Link to AccuRadio.com
 
 
  Daily news and commentary on the key issues involving radio and the Internet Link to previous issuelink to next issue    
     

Contact RAIN
Feedback form
Ratecard

CRB coverage 2007:
CRB decision
SaveTheStreams
Legal options
Markey
Petitions
Copyright law
Canada?
Fred Wilhelms
[2] [3]
JPMorgan analyst
SaveNetRadio
Rehearing denied
SNR.org website
B'casters interests
Day of Silence?
What is "fair"?
House IREA
SX Point/Counter
July 15th D-Day
Hill walk recap
Senate IREA
Hanson/Simson
Offer to SCW
Berman/Coble
100th co-sponsor
File for stay
Noncomm offer
$1 bil admin cost


CRB coverage 2002:
CARP decision
Industry reacts
Industry stunned
Huge RIAA win
SJO editorial
Day of Silence?
Congress support
Day of Silence on!
Press coverage
Day of Silence
Librarian decision
Cuban speaks up
Labels: Die Now!
Forbes coverage
SWSA
SCW license


"The Future of
   Radio" series
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5

"Net radio frontier:
Ad sales" series
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5

UPDATED:
Internet radio
royalty basics


Copyright Law
DMCA
CRB 2007
 Webcast decision







Link to AndoMedia.com












































































Link to AndoMedia.com
























































We'll send you a brief daily summary of each day's stories with a clickable link to the RAIN home page.

 

 


"Katz Media Group, Inc. today announced that its Katz Radio Group acquired Net Radio Sales, Inc from Aritaur Communications Inc.

"The acquisition represents Katz Radio Group’s most significant investment in digital media and will offer advertisers expanded opportunities to reach their audience across multiple audio and web-based platforms. Net Radio Sales, to be renamed Katz Net Radio Sales, sells streaming audio as well as all forms of interactive advertising across its digital network of hundreds of Internet station affiliates and katz media groupprovides exact audience and impression measurement for every advertising campaign.

"The company represents a network of more than 1,000 Internet radio streams—both broadcast and Internet-only stations—reaching over 5 million listeners each month. Terms of the sale were not disclosed.

“The addition of Net Radio Sales offers us the opportunity to enter the exploding digital media world and is a natural extension of our business,” said Mark Gray, President of the Katz Radio Group...

"Katz Net Radio Sales will be led by Jennifer Lane (pictured right), the current president of Net Radio Sales. Ms. Lane, an early advocate for the online radio industry, started Net Radio Sales in 2003. Ms. Lane is widely considered one of the most prominent experts in Internet radio, dedicated to the use of precise data for audience and campaign measurement to benefit the industry and the advertiser.

"As part of this transaction, Katz entered an exclusive agreement to use the Internet radio audience measurement tools created by one of Aritaur’s partners, Ando Media."

...
x
It's been a discouraging past few months, to be sure. So to see movement like this in the industry is pretty invigorating.

Katz is one of radio sales' biggest firms, and the acquisition of Net Radio Sales is a credible vote of confidence in the importance and future of the Internet radio industry. And with any luck, this is just the beginning. -- PM
x
spacialaudio
RAIN is brought to you today by:
Link to AccuRadio.com

There's huge, and growing, demand among consumers for Internet radio (at least during the 9AM-5PM workday), as shown by the rapid growth of our AccuRadio project.

AccuRadio features a variety of popular music formats that you simply can't find on the broadcast dial: Swingin' Pop Standards, Brit Rock, Piano Jazz, Broadway and more at www.AccuRadio.com.


From the Chicago Tribune opinion section: "Every band dreams of the lucky night it'll be discovered by a music promoter or favorite record label. Overnight you've tangleweed on pandoragot a hot record, radio stations everywhere playing your songs and your band becomes a household name. It's the classic musician's fairy tale.

"But it is a fairy tale and, for every new artist who is discovered by a major record label, there are thousands who aren't. For the rest of us, pursuing a career in music is hard. Now, proposed new royalty rates for Internet radio threaten to make it harder.

