Daily news and commentary on the key issues involving radio and the Internet Link to previous issuelink to next issue    
     

Contact RAIN
Feedback form
Ratecard

CRB coverage 2007:
CRB decision
SaveTheStreams
Legal options
Markey
Petitions
Copyright law
Canada?
Fred Wilhelms
[2] [3]
JPMorgan analyst
SaveNetRadio
Rehearing denied
SNR.org website
B'casters interests
Day of Silence?
What is "fair"?
House IREA
SX Point/Counter
July 15th D-Day
Hill walk recap
Senate IREA
Hanson/Simson
Offer to SCW
Berman/Coble
100th co-sponsor
File for stay
Noncomm offer
$1 bil admin cost


CRB coverage 2002:
CARP decision
Industry reacts
Industry stunned
Huge RIAA win
SJO editorial
Day of Silence?
Congress support
Day of Silence on!
Press coverage
Day of Silence
Librarian decision
Cuban speaks up
Labels: Die Now!
Forbes coverage
SWSA
SCW license


"The Future of
   Radio" series
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5

"Net radio frontier:
Ad sales" series
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5

UPDATED:
Internet radio
royalty basics


Copyright Law
DMCA
CRB 2007
 Webcast decision







Link to AndoMedia.com












































































Link to AndoMedia.com
























































We'll send you a brief daily summary of each day's stories with a clickable link to the RAIN home page.

 

 


Headline: "Webcasters continue growth in February, March Arbitron ratings"
BY DANIEL MCSWAIN
Arbitron and comScore have released their latest Online Radio Ratings studies for the months of February and arbitronMarch.

Since January,
the comScore Arbitron ratings have included a group of independent webcasters that have banded together under the name "RL Select" (represented by the "Ronning Lipset Radio" graphic). The network , which is made up of GotRadio, Big R Radio, and 181.FM, is aggregated by the Ronning Lipset Radio ad rep firm.

The "average quarter hour" estimate, or AQH, is defined as the  estimated average number of persons tuned to a channel  for at least five minutes during a 15 minute period. It can be understood as "the number of people listening to a station at a specific moment."

Numbers formatted in this style denote either an increase or no change compared to the previous month's rankings.

RAIN's coverage of the ratings from the online radio ratings service Webcast Metrics, which covers a different set of webcasters, is here.

February 2007

comScore Arbitron
Online Radio Ratings
comScore
February 2007, Persons 12+, Monday-Sunday 6AM-Midnight
Rank Station/Network AQH Weekly Cume
1 Yahoo! Launchcast 175,400 2,219,900
2 AOL Radio 174,200 1,436,600
3 Clear Channel 85,900 1,191,400
4 Live 365 51,000 641,300
5 RL Select 20,600 669,800
Total:   421,300 4,967,500

February 2007, Persons 12+, Monday-Friday 6AM-7PM
Rank Station/Network AQH Weekly Cume
1 Yahoo! Launchcast 315,800 1,601,000
2 AOL Radio 276,700 901,200
3 Clear Channel 156,300 1,017,100
4 Live 365 88,200 436,200
5 RL Select 30,300 330,000
Total:   711,000 3,268,400

After modest growth in February, nearly all of the paneled webcasters enjoyed an upward tick in audience in March, with AOL Radio again swapping spots with Yahoo! Launchcast for the top AQH position in the rankings.

March 2007

comScore Arbitron
Online Radio Ratings
comScore
March 2007, Persons 12+, Monday-Sunday 6AM-Midnight
Rank Station/Network AQH Weekly Cume
1 AOL Radio 206,000 1,530,100
2 Yahoo! Launchcast 160,200 2,067,100
3 Clear Channel 92,100 1,214,300
4 Live 365 55,100 661,000
5 RL Select 25,300 733,900
Total:   421,300 4,992,100

March 2007, Persons 12+, Monday-Friday 6AM-7PM
Rank Station/Network AQH Weekly Cume
1 AOL Radio 317,300 939,900
2 Yahoo! Launchcast 281,800 1,452,400
3 Clear Channel 166,800 1,009,700
4 Live 365 94,600 455,200
5 RL Select 43,000 455,300
Total:   736,800 3,302,800


Past comScore Arbitron releases:
The following are links to previous RAIN coverage of the comScore Arbitron ratings reports:

January 2007
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005

November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
 


Have an opinion? Drop us a note! (Or, to use your own e-mail software, click here.)

