BY KURT HANSON
In the entire history of media buying, no advertiser has ever
purchased an ad schedule on everymagazine in America. No advertiser
has ever purchased
a spot schedule on every radio station
in America or every TV program
in America.
Keep that idea in the back of your mind for a moment.
Meanwhile, note that the nascent medium of Internet radio
has grown in audience size to be the equivalent (during the hours
of Mon-Fri 9AM-5PM) of the 15th largest
radio market in the U.S., with an AQH audience size of
over 500,000 listeners and a
cume of millions. (See Wednesday's
RAINhere
for details.)
And these are very desirable consumers: Employed, upscale,
and attentive, with a tendency to be early-adopters!
Furthermore, delivering a radio spot schedule to them via
Internet radio should, for several
reasons, be at least as effective as and probably more effective
than the same schedule delivered via terrestrial radio. (See
Monday's and Thursday's RAIN issues here
and here for
some of those reasons.)
But national and network advertisers have not yet taken advantage
of the opportunities in this space.
(See Tuesday's RAINhere
for some speculation on reasons why.)
High-concept, attention-getting
idea So, as a means of grabbing their attention and getting some
action going, yesterday in RAIN (here)
I suggested that what we need is a sexy,
"high concept" idea
Here's what I proposed:
Let's put together
a national road show, visiting top national and network radio
advertisers and agencies, pitching them on the concept of one
advertiser buying THE ENTIRE MEDIUM
of Internet radio!
Specifically, let's offer one major
national advertiser the opportunity to buy a radio spot
schedule that would run every two hours
for eight weeks on virtuallyevery
Internet radio station and channel in North America!
Hopefully this
would be one of the most powerful,
dramatic, and effective media buys in the history of media
buying.
If we're successful, this would hopefully, be front-page
newsin Ad Age and Mediaweek and the "Business Day"
section of the New York Times and elsewhere. As a result, the savvy
advertiser (Office Depot? Heineken? BMW? Dell?) who makes this buy
will get valuable media exposure far
above-and-beyond the radio buy itself!
Response has been very positive RAIN readers' response to this idea has been
almost universally positive.
In fact, I've already got tentative
commitments to participate from five of the largest Internet-only
webcasters plus three of the largest terrestrial
radio broadcasters who stream simulcasts of their broadcast stations
on the web.
A "midsize" webcaster, Vytas Safroncikas, of BornAgainRadio.com,
made a very good point (in his third and fourth sentences) when
he wrote, "Awesome idea, Kurt! It's loaded with 'sizzle.' [But]
I'd suggest we target advertisers with
some care. Our
choice can help create a general perception that (1) we have a broad,
desirable, mainstream audience with varying tastes or (2) that we
cater to the 'fringe.'"
And Susquehanna Radio's Dan Halyburton told me his group
of stations is "in," but warned me that we'd better carefully
think through all of the logistical
issues. Also a good point.
Proposed game plan
I'm still absorbing advice as it comes in from various parties,but here's my first draft of a proposed
game plan. I'd welcome your input on it:
RAIN will set up a website next week to be a central
location from which we can coordinate the logistics
of the project.
On that website, you'll be able to find and print a document
in which you commit to running the schedule. You'll also be able
to describe the type of inventory
you can offer. (For example: Can you run in-stream ads
or can you only run "gateway" ads? Can you display a
468x60 banner ad while the spots run? (If not, can you give the
advertiser some exposure on your home page?))
We'll immediately start putting together the "pitch,"
using some elements
from this week's series of articles and some elements from our
"The Future of Radio" series (here).
We'll also start putting together a team of people (example
pictured) who can articulately tell this story once we start our
road show. For each meeting,
I envision putting together a group that might include one large
webcaster, one small webcaster, one broadcaster, and a representative
of one or two support firms (e.g., Arbitron and/or a national
rep firm).
As noted above, we need to give serious thought to developing
a list of target advertisers.
