BY
KURT HANSON
Hundreds of Internet radio stations and channels across America
are shutting off their music streams on Wednesday, May 1st, in a
"Day of Silence" to highlight their concern over the upcoming U.S.
Copyright Office ruling on royalty rates that may shut down or bankrupt
the vast majority of the nascent Internet radio industry.
The Librarian of Congress is required to set "sound recordings
performance royalty" rates for Internet radio stations by May 21st
and an arbitration panel (a "CARP") working for that office
has recommended
a rate of $.0014 per listener per song (or $.0007 for broadcast
simulcasts). Many webcasters say the proposed royalty rate is the
equivalent of 200% or more of their revenues.
By crying "Mayday! Mayday!" next Wednesday, we're
hoping that listeners
will take the time to contact their representatives in Washington
and ask those representatives to express their concerns to the Librarian
of Congress, delivering the message: "The
legislative intent of a statutory royalty rate was supposed to be
to ENCOURAGE the growth and diversity of the industry, not to kill
it."
Most webcasters are planning the May 1st "Day of Silence"
to begin at dawn in their time zone and end in late evening. Some
webcasters plan to go entirely silent, while others plan to replace
their music
streams with periods of silence interspersed with public service
announcements on the subject. (Some webcasters also plan to broadcast
or direct listeners to an all-day talk show on the issues produced
by WOLF FM's Steve Wolf.)
Webcasters who may not go silent but who plan to support
the effortwith heavy schedules of PSAs (that will include
a moment of silence e.g., "Here's
what Internet radio may sound like on May 22nd...")
include Beethoven.com
(classical), Live365.com
(various formats), ClassicalMusicDetroit
(classical), Shoutcast
(various formats),Winamp Radio (various formats),
and numerous other college
and noncommercial webcasters.
We're also hoping to add more terrestrial
broadcasters who stream simulcasts of their programming.
(If you're interested, see the sign-up
link at the end of this story.)
The RIAA has denied that the CARP's recommended royalty
rate will cause significant harm to the Internet radio industry.
But Beethoven.com's
Kevin Shively disagrees, noting:
"Here's an example of how the Carp's recommended rate would
decimate webcasters: For eight of the larger independent webcasters
Beethoven, Digitally Imported, Radioio, Radio Paradise, SomaFM,
3WK, Wolf FM, and Ultimate-80s we calculated that our total
hours streamed last year were 40 million
hours.
"During that period, our combined revenues were
$93,000. But according to the
CARP panel's recommended royalty rate, we'd owe a royalty to the
RIAA for the same period of $710,000!
On Monday, a letter signed by 20 key members of the US House
of Representatives was sent to the Librarian of Congress (see RAIN
coverage here),
expressing concern that the CARP proposal for webcasters is "both
contrary to the intent of the DMCA and Congress's general policy
not to stifle innovation on the Internet."
On May 1st, webcasters will listenerswill be encouraged
to call or write their state's two Senators and their district's
Congressman, asking them to add their voice to the effort to set
a royalty rate that will not destroy this nascent industry.
Banner ads and PSAs will be available to all participating
stations, and SaveInternetRadio.org
will be redesigned to specifically focus on the day's event.
Help
support this effort and help keep Internet radio from a
premature death!
If you'd like to add your station to the list of participating
webcasters who will be taking down their streams on May 1st,
or running PSAs on the subject interspersed with periods of
silence (or crickets chirping), or running Steve Wolf's talk
show, e-mail Kurt here
and we'll include you in future press releases.
BY PAUL MALONEY The US Copyright Office-imposed deadline to submit commentary
on the posted replies on their "Notice of Recordkeeping"
ruling is end-of-business tomorrow.
You can see the filed replieshere.
Unlike the CARP process, the reply and commentary window has been
open to anyone interested. The deadline for initial reply was April
5.