  Your e-mail address:
  Your name (if not obvious from your e-mail address):
    Kurt and Paul, this is deep background -- don't quote me!

        Thanks!


Headline: "SoundEx pr campaign obfuscates Net radio's promotional value"
From an opinion piece in BusinessWeek.com, by Laurie Joulie, director of the Roots Music Association: "...I take great offense at the press campaign by proponents of higher royalty fees to label the movement to save Internet radio asroots music association  a cover for the greed of corporate-level webcasters.

"I'm a director of the Roots Music Assn., a group that works for the advancement of the independent music industry and encompasses a multitude of roots-based genres...

"Time after time, artists tell me: 'I just want the people to hear my music,'...

"As I write late on a Sunday night, I have just finished speaking with an independent artist who played no fewer than nine shows this past weekend and has never received a single royalty check in his three decades in the business. He was thrilled that tracks from his new album save net radiohad just been played four times in two hours on an Internet radio station. What matters to him is the priceless exposure...

"SoundExchange... would like the public to believe this is a battle between the artists and the webcasters. It most certainly is not. Artists inherently understand that when we proactively support the overall viability of the industry, we support them...

"The math is simple. Fewer avenues for airplay equal fewer opportunities for promotion...

"...To insinuate that the current proposed bill is nothing but corporate greed is shortsighted and self-serving. To depict small webcasters and other partners in SaveNetRadio as stooges is disingenuous.

"To imply that the Internet Radio Equality Act... is weighted in favor of large broadcasters is a misstatement. Indeed, it's most likely that the only business weekstations that would survive the proposed rate structure would be big broadcasters. It's the small broadcasters that will have to shut their doors."

Read the entire piece at BusinessWeek.com.

The above opinion piece is a response to SoundExchange director John Simson's own piece in BusinessWeek.com a few days prior. Our RAIN coverage of Simson' article is here.


We'll send you a brief daily summary of each day's stories with a clickable link to the RAIN home page.


Headline": "NPR affiliate lifts curtain on community-programmed webcast"
From the Chicago Sun-Times: "Chicago Public Radio opened a new chapter in local media history with the launch Monday of a unique interactive Vocalo.orgbroadcast and online format.

"Vocalo.org inaugurated its Web site and began live streaming, billing itself as a gathering place that offers a mix of interviews, commentary, music and personal accounts of 'life in our region.'

"Over the air, Vocalo.org will be heard on WBEW-FM (89.5), based in Chesterton, Ind...

"Chicago Public Radio continues to air its traditional news, talk and information format on WBEZ-FM (91.5)."

Read the entire article at the Chicago Sun-Times.

 


 


Reader Feedback
This first feedback item is regarding yesterday's lead story, "Robertson: New generation of webcasters will emerge post-CRB" (here)...

"CRB will kill the webcasters we most need to keep..."


Michael Robertson writes: "The temporary absence of the major-label song library may not be as crippling to Webcasting as you might think."

I'd like to think he's right, except for one thing: Aren't these crippling royalties payable retroactively? How are KCRW, SomaFM and all the other webcasting stations supposed to reach this blessed afterlife of direct deals with indie labels when first they're being required to pay more than 100% of their revenues for their 2006 broadcasts?

