From the Wall Street Journal: "Early last December,
three of the world's biggest music companies launched a
counterattack against the rampant digital piracy that has gnawed
at their sales in recent years. It was called MusicNet,
a joint venture that would provide consumers with a legal alternative
to Napster Inc. and other freewheeling Internet song-swapping services.
"Within a couple of weeks, the results were clear, as
MusicNet Chief Executive Alan McGlade told the venture's board:
'The current version of the service is not viable...'
"It isn't hard to see why. MusicNet's main owners --
AOL Time Warner
Inc., EMI Group PLC
and Bertelsmann AG, along
with fourth partner RealNetworks
Inc., a Seattle software company -- created a service that lacked
just about everything that makes online music downloads appealing...Since
the launch, MusicNet has attracted only about 40,000
subscribers...
"So now, as free sites continue to attract millions
of users and before most of the public has even heard of MusicNet,
its backers are trying to fix it. 'The first offering was too clunky
and too consumer unfriendly to hold much hope for its success,'
says Richard Parsons, AOL Time Warner's incoming chief executive.
'So we are going to go back, and we will come out with a 2.0 product
which will be more consumer friendly, easy to use....This is a business
of trial and error...'
"In later talks with the music companies, Mr. McGlade
pushed the labels to offer features such as permanent downloads
and portability, according to people familiar with the matter.
Mr. McGlade also has laid out financial targets, according to these
people. With major expenses including antitrust attorneys, people
familiar with the matter say, Mr. McGlade is now seeking a total
of about $10 million more from the partners. In addition, these
people say, he wants to make MusicNet more attractive to distributors
and consumers, in part by lowering the minimum guaranteed amount
that the labels would receive for each song consumers download or
stream from the service...Meanwhile, Morpheus has been downloaded
89.3 million times, according
to Cnet Networks Inc.'s Download.com, while Kazaa has been downloaded
64 million times.
Read this article in today'sWall Street Journal,
or see it online here
(registration required). It's also temporarily available for free
from MSNBC here.
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
From the IWA press release: "Deploying the very technology
that gave birth to the industry it represents, The International
Webcasting Association (IWA),
in cooperation with TVWorldwide.com
announced a joint effort to produce two webcasts on important copyright
issues that may change the face of the webcast industry.
"In an effort to unite and inform its members and the
webcasting industry at large, the IWA will dedicate the second in
a series of on-line Worldwide Town Meetings of Webcasters to the implications
of the Copyright Office recommendations. This will be webcast
on May 9 from 1PM-4 PM EDT.
"This will be followed the next day with live coverage
of the U.S. Copyright Office's important roundtable discussion on
the proposed guidelines for webcasters to give the required notice
of copyrighted material they webcast and to maintain webcast records.
The roundtable will be held May 10 from 9AM-5PM EDT.
Furthermore, RAIN has learned the tentative panel topics for
the Town Hall Meeting:
"Overview of State of the Webcasting Industry and CARP
issues," "Legal and Regulatory Facts surrounding CARP,"
"Technology Issues and State of the Art in the Webcasting Industry,"
and "Call to Action; What the webcasting industry must do now."
From USA Today: "When the combined legal might of
the music industry squashed online music-trading pigmy Napster
last year, the industry said it was only protecting the just profits
of artists and recording companies...
"But new research undermines the assumption. By doing
so, it raises questions about the knee-jerk basis on which old industries
attempt to quash new technologies...
"It puts another chink in the industry's already hopelessly
self-serving argument that people shouldn't be able to freely exchange
music now in the same way they exchanged tapes and records in the
pre-digital era. If there's no profit involved, of course sharing
is appropriate. The industry, not the public, should be forced to
adjust...
"A compliant Congress that is well fed with campaign
contributions has altered copyright law in ways that could aid the
industry's case. But even without a court decision, the losers are
clear: music, movie and TV titans who'd rather fight the future
than evolve."
Read this editorial in today's USA Today, or online
here.
From the company press release: "Hiwire, Inc., the leading
provider of advertising technologies for streaming media, today
announced
that the company remains the market leader for ad delivery and ad
serving for Internet radio, based on acknowledged industry-leader
Arbitron's ratings
for March 2002.
"With over240 million ads
served in March, Hiwire and content partners are validating
streaming audio as a medium with reach and cume comparable to other
media plan components...
"Many of the top station groups, including ClearChannel,
use Hiwire technology to seamlessly insert and track audio ad spots
for more than 200 radio stations nationwide. Other top industry
streamers, such as Live365,
SurferNetwork,
StreamAudio, and
Beethoven.com, have
added their inventory to the Hiwire Ad Network, which now represents
over 41% of the available online
audio inventory. By comparison, the nearest competitor serves ads
for only 10% of the overall inventory, while remaining audio ad
serving companies represent less than 1% of the market..."
Note that Hiwire's quoted market share is calculated
against a base only of the Arbitron-measured webcasters (although
a Hiwire spokesperson says the percentage is similar among Measurecast-rated
stations as well).
This feedback is in response to yesterday's coverage of a report
that says file-sharing may actually encourage music sales (in RAINhere). Note
that this study is from Jupiter Research, and is not endorsed by
the record industry.
"Wouldn't
hear any of her music via traditional sources..."
Well, amazing how long it took the music industry to realize
not everyone is 'stealing' their product! I have found myself
buying a significant greater number of records, oops, CD's, since
I was sent home packing from the brick and mortar office to my new
virtual one. What I'm really finding is I'm not buying the most popular
artists that one hears on the radio, streaming or FM, but I will search
for artists I like, and then browse someone elses music list if their
tastes appear similar. My online purchase over the weekend were both
of Kasey Chambers LP's, and I probably wouldn't hear any of her music
via traditional sources.
And by the way, Napster is DEAD! I like WinMX, no spyware,
and as a general rule, very good connections and downloads with broadband.