To help generate as much discourse on this matter as possible,
Susan Pickering of the International
Webcasting Association told RAIN that her organization's
legal counsel, Shaw Pittman
LLP, has offered to file reply comments for interested parties
(please see details below).
The "Notice of Recordkeeping" is a body of rules
proposed by the US Copyright office mandating specific information
that webcasters and broadcasters must supply to copyright owners
of recordings streamed on the
Internet. In addition to 18 separate pieces of information regarding
each musical selection, the Copyright Office notice calls for seven
data points on individual streamcast listeners, called the "listener
log" (the notice can be read here,
see RAIN coverage here).
Following an outcry over technical feasibility and possible
privacy law violations, the RIAA subsequently dropped their interest
in the listener log (see RAIN coverage here).
In addition to accepting public written comment, the Copyright
Office announced last week (in RAINhere)
that given the contentious nature of the matter, it would hold a
public roundtable to discuss it on Friday, May 10 in Washington.
As mentioned in the article
above, the IWA and Shaw Pittman have offered to hand deliver
to the US Copyright Office public comments
on the "Notice of Recordkeeping." The reports will
each be filed under separate covers, but hand delivered in one
batch, according to the IWA executive director Susan Pickering.
To have your filing hand delivered, please forward them
no later than 2 PM EDT Friday to:
Ms. Cynthia Greer
Shaw Pittman LLP
2300 N Street, N.W.
Washington, DC 20037
From Business 2.0: "Copyright owners have clashed
with new technologies for as long as there have been new technologies.
During the past century, US courts have been reluctant to outlaw
the new gizmos, leaving plaintiffs to reach some accommodation with
the innovators. In more recent years, however, the courts have been
far more disposed to side with content owners. Just ask Napster
and MP3.com.
1908 "Music
Industry vs. Player Pianos: Publishers claimed that companies
making paper piano rolls based on the publishers' sheet music were
violating their copyrights. The Supreme Court ruled that making
piano rolls was not close enough to publishing music to be prohibited.
Eventually Congress stepped in, establishing the 'mechanical license,'
which grants anyone the right to reproduce another's published music
in return for a royalty set by law.
1931 "Music Industry vs. Radios: A group of composers claimed
that the LaSalle Hotel in Kansas City violated their copyright by
replaying a recording of some of their songs on the hotel radio.
The court disagreed, saying that while the hotel couldn't perform
their music without permission, it could play it on the radio...
1984 "Movie Industry vs. VCRs: ...'The VCR,' said Jack Valenti,
then as now the chairman of the Motion Picture Association of America,
'is to the American
film producer and the American public as the Boston strangler is
to a woman home alone.' Home video on VHS and DVD now accounts for
about a third of Hollywood's revenues."
Read this entire piece in the May issue of Business 2.0,
or online here. Sal Lepore of Cyberradio2000.com
did some excellent research on these topics, and recommends this
piece from The American Spectator here.
BY PAUL MALONEY
The Future of Music Coalition, the artist and technology
lobby, has published a "Frequently Asked Questions"-type
primer
on the CARP (Copyright Arbitration Royalty Panel) as part of their
website (here).
The document provides straightforward and factual answers to
various questions regarding the nature of the CARP and webcasting
royalty rates, reporting requirements for webcasters, and webcasting
license requirements. The document was put together with information
from various sources, such as the US
Copyright Office, SoundExchange's
website, the RIAA, and this
publication's SaveInternetRadio.org.
It should be noted that while the FMC has publicly supported
the CARP-determined webcasting royalty, it seems to be the
most flexible in terms of making allowances for the survival of smaller
independent webcasters.
In their reply to the US Copyright Office's "Notice of
Recordkeeping" (see story above), the organization wrote, "The
beauty of webcasting is its ability to be utilized by citizens and
small organizations without having significant resources. Clearly,
in this situation many stakeholders feel they have been underrepresented
in the process and we encourage you to reach out to these communities
to clarify both the proposals that exist and how citizens can best
engage in the policy process."