From the July 15th issue of Newsweek: "Jim
Atkinson is cannon fodder in
the digital-music wars. Five years ago he and his wife, Wanda,
began 3WK, a virtual radio
station that streams tunes of their beloved alt/indie rock to listeners
over the
Internet...
"[Internet radio is] a rich universe of more than 10,000
alternative Web stations, many of which cater to narrow if not bizarre
taste...
"Its the exact opposite
of broadcast radio, where the vast majority of stations are
owned by a few media giants, who restrict playlists to the lowest-common-denominator
ears.
"In the Webcast world...it’s possible for Jim and Wanda
Atkinson
to run one of the more popular sites — and one day, they hope, a
profitable ad-supported business...
"Possible, that is, until Oct. 20.
That’s the day the bill
comes due for a government-imposed performance fee brought about
by pressure from the recording industry...
"Kurt Hanson, publisher of Radio And Internet Newsletter,
has calculated that the Oct. 20 bill due for all Webcasters represents
several times the total revenue of the
entire industry. The folks at the Recording
Industry Association of America defend this on the ground
that without music, you have no Internet radio.
"This is like the government’s deciding to tax you three
times your gross income, because you really,
really benefited by living in the U.S.A. Meanwhile, for
broadcast radio there’s no performance fee at all...
"The apparent irony is that Webcasting seems like something
that the record labels would want to nurture,
not smother in the cradle. There’s
no Napster problem... Just like
real radio, it’s free exposure
for artists, especially ones that have difficulty getting air time
in the cookie-cutter world of FM radio.
"And Webcast listeners find it easy
to buy what they like: musical cuts are clearly identified,
and often there are direct links to allow an instant CD purchase.
(Atkinson claims that he’s generated more than $20,000
in CD sales.)..
"But SoundExchange’s Simson says that the labels don’t
view Webcasting as a promotional tool like broadcast radio... He
also worries that the narrow focus of Webcasts might poach sales:
if someone can stream an 'all Bruce all the time' Web radio station,
he says, their Springsteen craving might be forever satisfied. Seems
to me, though, that anyone who tunes in to that station would snatch
the Boss’s new CD the day it hit the stores.
"So why are the record labels taking such a hard line?
My guess is that it’s all about protecting their Internet-challenged
business model. Their profit comes from blockbuster
artists. If the industry moved to a more varied ecology,
independent labels and artists would thrive — to the detriment
of the labels, which would have trouble rustling up the rubes to
root for the next Britney.
"But...if enough...outraged listeners stream their objections
to legislators, maybe Internet radio can be saved. "
You'll want to read Levy's entire article in the July 15
print edition of Newsweek, or online here.
...
... This is one of the best articles
yet on the subject, summarizing the key issues much more
clearly than we've ever managed to do here at RAIN.
A quick note on Simson's arguments here: The more "irrational"
sounding one -- "there's no evidence that Internet radio
boosts record sales" -- was actually the conclusion reached
by the CARP panel. While it's so unintuitive as to be almost
ridiculous, the arbitrators said neither party had provided
solid evidence one way or another.
The second point, the hypothetical "all Bruce all
the time" station, is so misleading that I'd have to give
Simson the benefit of the doubt here, and guess that it wasn't
him but the author Levy who specifically came up with that example.
Here's why: Someone in Simson's position would know full
well that an "all Bruce" station wouldn't be eligible
for the compulsory license, as it would be in gross violation
of the "performance complement" element of the DMCA.
It's been my experience that the hypothetical Simson likes to
use is a "Chicago Blues" station. (Although it's incredibly
hard to imagine that the existence of a "Chicago Blues"
station would hurt sales
of blues albums!) -- PM ...
Thanks
to all the fine companies
(including those listed below) who agreed to be part
of our recent "RAINVendor Guide (Ver. 2.0)" issue. If
you didn't have a chance to spend time with it yet,
you can access the issue here.
The
U.S. Copyright Office has published in the Federal
Register their full final rule and order on webcasting
royalty rates. The document sheds quite a bit of light on
the reasoning used by the Register of Copyrights and the Librarian
of Congress in their decisions. Please see the document online
here,
and then look for analysis soon in RAIN. Thanks.
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
Here's more commentary on Hilary Rosen's speech from Plug.In (in
RAINhere)...
"There
must be an amendment to the DMCA..."
Quoting Hilary Rosen from the Plug.In conference: "This
is not a mom and pop issue, this is a business model issue."
