record labels, maybe the FCC at some near time), they usually screw the station, flushing any vested interests down the crapper. Sound like a sound investment to you?

  Just a thought,
Howie



"Radio is dead..."


You make a broad assumption about someone buying a new device (color screen) for radio's future. RADIO has no future! Streaming, broadcasting, it's all the same! It is STILL somebody telling you what to listen to. It still has delivery costs! Music lives on your hard drive, radio stations send "lists" (m3u's), not content, too expensive.

Music delivery is ancient, and cost prohibitive. Why would I buy a new receiver? To listen to more of Clear Channel's lousy, unimaginative programming? Let me see a picture of their old fat disc jockey, or logos on the screen from their sponsors! That'll change everything!

I repeat: Radio is dead, why bother?

  Bryan



"Necessary to educate..."


Most media buyers, as well as account executives don't understand or think of the Internet as an advertising vehicle. Therefore, it will be necessary to educate both.

  DEEP BACKGROUND ONLY
 
 
Upcoming conferences
July 17-20 Conclave Learning Conference 2003: Minneapolis
July 28-29 Jupiter Plug.In: New York
August 6-9 The R&R Triple-A Summit: Boulder
August 7-9 15th Annual Morning Show Boot Camp: Atlanta
October 1-3 The NAB Radio Show: Philadelphia
October 14-16 Streaming Media CA: Santa Clara
October 19-21 NAB European Radio Conference: London
October 22-25 CMJ Music Marathon: New York
November 6-9 Collegiate Broadcasters, Inc. Fall Convention: Dallas
November 8 Intercollegiate Broadcasting Fall Conference: Boston
March 10-12 Intercollegiate Broadcasting Annual Conference: New York
March 11, 2004 18th Annual Bayliss Radio Roast: New York

Search RAIN

(Hint: Use quotes)
Advanced Search

Click Here for AccuRadio



Software for RAIN's daily e-mail reminders provided by:


Publications
R&R
RBR
Radio Ink
All Access
Inside Radio
   

Internet Pubs.
Red Herring
Business 2.0
   
Other Publications
(was eRadio)
(Taz Media)
FMQB
   

 

 




 
 

TOP

Copyright 2003, RAIN Publications, Inc. All rights reserved.
All logos and trademarks are property of their respective owners.

Your RAIN staff
Kurt Hanson
Publisher
Paul Maloney
Editor
Ralph Sledge
"Site of the Day" Editor
David Don
Developer
Brad Knutson
Intern
Ben Huh
Project Manager