Save Net Radio
 
 
  Daily news and commentary on the key issues involving radio and the Internet Link to previous issuelink to next issue    
     

Contact RAIN
Feedback form
Ratecard

CRB coverage 2007:
CRB decision
SaveTheStreams
Legal options
Markey
Petitions
Copyright law
Canada?
Fred Wilhelms
[2] [3]
JPMorgan analyst
SaveNetRadio
Rehearing denied
SNR.org website
B'casters interests
Day of Silence?
What is "fair"?
House IREA
SX Point/Counter
July 15th D-Day
Hill walk recap
Senate IREA
Hanson/Simson
Offer to SCW
Berman/Coble
100th co-sponsor
File for stay
Noncomm offer
$1 bil admin cost


CRB coverage 2002:
CARP decision
Industry reacts
Industry stunned
Huge RIAA win
SJO editorial
Day of Silence?
Congress support
Day of Silence on!
Press coverage
Day of Silence
Librarian decision
Cuban speaks up
Labels: Die Now!
Forbes coverage
SWSA
SCW license


"The Future of
   Radio" series
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5

"Net radio frontier:
Ad sales" series
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5

UPDATED:
Internet radio
royalty basics


Copyright Law
DMCA
CRB 2007
 Webcast decision







Link to AndoMedia.com












































































Link to AndoMedia.com
























































We'll send you a brief daily summary of each day's stories with a clickable link to the RAIN home page.

 

 

CRB Update
Headline: "Leading indie music site urges support for webcasters"
From Pitchforkmedia.com: "As a Pitchfork reader, you're aware of the impact the internet has had on the ways in which music is discovered, pitchfork mediadisseminated, championed and discussed...

"But an integral part of that landscape — internet radio — is in danger of becoming drastically weakened or extinct, due to a new law...

"Net radio offers broadcasters the opportunity to do just about whatever they please — an impressive feat when contrasted with the focus-grouped farce that is most corporate-owned terrestrial radio in 2007.

"Here at Pitchfork, we think that turning people on to new music is pretty important. (Hell, it's what we do every day.) And losing web radio would significantly reduce exposure to new music. We think that sucks...

"Given all the less-than-honorable ways people acquire music through their computers, net radio snris practically saintly. It's mostly free, legal, and musician-friendly, paying royalties in the same manner as terrestrial and satellite radio, though not necessarily in the same amounts...

"These stations will likely crumble under the new rates, marking a silencing of an untold wealth of free expression and the transmission of new sounds.

"We're all for artists getting their due, and to that end, the argument for letting the decision stand has legs, in theory. The higher fees leveraged against broadcasters would ostensibly mean more dough for artists, although even that appears to be negligible. Reports vary, but the average artist's payout after the rate increase will still only be in the neighborhood of a few hundred bucks per year. And is that really worth the price of untold numbers of small broadcasters being put out of business?...

"Net radio's vast listenership has cried foul, and now, some parts of Washington seem to be catching on. Bills have been introduced into both the House and Senate...

"To support these bills, call or write your local representative, or pop on over to savenetradio.org, the leading website in the struggle against this decision, for more information.

Read the entire article at Pitchforkmedia.com.

 
RAIN is brought to you today by:
Save Net Radio

Internet radio may be driven out of business within weeks by a Copyright Royalty Board decision that gives record companies a royalty rate that exceeds 100% of most webcasters' total revenues.

Visit SaveNetRadio.org for links to a petition to Congress you can sign, and to send the message directly to your Representative and Senators that you don't want to lose Internet radio!

latest hr 2060 cosponsors

A total of 97 Representatives now back the measure.

Representative Ray H. LaHood
Illinois' 18th District
7th-term Republican
Representative Rick Larsen
Washington's 2nd District
4th-term Democrat
Key committee(s): Small Business
Representative Christopher S. Murphy
Connecticut's 5th District
1st-term Democrat
Representative Allyson Y. Schwartz
Pennsylvania's 13th District
2nd-term Democrat
Representative Jose E. Serrano
New York's 16th District
10th-term Democrat

We'll send you a brief daily summary of each day's stories with a clickable link to the RAIN home page.

 


Have an opinion? Drop us a note! (Or, to use your own e-mail software, click here.)

  Your e-mail address:
  Your name (if not obvious from your e-mail address):
    Kurt and Paul, this is deep background -- don't quote me!

        Thanks!


 


Reader Feedback
Here's feedback...

"There was no real 'reaching out' to webcasters... what a surprise."


From David Oxenford's comments about SoundExchange's "first step" and "negotiation through press release," I take it that there was no real "reaching out" to
webcasters over the past six weeks as John Simson said there was.

What a surprise.

 

Fred Wilhelms




"Wondering as to why Simson did not make this offer weeks ago..."


Thank you for writing about the recent offer made by SoundExchange. I appreciate
and agree with your skepticism, which I find healthy, indeed.

I am concerned that the two Representatives who prevailed upon SoundExchange to make the offer it made are themselves advocates of the DMCA. Quite honestly, in the face of impending legislation (H.R. 2060), I am wondering to what extent they are trying to salvage the "willing buyer, willing seller" standard contained in the DMCA.

And I am wondering as to why Mr. Simson did not make this offer several weeks ago, apparently, before these members of Congress convinced Mr. Simson to proffer an extension of the SWSA.

 

Sincerely,
Charles St. James
Radio Orenovscotia




"Why is SoundExchange penalizing my support?.."


I'm a Live365 webcaster... what of the webcaster who has a 100% negative cash flow? This is a hobby for me and I earn absolutely no income from my broadcast! And I'm willing to bet it is the same for the majority of webcasters.

Not to mention, to keep my station fresh, I literally purchase thousands of dollars worth of CDs. I only have arrangements with 3 or 4 indie labels who I only receive CDs from once or twice a year. So if my hard earned dollars are already benefiting the music industry and artists, why is the CRB and SoundExchange trying to penalize my support?

Ironically, if this rate hike goes through, my broadcast stops and I no longer purchase any new CDs. I already have enough music in my collection for several life times and do not need to keep lining the pockets of those greedy bastards.

 

Russell Rebman

 
 
Upcoming conferences
May 23-24 Mobile Entertainment Summit: Los Angeles
September 26-27 NAB Radio Show: Charlotte, NC
October 13

IBS Webcast Conference: Seattle, WA

October 20 IBS Webcast Conference: Boston, MA
October 27 IBS Webcast Conference: Chicago
November 4-6 NAB European Radio Conference: Barcelona, Spain
December 1 IBS Webcast Conference: Fort Lauderdale, FL
December 8 IBS Webcast Conference: Los Angeles

Search RAIN

(Hint: Use quotes)
Advanced Search

Click Here for AccuRadio



Software for RAIN's daily e-mail reminders provided by:


 

 



PopStandards
PopStandardsWowcast




 
 

TOP

Copyright 2004, RAIN Publications, Inc. All rights reserved.
All logos and trademarks are property of their respective owners.

Your RAIN staff
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx  
Kurt Hanson
Publisher
Paul Maloney
Editor
Daniel McSwain
Assistant Editor
Ralph Sledge
"Site of the Day" Editor