Should we concentrate on advertisers who are major national and
network radio buyers already, or should we try to bring someone
new into the medium? How upscale should we go in terms of our
targets? (GM? BMW? Rolls-Royce?)
How helpful will it be if the advertiser really cares about getting
consumers to its website (e.g., Dell)? (I imagine very much so.)
Regarding pricing: As I wrote yesterday, I believe our
offer should, of course,be priced
attractively, but I think we should start pitching
it at the highish end of national spot pricing e.g., at
an $8 CPM and learn what the market will bear.
Unless you object, I'd like to take out 20% of the gross
revenues to cover sales and administrative
costs, as I envision that this is going to be an expensive
project and that Paul and I are essentially going to be devoting
our entire summer and much of our fall to this effort. (Also,
we would use a significant portion of that money to pay a bonus
to the webcaster or account executive who gets the initial
appointment for us that results in the final buy.)
As I mentioned yesterday, this needs to be run as simplyas
humanly possible for the advertiser: One contract, one invoice,
one check.
Similarly, there should be one single, central source
of affidavits that the ads
ran as scheduled i.e., webcasters submit affidavits to
someone who reviews them and submits a single affidavit attesting
to all of the other affidavits.
This initiative needs a catchy name: "BEM: Buy the
Entire Medium"? Nope, not good enough. "MIRAC: Massive
Internet Radio Ad Campaign"? Not even close. Here's an idea:
I'll buy a free 10 Gb iPod
(pictured) for the clever RAIN reader who comes up with
the best name.
And finally, let me reiterate: If we succeed in doing
this, we should try to seriously overdeliver
on this campaign! This advertiser deserves to earn webcasters'
undying loyalty and let's start out by making this the
best media buy this advertiser has ever bought.
Hopefully, it will be clear in a couple of days whether
or not this project is a "go." Let me know what you think.
Please use the form immediately below to send me your feedback,
or e-mail me at kurt@kurthanson.com.
I look forward to hearing from you!
From Wired.com: "Executives at Acacia
Media Technologies say they've got patents
on streaming, downloading and
just about every other form of delivering
movies and sounds electronically.
"Now the firm is enforcing its legal claim -- by going
after Internet porn pushers.
"Twenty-one blue content providers are actively grappling
with Acacia in US District Court. Several firms have agreed to settle
rather than risk a lengthy, possibly crippling legal battle... Generally,
Acacia has been asking for 1 to 2 percent
of a company's gross revenues in return for calling off
the wing-tipped attack dogs.
"It's a fight with more than the fiscal health of a
few smut sellers at stake. If Acacia can line up enough legal victories
against the triple-X adversaries,
patent experts say, the company may have legal
grounds to go after the giants of digital content distribution,
like Apple,
Real and
Microsoft
-- and just about every other major media and communications player,
too.
"'If you could establish good law against someone who can't
spend a lot of money to crush you,' said Margaret Jane Radin, a
professor at Stanford Law
School, 'then in the next suit you could rely on that law, to some
extent.'..
"'Our guys put together all the steps necessary for streaming
and downloading,' said Ron Berman, an Acacia senior vice
president. 'But that's not all,' he added. 'Cable companies, satellites
companies -- we really cover all the forms
of transmission. Not just the Internet, but Wi-Fi, microwave,
cable and satellite, too. They basically all work the same way.'
"So pretty much every websitestreaming
songs, every cable company selling movies-on-demand,
and
every porno firm digitally dispensing dirty video clips, Berman
figures, now owes Acacia money."
This entire article appears today in Wired, online here.
...
... RAIN readers may remember
that Acacia is the company that entered a licensing deal
with Radio
Free Virgin, and attempted to establish a licensing
arrangement with RadioIO.
...
BY PAUL MALONEY Streaming Magazine, the Radio Ink print and online
tech publication, has announced a summer hiatus to "retool and
re-target"
to cover a wider range of topics.