"You see, our Americana band Tangleweed (pictured below) was 'discovered' — just not in a nightclub by an industry executive. We were discovered on Pandora.com by bookers for a huge music festival...

tangleweed"With more than 7 million Internet radio listeners every day, Internet radio offers exposure for groups like ours that just isn't possible on mainstream radio stations.

"But now we're at risk of losing it...

"While music artists certainly benefit from royalties, this kind of royalty rate hike will mean bankruptcy for almost every Webcaster. Music is a labor of love for many Webcasters, as it is for so many musicians. A significant number of small Internet radio stations already operate at a loss; they carry on because of their commitment to the music they play. A dramatic rate hike is more than most can bear.

"Right now, independent artists make up less than 10% of what's played on broadcast radio, but on Internet radio, we make up about 37%.

"The reality is if our representatives in Congress allow these new royalty rates to go into effect — and snr.orgit's within Congress' power to decide — it'll make it far harder for independent artists like us to make it...

"While we've become believers in Internet radio for selfish reasons — as both artists and listeners — the principle of creating a marketplace encouraging chicago tribuneartistic entrepreneurs stands on its own...

"Killing Internet radio will not only stifle the great technology we have now, it will also stifle the innovation of even better, newer and more exciting ways to enjoy music — and that's nothing but bad news for all of us."

Read the entire op-ed at the Chicago Tribune.


We'll send you a brief daily summary of each day's stories with a clickable link to the RAIN home page.


Headline: "CRB ruling pays 'corporate giants,' not indie artists, labels"

From the Seattle Times editorial section: "Sunday could be
a dark day for Internet radio. A new royalty structure begins that will wipe out the small budgets of many Internet radio stations.

"This assault on one of the last escapes from bland commercial radio could be avoided if Congress acts on a bill introduced by Rep. Jay Inslee (pictured right),... It should be an easy vote for Congress, if it is concerned about democracy. The new rate structure will silence voices on the Internet that have been squeezed off the consolidated radio dial. What makes the rate structure imposed by the CRB so unseemly is that it was suggested by SoundExchange, the entity that collects and distributes royalty fees.

"The new system increases Internet radio royalties by treating the stations like download services. Stations will now have to pay more for every song played, then multiply that fee soundexby the number of people listening. The current structure has performers being paid every time a song is played...

"The new fees are not about paying artists, who should be properly compensated. This is about SoundExchange and the corporate giants that dominate the music industry, controlling what is heard and the channels through which music is delivered.

"Small Internet radio stations will not be the only casualties. Public broadcasting stands to lose a vehicle that broadens its reach. Many public seattle timesbroadcasters use the Internet to complement their radio news programs...

"If Congress is serious about a healthy democracy, it will strike down the CRB's rates, and allow for a diversity of voices to be heard through the Internet. The time to act is now."

Read the entire editorial at the Seattle Times.

Advertisement


Have an opinion? Drop us a note! (Or, to use your own e-mail software, click here.)

  Your e-mail address:
  Your name (if not obvious from your e-mail address):
    Kurt and Paul, this is deep background -- don't quote me!

        Thanks!


 

Reader FeedbackThanks to all the RAIN readers for the kind feedback on our essay from yesterday, "True goal of SoundEx offer: Screw artists and indies?", which you can read here...

"A brilliant, but morally corrupt plan..."


Kurt,

Your analysis of this situation is correct. The point of this exercise is to cripple the independent artists and their record labels -- a brilliant, but morally corrupt plan. If a few thousand webcasters are taken out in the process, I guess we're what the military would call collateral damage.

 

Key56 Internet Radio




"I would love to see SoundExchange's response to your post..."


I would love to see SoundEx's response to your blog post (summarized in the 7/9 RAIN newsletter).

I doubt we'll see it, though, since they've been notoriously bad throughout this royalty debate about sidestepping the questions put to them and repeating the same non-answers.

 

Joe McCauley




"Killer editorial... I'm pumped..."


Kurt,

A killer editorial today!!! I'm pumped again.

 

Jerry del Colliano
Inside Music Media




"You should make sure Rich Bengloff of A2IM sees your editorial..."


I think you should make sure Rich Bengloff of A2IM [see RAIN here] sees your editorial regarding SoundExchange's motives, and get him to comment, and print it.