Exactly correct. And the issue centers around the fact that
the recording industry refuses to adapt and/or enhance
THEIR business model for the Internet. The only change the RIAA
wants to make is to use their lobbying power in Washington to see
to it that they have complete control of an entire broadcast medium.
This is unacceptable.
With due respect to reps Inslee and Boucher, new legislation
that provides a "short term remedy" until the next CARP is convened
is not sufficient. This would only extend the uncertainty, and continue
to keep prospective advertisers and investors in our medium away.
There is tremendous interest from these entities, but thanks to
the hard lessons learned by so many in the "dot bomb" era, they
will not move until they can be reasonably sure that their investment
and advertising dollars are secure.
There must be an amendment to the DMCA, and it must happen
soon. Promotional value must be recognized and the performance royalty
fee must be completely eliminated. If it takes too long, and too
many webcasters have to shut down because of the uncertainty, the
RIAA will ultimately achieve their true goal of complete control.
Our representatives in Washington must not let this happen.
John Schneider
Radiopoly
"It
IS a Mom-and-Pop issue!.."
Ms. Rosen must be REALLY dense if she thinks that this
issue is a "business-model" issue!
Sorry, Ms. Rosen, but it IS
a Mom-and-Pop issue!!
You're trying to shut down small, independent webcasters
in order to force the same consolidation on the Internet Radio industry
that you've done to the terrestrial radio industry!
I, as an avid Internet Radio listener, DON'T like what you
want to see happen!
I have once again gone to the "Voice
Of Webcasters" site and sent a fax to my Senators & Congressman,
and I hope they don't listen to you or your corrupt, deep-pocketed
cohorts! I hope they listen to US, the citizens whom they happen
to work for, and SAVE INTERNET RADIO as it now is!!
I encourage EVERYONE reading this newsletter to go to the Voice
Of Webcasters website RIGHT NOW and send the fax to your Senators
and Congressman!
Let's show Ms. Rosen and her RIAA cohorts that we WON'T stand
for their monopolizing practices any longer!!
Dean Bodholdt
"We
decided to go with Live365..."
I noticed that when we shut down at the end of the day
on June 30 that I was posted under the "Silenced by royalties."
I greatly appreciate the recognition and having it posted there.
I just wanted to let you know that we decided to go with Live365
to continue streaming since they cover the royalty fees, and returned
to the air on July 9th.
Thanks for providing a great recourse for us with RAIN
and SaveInternetRadio.org! The information is vital and I am glad
that you have taken the time to provide it to us all.
Richard J. Cabral, Program
Director
Mix 967
Here is a growing list of webcasters
who, because they don't feel they can manage webcasting royalties
in a viable business, have decided that it's in their best interests
to silence their streams. (We thank them for their hard work
and dedication to their audiences and the industry, and wish
them luck in their future endeavors...)
Have
we missed others? Use the feedback form above or e-mail
us here.
Public stations
now off line
This is from the SOS:
Save Our Streams website, which focuses the struggle
against thewebcasting royalty rates as they pertain to independent
educational and noncommercial stations.
Zydeco to the Bone; Nuevo Wave-O; Jazzeteria; Altrok.com;
Celtic to the Bone; Extra Smooth Symphonie; Melancholia; Qawwali-On-Demand;
60s RnB to the Bone; Just Classic Rock; All Top40 Hits; Piecemeal;
Swing Central; Cafe Twilight; Jazz to the Bone; Drone Sickness;
Gospel to the Bone; Truly Cool, Cool Jazz; 400 Years of Hits
Jazz to the Bone; Hot Bubblegum 100; Dream Chamber; Modern A
Cappella; African to the Bone; Hillbilly Radio; Cajun N Country
to the Bone; X-tra Energy Dance; World Intensity; New Orleans
to the Bone; Modern Rock Hits; Rastaman's Reggae
MainLine Rock; Latin to the Bone; House Party; Love Field; Planet
Musiquarium; The Breakbeat Jungle; Succubus; Bollywood; Club
Reggae; Hyperspace; Murder, Betrayal and Redemption; Top RnB
Hits; ChitrapatSangeet; Resonant Radio; Sweet Revenge
Female Voices; Old Dawg Country; EnginesOfReagan; Lovecats;
Muddy Channel; Movie Music; Adventures In Radio; Truly Alternative;
Alt Songsters to the Bone; Spacerant; Trance-ilvania; Vox Radium;
50s RnB to the Bone; Box O Bone's; Digitalis; darcade; Not AA
Radio; Busted Heart Radio; Shuaku No Bi; Hillbilly Radio; Kickin'
Kountry; Cyberspace Sonata; Solvent Loud Radio