Save Net Radio
 
 
  Daily news and commentary on the key issues involving radio and the Internet Link to previous issuelink to next issue    
     

Contact RAIN
Feedback form
Ratecard

CRB coverage 2007:
CRB decision
SaveTheStreams
Legal options
Markey
Petitions
Copyright law
Canada?
Fred Wilhelms
[2] [3]
JPMorgan analyst
SaveNetRadio
Rehearing denied
SNR.org website
B'casters interests
Day of Silence?
What is "fair"?
House IREA
SX Point/Counter
July 15th D-Day
Hill walk recap
Senate IREA
Hanson/Simson
Offer to SCW
Berman/Coble
100th co-sponsor
File for stay
Noncomm offer
$1 bil admin cost


CRB coverage 2002:
CARP decision
Industry reacts
Industry stunned
Huge RIAA win
SJO editorial
Day of Silence?
Congress support
Day of Silence on!
Press coverage
Day of Silence
Librarian decision
Cuban speaks up
Labels: Die Now!
Forbes coverage
SWSA
SCW license


"The Future of
   Radio" series
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5

"Net radio frontier:
Ad sales" series
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5

UPDATED:
Internet radio
royalty basics


Copyright Law
DMCA
CRB 2007
 Webcast decision







Link to AndoMedia.com












































































Link to AndoMedia.com
























































We'll send you a brief daily summary of each day's stories with a clickable link to the RAIN home page.

 

 
day of silence

x
Plans are coming together for the webcasting community's "Day of Silence", scheduled to take place next Tuesday, June 26th.

Full details are available in yesterday's issue of RAIN here.

To register your webcast as a participant in the "Day of Silence", e-mail us: feedback@kurthanson.com
x




Headline: "Artists making Hill walk today to support webcasters"
BY DANIEL MCSWAIN
Artists continue to vocalize their support for webcasters, asking Congress to protect the diversity of music and value that Internet radio represents to their careers and to their fans through a number of public events and initiatives.

Over 30 artists traveled to Washington D.C.alongside members of the SaveNetRadio.org campaign today to meet with more than 50 lawmakers for a series of meetings meant to underscore the importance of webcasting to their careers and to listeners. Similar to the message delivered at the May 1 "Hill walk", [previous RAIN coverage here] the visiting artists urged lawmakers to support the Internet Radio Equality Act to keep the webcast industry from being decimated by the CRB rates.

snrToday's artists' "Hill walk" comes on the heels of an open-air concert Monday on the lawn of the U.S. Senate.

Reps. Jay Inslee (D-WA) and Donald Manzullo (R-IL), the original co-sponsors of H.R. 2060 [pictured above], were snr artist concertboth on hand at the event, as were a number of the artists visiting Congressional offices today.

Another example of the diversity of artists to be impacted by the CRB rates, a group of nearly 60 artists sent a letter last week urging members of Congress to "help save faith-based and Christian music on the Internet" by supporting the IREA.

SaveNetRadio.org members are also taking the initiative to sponsor activities in their own communities. Elise Nordling, director of the "Indie Pop Rocks" channel on San Francisco-based Soma.fm, has organized a concert event that will bring artists, webcasters and listeners together in support of the Net radio. The event is scheduled for July 1st at the Bottom of the Hill, and is co-sponsored by popular indie rock webcast BAGeL Radio.


Webcasters remain
hopeful that a motion for a stay filed by various parties to the U.S. Court of Appeals could delay the implementation of the CRB rates until a solution is agreed upon. Today, the Department of Justice, speaking on behalf of the Copyright Royalty Board, officially opposed that motion for a stay, a largely procedural move that has no substantial impact on the appellate proceeding.

Webcast attorney David Oxenford wrote to RAIN in an e-mail: "Yesterday, I received the responses of the Department of Justice and SoundExchange to the Motion for Stay of the CRB ruling that we filed with DiMA and NPR...

"In case you were wondering, the DOJ is involved in the case as the representative of the Copyright Royalty Board.  In effect, our appeal is against the CRB, not SoundExchange.  SoundExchange is participating, as an intervener to support the CRB decision, but the other side of the appeal is actually the CRB. 

"That's the way it works in appeals of most agency decisions — appeals of the agency's decision are filed against the agency, not against the parties who might benefit from the decision."

Read Oxenford's Broadcast Law Blog here.

 
RAIN is brought to you today by:
Save Net Radio

Internet radio may be driven out of business within weeks by a Copyright Royalty Board decision that gives record companies a royalty rate that exceeds 100% of most webcasters' total revenues.