And if he won't comment, print that too.

 

Pete Harris
Harris Radio




"Trying to position themselves to keep hold of their lucrative system..."


I hope you do realize that this is just the start of an oncoming war (in terms of the music business, I mean). Whereas, the 'Big-4' are trying to position themselves so that they (as well as their 'hidden-teams') can keep ahold of their 'lucrative system of being paid'; and at the same time, keep the wealth from musicians (and indie labels/stations), such as myself, who believe that it's time to take those reigns away from the corporations.

People, such as myself, work; and don't have to politick, as much. But I'm noticing that the corporations are doing a WHOLE LOT MORE 'politick-ing' these days, than work. They have total faith in their dollars, as compared to the musicians & deejays (who make & promote their 'breadmakers')...

 

Deep background only




"The Big 4 want total control over the popular media..."


Kurt,

Your analysis in Monday's issue of RAIN was brilliant. I too was bothered by my inability to answer the simple question "why is SoundExchange supporting rates that
so clearly don't work for anyone involved, including the artists and labels they supposedly represent?".

Now I have a clear and precise answer to that question, one that supports my conviction that what the big 4 media companies *really* want is a return to the 1990s, when they exercised total control over the popular media.

I thought that this was a futile quest on their part, and in the long run it will quite likely prove to be such, but the one-two punch of an impossible statutory rate, coupled with direct deals featuring a degree of content control, could get them a lot closer to that goal than I had imagined possible.

Without such a devious move on their part, the music space is moving inexorably toward a scenario where freedom of expression, creativity, and talent reign supreme.
A world where artists make a decent living, where truly creative radio programming can find a viable audience, where the input of music lovers exercises a powerful
degree of control over who succeeds and who fails.

In a world like that, there's no need for blood-sucking middlemen, phony celebrity hype, artifically restricted radio playlists, and payola. In other words, there's no need for the Big 4 music conglomerates.

Of *course* they're going to fight such a nightmare scenario with every Machiavellian legal maneuver at their disposal. I knew they were good at that sort of thing, but thanks to your insightful analysis I have a new-found appreciation for just how good they are.

 

Bill Goldsmith
RadioParadise




"You are the expert that understands the entire situation..."


Kurt,

You should be in charge of SoundScamExchange, er I mean SoundExchange. You are the expert that understands the entire situation, not the amateurs currently working for them.

 

Jimmie Vestal, CEO
Sand and Palms Music




"Extreme discounts in exchange for airplay... isn't that payola?"


Did I read you right when you said... "This set-up makes it possible for EMI, Warner, Sony-BMG, and Universal, sometime before 2008, to go to AOL Radio en masse and say, 'Tell you what we can do: Sign a private deal with us, promise to play our priority records, and we'll only charge you $24 million a year! (And we won't charge you any per-channel minimum fees.)'????

Let's see here, extreme discounts in exchange for airplay??? Isn't that... ummmmm... PAYOLA???

 

Robert Hantson

 
 
Upcoming conferences
August 17 & 18 BandWidth 2007: San Francisco
September 26-28 R&R Convention: Charlotte, NC
September 26-27 NAB Radio Show: Charlotte, NC
September 26-29 PRPD Public Radio Programming Conference: Minneapolis, MN
October 13

IBS Webcast Conference: Seattle, WA

October 20 IBS Webcast Conference: Boston, MA
October 25-28 College Broadcasters Inc. Natl. Conf.: Washington, D.C.
October 27 IBS Webcast Conference: Chicago
November 4-6 NAB European Radio Conference: Barcelona, Spain
December 1 IBS Webcast Conference: Fort Lauderdale, FL
December 8 IBS Webcast Conference: Los Angeles

Click Here for AccuRadio

Software for RAIN's daily e-mail reminders provided by:


 

 



PopStandards
PopStandardsWowcast




 
 

TOP

Copyright 2004, RAIN Publications, Inc. All rights reserved.
All logos and trademarks are property of their respective owners.

Your RAIN staff
  xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx  
Kurt Hanson
Publisher
Paul Maloney
Editor
Daniel McSwain
Assistant Editor