I don't turn to Internet radio to hear the latest by Britney, Beyonce or anyone else who's already getting plenty of airtime on FM radio. I'd suspect that any station bothering to stream Top 40 pop music is probably owned by Clear Channel or one of SoundExchange's other favorite strawmen. Instead, I'm afraid that the CRB's royalties will kill the webcasters we most need to keep: the small operators who are playing out-of-mainstream music and get little or no ad revenue.

Mr. Robertson thinks the new royalty structure will save them. He might be correct, but I'd much rather see Congress intervene and save us all the grand experiment.

 

"Karenia Brevis"


Ed. reply: Thanks for the e-mail. [note: karenia brevis, by the way, is the "red tide" organism]. Robertson is fully aware that the current crop of webcasters won't survive these rates, if they're left to stand. It's only a "new generation" of webcasters which would emerge and build their businesses with the full understanding of operating under the statutory scheme (and not do it). It's these not-yet-born webcasters who will live to see the day when copyright owners are knocking on their doors to get their music played (as is the case in with broadcast radio payola schemes). Perhaps these young turks will build us a monument. -- PM



"Ask (Judiciary and Commerce) Members... for a full chamber vote..."


I just received a personal letter from Congressman Mike Thompson (D-CA 1). I
worked for him as an intern for a while, and he responded pretty quickly about the
CRB decision.

He relates that House members are indeed receiving a lot of correspondence about
this, and says that he is urging other Members to cosponsor H.R. 2060 along with him.

It's especially important now for constituents with Member representatives in both
the House Judiciary and House Energy & Commerce to write and ask their respective Members to send this bill through for a full House chamber vote.

Similarly, constituents should contact their Senators, but especially those states with members in the Senate Committee on Judiciary and likewise tell them to approve S. 1353 for a full Senate vote.

 

BD




"Bring the big guys up to speed on the basic 'bullets'..."


At the NAB they often have sessions called “Engineering for General Managers.” This is designed to bring the big guys up to speed on the basic bullets without them having to go back to college for their EE. Why don’t you do the same thing for execs regarding the current web copyright brou-ha-ha? I’m sure it would be greatly appreciated.

 

John Silliman Dodge
Program Director, All Classical Radio



This feedback is in regards to SoundExchange executive director John Simson's editorial in BusinessWeek.com (RAIN coverage here)...

"Why should SoundExchange have any say one way or the other?.."


I found Simson's piece to be so disingenuous, I nearly laughed the entire way through.

I thought that SoundExchange was supposed to be a non-profit, impartial royalty distribution corporation. Why should SoundExchange, whose responsibility is
to DISTRIBUTE royalty payments, have any say one way or the other in the royalty
rates set by a government-mandated body? Is it not up to the music industry via the
RIAA to lobby
for rates they see as fair?

Also, I would like to suggest that response editorials be sent to Business Week,
Washington Post, and any other publication that Simson sees fit to spew his
propaganda on. The best way to combat a falsehood is to blow the truth up in its
face
. Simson needs to be held accountable for his misrepresentations and inaccurate statements.

 

David Young

 
 
Upcoming conferences
September 26-27 NAB Radio Show: Charlotte, NC
October 13

IBS Webcast Conference: Seattle, WA

October 20 IBS Webcast Conference: Boston, MA
October 27 IBS Webcast Conference: Chicago
November 4-6 NAB European Radio Conference: Barcelona, Spain
December 1 IBS Webcast Conference: Fort Lauderdale, FL
December 8 IBS Webcast Conference: Los Angeles

Search RAIN

(Hint: Use quotes)
Advanced Search

Click Here for AccuRadio



Software for RAIN's daily e-mail reminders provided by:


 

 



PopStandards
PopStandardsWowcast




 
 

TOP

Copyright 2004, RAIN Publications, Inc. All rights reserved.
All logos and trademarks are property of their respective owners.

Your RAIN staff
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx  
Kurt Hanson
Publisher
Paul Maloney
Editor
Daniel McSwain
Assistant Editor
Ralph Sledge
"Site of the Day" Editor