Visit SaveNetRadio.org for links to a petition to Congress you can sign, and to send the message directly to your Representative and Senators that you don't want to lose Internet radio!



BY PAUL MALONEY
A select group of the webcast royalty issue's most high-profile advocates, including RAIN publisher and AccuRadio founder Kurt Hanson, will air some of their differences on an industry conference panel this week near our nation's capital.

The panel, called "Webcasting Royalties: The Battle Heats Up," is scheduled for Friday as part of the fourth annual Digital Media Conference in Silver Spring, MD. The discussion takes place on the heels of webcasters' "Day of Silence" announcement (RAIN coverage here) and as the industry enters the "home stretch" towards July 15th, when 2006 retroactive royalties are due.

David Oxenford of Davis Wright Tremaine LLP, who represents small commercial webcasters (and is a frequent contributor to RAIN) will moderate the discussion. The music industry will be represented by SoundExchange general counsel Michael Huppe, American Federation of Musicians associate general counsel Patricia Polach (above left), and SoundExchange  board member Dick Huey of Matador Records (pictured right). Joining Kurt in speaking for webcasters is Digital Media Association executive director Jonathan Potter and NPR governmental relations vice president Michael Riksen (at left).

Other panels RAIN readers may find of interest include "The Digital Evolution of the Music Business: What's Next?" (featuring Pho group co-founder Jim Griffin and Clear Channel's Eric Siebert) and "Mobile Media: The Next Big Thing Beyond Ringtones" (moderated by Ted Cohen). The conference keynote speakers are Photobucket CEO Alex Welch and filmmaker Robert Greenwald. Registration details are available here.


We'll send you a brief daily summary of each day's stories with a clickable link to the RAIN home page.



Headline: "Hanson, SoundEx board member Rosenthal debate in L.A. Times"

This week, the L.A. Times is featuring a series of "point/counterpoint" exchanges between RAIN publisher Kurt Hanson and SoundExchange and RAC board member Jay Rosenthal regarding numerous issues underscored by the CRB ruling, la timesincluding the purpose and need for copyright, fair compensation to artists, and royalty structures that would allow the booming webcast industry to continue growing apace.

Today's installment, the last of the series, asks the question: "The entertainment industry’s legal successes against Napster, Grokster, etc., have failed to slow plummeting sales. How will cracking down on web radio be any different?" The articles were featured in this week's "Dust Up" feature in the Opinion section of the paper. You can
read our excerpts from yesterday's issue here.

From the L.A. Times: "
In their final exchange, Hanson and Rosenthal focus on the history of copyright lawsuits...

A smack in the head is what you should get!
BY JAY ROSENTHAL
"If I were you I would be a little put off by today's topic. It suggests that webcasters have a kinship with the online criminals from Grokster who hide from vanuatulawsuits and the authorities in the jungles of Vanuatu [pictured]... I really don't think that a 'free ride' webcasting community emulating the Groksters of the world should be viewed as offering a legitimate answer to plummeting sales...

"Do webcasters really want to emulate Napster and Grokster?... Do they really want to be part of a movement that has turned a generation of kids into a bunch of morally bankrupt punks who think they are entitled to free music? I don't think so, but sometimes I am not sure.

"To some this may sound crazy, but I sincerely am starting to hate the Internet. [A]ll I see is a tidal soundexwave of artist abuse. And the thought of webcasters emulating the Groskters of the world, and being given a free pass just reinforces my view that the Internet is not becoming a beacon of light, but a cesspool of darkness...

"And now the question is why we don't allow webcasters to do the same thing as Napster and Grokster, but without protest. We should just back off...

"Anyone suggesting that webcasters be given a free pass because sales are still reeling after the experience of Napster and Grokster must believe that artists are lemmings racing for the cliff...

"This is no time to give into anarchy. We must stand for the proposition that the development of any new technology not incorporating the legal and moral obligation to pay artists for their music is an immoral and incomplete technology—deserving of nothing less than an energetic lawsuit, and perhaps a smack in the head."

Ay yi yi!
BY KURT HANSON
kh"...I think [today's question is] intending to ask whether it's in the music industry's best interest to respond to every new development with aggressive, hardball, take-no-prisoners lawyering...

"The best example of your industry's mode of self-inflicted damage—one that will be taught as a case study in business schools for years to come—is how you guys dealt with the original Napster...

"...The year in which Napster was at its peak was also the best year of album sales in the history of the U.S. music business!... Let me repeat: Your  best year ever!

"If you think like a lawyer, you see copyright infringement, so you file a $20 billion lawsuit (as you did) to try to stop it.

"But if you think like a marketer, you might observe that people were getting exciting about music again... and you would notice that sales were actually going up, and you might think, '...I gotta find a way to take advantage of this!'...