Publisher Eric Rhoads (pictured),
in a statement on the news source's site,
said, "There is more to streaming than simply moving packets
of data from point A to point B. Today, it is about the merging of
technology, content and business models into a new space designed
to specifically communicate with consumers and clients."
Rhoads promises the magazine will better reflect the changes
in the streaming industry with its return in the fall. More details
are to follow, according to the statement, "within days."
With the changes, Streaming associate publisher Joel
Unickow leaves, and executive editor Peggy
Miles steps up to oversee the changes.
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
Here's feedback on Kurt's
plan for selling on ad flight across the entire Internet radio medium,
presented yesterday in RAIN (here)...
"'Early
adopters' and 'trendsetters' that marketers covet..."
Kurt's ideas of offering a bulk purchase model and a road show
are right on. Something needs to break this silly
log jam; and this could be it.
I would strongly suggest that you include some major and large
indie record labels in your meetings. With the increasing consolidation
and homogenization of radio -- traditionally a record labels' # 1
promotional tool -- Internet (and perhaps satellite) broadcasting
is providing important new avenues of exposure.
In music, the arts, technology and other categories, most Net
radio listeners are the kind of affluent and experimental "early adopters"
and "trendsetters" that marketers covet.
Bruce Houghton, President
Skyline Music
"Sign
me up!.."
Awesome idea, Kurt! It's loaded with "sizzle."
I'd suggest we target advertisers with some care. Our choice
can help create a general perception
that (1) we have a broad, desirable, mainstream audience with varying
tastes or (2) that we cater to the "fringe." Sign me up!
Thanks for your fine work on Internet radio advertising. My
three stations when they were up and running were averaging 5000 listening
sessions a day, this equates to about 150,000 sessions a month.
My logs showed a early East Coast log-in starting at 8am Eastern
time and running through a 5pm Pacific time day. The weekends were
good also.
Keep up the good work. I've spent a lot of time with broadcast
radio buying advertising in the Minneapolis/St. Paul market (#16).
If we band together as Internet radio something good can come from
this.
DEEP BACKGROUND ONLY
"Every
hour if necessary..."
Yes...
I like the idea of advertising you have. I think it'll work...
sexy enough for the advertisers and I want in. Please let me know
how I can run those spots, every hour if necessary.
Ed Glass
ElectricEyeRadio.com
Here's feedback on our series on Internet radio and ad sales, Monday
through yesterday in RAIN (here,
here, here,
and here)...
"Sound
like a sound investment?.."
While the Web as a whole has opened more doors to the masses
(intellectually, informationally, commercially, etc.) in a few years
than TV and radio have in their combined existences, when it comes
to advertising, there appears to remain one very real barrier to doing
so on Web radio: there is still a very tangible reticence on the part
of many companies to invest time, man power and money into a medium
that is, as of yet, still widely unregulated.
And as far as I've seen, in the case of Web radio stations,
when regulations do come about (Congress, record labels, maybe the
FCC at some near time), they usually screw the station, flushing any
vested interests down the crapper. Sound like a sound investment to
you?
Just a thought, Howie
"Radio
is dead..."
You make a broad assumption about someone buying a new device
(color screen) for radio's future. RADIO
has no future! Streaming, broadcasting, it's all the same!
It is STILL somebody telling you what to listen to. It still has delivery
costs! Music lives on your hard drive, radio stations send "lists"
(m3u's), not content, too expensive.
Music delivery is ancient, and cost prohibitive. Why would
I buy a new receiver? To listen to more of Clear Channel's lousy,
unimaginative programming? Let me see a picture of their old fat disc
jockey, or logos on the screen from their sponsors! That'll change
everything!
I repeat: Radio is dead, why bother?
Bryan
"Necessary
to educate..."
Most media buyers, as well as account executives don't understand
or think of the Internet as an advertising vehicle. Therefore, it
will be necessary to educate both.