Today
we're featuring some of the press coverage from yesterday's
important Senate Judiciary Committee hearing. If you've come
across some particularly good media coverage, please feel free
to let us know (you can e-mail us here).
Thanks!
Also, in case you missed it, we have pertinent excerpts
from each participant's testimony. They're in yesterday's RAINhere.
From the Associated Press in Yahoo!: "A federal plan that
could force Internet radio stations to pay high royalties on the
songs they play would lead to the death of the emerging business,
industry advocates said Wednesday.
"'No one, neither the creators nor the webcasters, benefits
from artificially inflated rates that only a few webcasters can afford,'
said Jonathan Potter, executive
director of
the Digital Media Association.
"However, recording industry representatives told the
Senate Judiciary Committee that musicians shouldn't subsidize webcasters
by not being paid fairly for songs played on Internet stations.
"'Webcasters can succeed while compensating the creators of
the sound recordings upon which they have built their business,' said
Hilary Rosen, chairman and CEO
of the Recording Industry Association
of America.
'It is obvious that without sound recordings, there would be no webcasting
business...'
[Chairman Senator Patrick] "Leahy suggested that Congress
might step in again. 'Why can't everyone, Congress and
artists and labels and webcasters alike, take the CARP as a genuine
learning experience and sit down and determine what is the next best
step?' he asked."
CNN is running this AP story as well on their site here.
As of 11:37am CDT, here are voting results for a poll being taken
in conjunction with the story.
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
From CBS Marketwatch: "Proposed artist compensation
fees will shut down independent Internet radio,
Webcasters told Congress on Thursday.
"'Property royalties are almost three times all our other
operating expenses, said Frank Schliemann,
operator of the small Vermont Webcaster Onion
River Radio. 'We will be bankrupted by royalties...'
"Webcasters and industry advocates argued the CARP decision
only took into account the
interests of big players like Yahoo
and AOL Time Warner,
which generate billions of dollars in cash flow. But most Webcasters
are tiny independent operations, sometimes run as hobbies, without
large revenues.
"The issue has been especially complicated for AOL,
which benefits from Webcasting but also represents
recording artists through its Time Warner music holdings. More than
10 million people visited AOL in March to listen to music, according
to Jupiter Media Metrix."
This entire article is available at CBS Marketwatch here.
From Reuters in USA Today: "Internet radio stations
warned Congress on Wednesday that a proposed royalty rate that could
take effect next week would probably drive many of them out of business.
"Backed by data from market-research firm Arbitron,
online radio stations who 'Webcast' music over the Internet told
the Senate Judiciary
Committee that a rate proposed by a U.S. Copyright Office panel
would require them to pay out more money than they could possibly
take in from advertising...
"Recording companies said they could live with the royalty
rate, although it was lower than they hoped, and urged the committee
not to interfere with the Copyright Office's decision when it is
announced next Tuesday...
"Committee
Chairman Patrick Leahy, a Vermont
Democrat, said he...had not reached any conclusions about the royalty
rate. 'If I had the power right now to come up with a solution,
I'm not sure what that solution would be,' Leahy said."
From Reuters in USA Today. Read the entire article
here.
From CNet News.com: "Independent Webcasters and the
recording industry testified at a Senate hearing Wednesday over
a proposed royalty rate for online radio, just days before a federal
arbitration panel rules on a licensing regime for the new medium...
"At the hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee,
the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA)
testified that it supports Webcasting and wants online stations
to succeed. But it
said artists and record companies should be fairly compensated for
the performance of their music in this emerging media. The compensation,
according to the RIAA, should be determined through a fair process
and should be based on the market value of the sound recordings.
"'If Webcasters don't succeed, artists and record companies
stand to lose an important new revenue stream,' Hilary
Rosen, chief executive of the RIAA, said in her testimony.
With the music industry hit
hard by piracy, 'new revenue streams are more important than ever
in a world where new technologies are dramatically changing the
way people get and listen to music.
"The Webcasters, however, disagreed with Rosen's statements,
saying they are not asking for a free ride. They said they want
to pay royalties to recording artists and ensure all creators are
fairly compensated for their work. But they said the proposed fees
would be 200 percent of current revenues for most independent Webcasters,
forcing many to shut down.
"'It's disingenuous to say, "We want you to succeed,"
while at the same time asking for royalty rates that will ensure
bankruptcy,' saidKurt Hanson [pictured at last
Friday's U.S. Copyright Office roundtable], a publisher for Radio
And Internet Newsletter RAIN. 'Most Webcasters have no problem
in the digital world with a royalty being paid to artists or to
the copyright owners and, as Ms. Rosen says, at a "fair market
rate."'"
Read this entire article from yesterday in CNet News.com
here.