"So everyone who knew anything about technology told you, 'Don't shut down Napster... You'll be sorry! Don't do it!'

"But you could...so you did...

"Cracking down on web radio, as your industry is doing... is going to be another case study in business schools.

"This crackdown is actually even worse than the others, because in this case you guys probably riaareally know that Internet radio is good for you. But you're lawyers—deal guys and litigators. Your natural instincts are to 'win' as big as you can. Like the scorpion that bit the frog that was ferrying him across the river, it's your nature.

"And the result that's only a month away? You'll kill off 80% of the industry, CD sales will go down an additional notch, and then you'll complain that CD sales are declining. Just as with the Napster lawsuit, you'll win but you'll lose...

Who asked for royalty-free webcasting?
"You wrote
, 'And now the question is why we don't allow webcasters to use the music without payment.' That's a total mischaracterization! No one is asking that question!...

"I'd like to end my piece of our conversation for the week with one final story:

"Woman's caught in a flood, clinging to a tree. Two kids come by floating on a door, offer to help her; she says, 'No thanks, God will take care of me.' Big dog swims by, gets close to her in a helpful way; she says, 'No thanks, God will take care of me.' Woman drowns. She gets to heaven and asks God, 'Why didn't you take care of me?' God says, 'What? I sent you a two kids, a door, and a dog!'

"Now the record industry is complaining that sales are in decline. But God has created MP3 players that hold 20,000 songs. Plus introduced a new form of distribution system—download sales—that removes all of the costs associated with the shipment of physical goods. Plus created thousands of new radio stations in hundreds of 'long tail' formats... Record industry says, 'No thanks, I'm a lawyer; I'll litigate.' Record industry dies. It gets to heaven (maybe) and asks God, 'Why didn't you take care of me?' God says, 'What?!? I sent you iPods, download sales, and Internet radio!'"

Read the entire article at the L.A. Times.

 


Have an opinion? Drop us a note! (Or, to use your own e-mail software, click here.)

  Your e-mail address:
  Your name (if not obvious from your e-mail address):
    Kurt and Paul, this is deep background -- don't quote me!

        Thanks!


 

Reader Feedback
Here's more feedback on the dialogue between Kurt Hanson and Jay Rosenthanl in the L.A. Times last week...

"The entire government is supposed to serve the public interest..."


In his debate with Kurt in the LA Times' "Dust Up" feature, Jay Rosenthal of SoundExchange seems particularly intense in his comments about a "legislative solution" being "problematic". This comes across as the height of hypocrisy, since it was a "legislative solution" that designated the RIAA's agent as the exclusive toll collector for any and all online music. To do so was questionable at best at the time, but is even more inappropriate now. This organization now represents an even smaller oligopoly of large corporate entities, and ample evidence has surfaced to the effect that they neither control nor speak for a very large portion of the music business.

Even more galling is Mr. Rosenthal's assertion that the copyright law was not put in place "to serve the public interest". I've got news for him: the entire United States government is supposed to serve the public interest!

I'm not surprised that Mr. Rosenthal and the corporate potentates he truly represents are concerned about further legislation. What Congress giveth (in this case, based on false assumptions and misinformation), Congress can taketh away.

 

Art Marriott




"Your dialog should be the jumping off place for a serious public discussion.."


You did a marvelous job with (Wednesday's) installment [see RAIN here, original article here], and Rosenthal falling back on p2p as "the primary reason, if not the sole reason, for the depression we all face," peels the last shred of the facade off the bankrupt reasoning at work.

I think you were dead on target with your predictions about the long tail. The future of music is really in the establishment and cultivation of a stable musical "middle class." I didn't think one existed until I attended a Folk Alliance conference several years back and met thousands of artists who were making a living without a single dollar of label money behind them. They didn't have video budgets, but they didn't have to sell a million copies of a CD to break even. There weren't any Maseratis in the parking lot, but there were a lot of minivans that were completely paid for.

Jay Rosenthal is a smart guy. That is why I am so puzzled by his insistence that success in the music world can only be defined in the traditional way. Expecting that the public is going to be brought back to major label artists (like the RAC roster) through better marketing and more video content ignores the fundamental problem with what the major labels are putting out: the music just sucks. Some of it is cute, some of it is clever, but some of it is Paris Hilton and some of it is the Pussycat Dolls.

For all his talk about "branding" as salvation, this is what he's got to work with.

But he really has missed the true core of the brand issue. The real "brands" in the market are the legendary labels; the Blue Notes and Impulses of jazz, the Atlantics and Stax and Motowns of soul and REAL R&B, the Vanguards and Elektras of folk.
You knew when you picked up an LP from one of these labels that it meant something, even before you heard it. That's a brand. A Justin Timberlake frozen dinner is not.

Your dialog with Rosenthal should be the jumping off place for a serious public discussion of the fundamental issues you hit on today. If that discussion fails, it will be because no one on the side of Standard Operating Procedure can risk actually addressing your questions and getting around the "p2p is evil incarnate" point of view. And I fear there is a great chance that will be the result. Mores the pity.

And thanks for provoking this:

In my estimation, anyone not paying an artist a fair royalty or failing to get authority to use the music may love the art but they certainly don't love the artist.

I intend to quote Mr. Rosenthal the next time I have to start an audit for one of my clients.

 

Fred Wilhelms




"He just told the Internet broadcasting community to go fly a kite..."


Did he really just say: "hobbyists should find a new hobby"?

I think he just told the Internet broadcasting community to go fly a kite. Did I really just read that?

Oh no he didn't (snapping fingers...)!!

 

Mike W.




"They just want us to go away..."


I think Jay's comments are very telling. We should give him credit for at least being honest about one thing -- SoundExchange hates so-called "hobby" broadcasters.

Otherwise, how would they expect a station with a tiny amount of listeners whose sole purpose is to keep alive an overlooked genre of music (and making zero revenues) to pay giant royalties? They don't -- they just want us to go away. We "hobby" stations always suspected this was the case and now at least we have it in writing.

 

Yukon Jack
Destination Doo-Wop




"You're lecturing webcasters about poor business models?.."


Jay Rosenthal wrote:

"There is nothing wrong with the suggestion that a hobbyist should find a new hobby if he or she cannot afford the rates set by the Copyright Royalty Board. That doesn't appreciably hurt artists, indie or established, but puts everything into perspective and promotes a very simple idea -- webcasters must build business modals incorporating the rates set by the Copyright Royalty Board. Those rates will ensure that artists receive proper incentives to create new music. And if a hobbyist is still determined to engage in webcasting, then he or she must pay the piper or engage in direct licensing with artists and labels.

"If the hobbyists really loved what they are doing, then they should pay the going rate. One would think they would find great enjoyment in sharing an artist's music with the world and sharing some of their hard-earned money with the artist at the same time. Now that to me sounds like a satisfying hobby."

Wow — you claim your business is in a shambles and you're lecturing webcasters about poor business models?

Let's replace a few nouns and read this back to you, Jay.

There is nothing wrong with the suggestion that the recording industry should find a new business model if they refuse to adapt to the internet’s networked landscape. That doesn't appreciably hurt artists, indie or established, but puts everything into perspective and promotes a very simple idea – the record labels must build business models incorporating their customer’s insatiable desire and willingness to pay a fair rate for the entire universe of music they hold hostage. Those rates will ensure that artists receive proper incentives to create new music and bestow an unprecedented amount of income and profit for the labels. And if a label is still determined to engage in the practice of suing their customers and using copyright laws to prop up their falling bottom line, then they will pay the piper or simply cease to exist.

If the labels were really concerned with an artist’s financial well-being, then they should embrace, not stifle, the webcaster. One would think they would find great enjoyment in sharing an artist's music with the world and sharing some untold potential sums of money at their disposal with the artist at the same time. Now that to me sounds like a satisfying business model.

 

David Hill
Pearadio.com


 
 
Upcoming conferences
June 22 Digital Media Conference: Silver Springs, MD
June 28 - July 1 Conclave 007: Radio Under Construction: Minneapolis
August 17 & 18 BandWidth 2007: San Francisco
September 26-28 R&R Convention: Charlotte, NC
September 26-27 NAB Radio Show: Charlotte, NC
October 13

IBS Webcast Conference: Seattle, WA

October 20 IBS Webcast Conference: Boston, MA
October 27 IBS Webcast Conference: Chicago
November 4-6 NAB European Radio Conference: Barcelona, Spain
December 1 IBS Webcast Conference: Fort Lauderdale, FL
December 8 IBS Webcast Conference: Los Angeles

Search RAIN

(Hint: Use quotes)
Advanced Search

Click Here for AccuRadio



Software for RAIN's daily e-mail reminders provided by:


 

 



PopStandards
PopStandardsWowcast




 
 

TOP

Copyright 2004, RAIN Publications, Inc. All rights reserved.
All logos and trademarks are property of their respective owners.

Your RAIN staff
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx  
Kurt Hanson
Publisher
Paul Maloney
Editor
Daniel McSwain
Assistant Editor
Ralph Sledge
"Site of the Day" Editor