BY KURT HANSON In the previous two issues of RAIN (hereandhere),drawing from a speech, "The Future
of Radio," that I've been delivering
at radio conferences around the world lately (and which will have
its US debut at our "RAIN Reader Cocktail Party"
next week in Las Vegas), I've been making the following argument:
There are technological and cultural changes going on right
now that will have a major impact
on how consumers will access and use radio in the future...and
the U.S.'s radio broadcast group owners are understandably
but perhaps dangerously ignoring
those trends.
Today,we'll look at several
new technologies that are in the process of giving consumers
new choices. Tomorrow, we'll look at a theory espoused by a best-selling
author and Harvard professor that explains why broadcasters may
be betting on the wrong horse
and, in doing so, putting their entire companies at risk.
Three new delivery mechanisms
are getting
radio into the hands of consumers Just a few short years ago (about the time that Britney
Spears and the Backstreet Boys were breaking as successful pop acts
in other words,
barely yesterday), consumers could get radio via AM
or FM. That was it.
But clearly that is no longer the case, as three new delivery mechanisms
are rolling out right how that offer consumers "new" bands
of radio.
First, satellite radio (XM
and Sirius;
Sirius ad pictured at right, Sony XM radio pictured below) now offers
consumers who are willing to pay for it over 200
channels of music and talk using a total of five dedicated
satellites.
About 16 months after the commercial launch of the industry,
the two services are up to a combined total of over 500,000
subscribers. (This suggests they have a Mon-Sun 6AM-12M AQH audience
of about 100,000 listeners,
assuming the radios are in use an average of 3 hours per
day with 1.5 listeners per radio).
I believe the jury is still out as to whether mainstream
(as opposed to audiophile) consumers will pay
$200+ for the radios and $9.99 to $12.95 per month for the service.
Certainly, however, it will become a lot
easierto sell as
new car salespeople begin to sell the product as a factory-installed
option, perhaps with the monthly fee buried as part of the financing
package of the vehicle itself.
Broadcast group owners
are betting on digital Second, meanwhile, most radio group owners here in the US
and around the world are placing their bets on digital
radio (a/k/a DAB or "HD Radio") transmitted
on a completely new set of frequencies in most parts of the world,
"riding along" with existing AM and FM signals in the
U.S. (Although from a consumer's point of view, even in the US,
digital radio will look like new
frequencies different buttons on the radio, just like the
"AM" and "FM" buttons.)
These new signals are already available to tens of millions
of consumers in Europe and millions of consumers in Canada, and
they'll be appearing in US markets this year.
However, as you may have learned when your cell phone switched
from analog to digital a few years ago, "digital" doesn't
necessarily mean "better;" it all depends on the quality
level that the provider chooses to use. (Example: 300
megabits per second of bandwidth can be used to broadcast one gorgeous-quality
radio channel or five relatively-crappy channels. Right now, for
example, the Canadian plan is to use that amount of bandwidth to
offer one gorgeous-quality channel,
but to the extent that a percentage of Brits are embracing DAB,
the driving factor seems to be the new
channels that the BBC is offering.)
So will consumers embrace digital radio in the US? I am personally
skeptical. Admittedly I am not an audiophile, but
I personally do not notice the difference between FM
quality and CD quality when I switch back and forth between the
two on either my home or car stereo. Nor do I notice a major quality
difference between listening to news and talk programming on AM
versus news and talk programming on FM (e.g., NPR). (Here's a clue
to the AM side of the question: There has never
been a commercial station
in America that became a success by offering news or talk programming
on a high-quality FM signal. Ever.)
So I suppose if radio station group owners and electronics
manufacturers and car manufacturers all get together and force digital
onto all car radios, I'll take it.
Buthow many years will
it take me to upgrade my clock radio, my home stereo receiver, my
FM Walkman, my cassette/FM Walkman, my office microsystem (pictured),
and my family room stereo system? Quite a few years, I imagine.
Meanwhile...
Wireless broadband Internet access
is racing its way towards consumers The third new delivery mechanism for radio is, of
course, Internet-based delivery.
It has a several-year head start over satellite and DAB and
several advantages that I believe may allow it to be the
delivery mechanism of choice for tens of millions of
radio listeners in the not-too-distant future.
Several new technologies are being simultaneously developed
that will get Internet-delivered radio into the hands (and ears)
of consumers..
First, of course, is the increasing popularity of broadband
access to the web (via DSL phone lines, cable, and satellite).
Households with broadband access have grown from 6.2 million in
2000 to a projected 30.5 million
next year and should surpass the number of dial-up households the
year after that. In addition, of course, tens of millions of office
workers have broadband access on their computers at work.
The second key technology is the rollout of "Wi-Fi,"
which for a very small investment takes a broadband connection
and extends it wirelessly within
a 300-foot range from its source. As Forbes magazine
pointed out a couple of weeks ago, the technology went "supernova"
last year, "selling 18 million connections one of
the fastest adoption rates of any consumer technology in history."
(See article here.
Wi-Fi router pictured at right.)
As you know if you've been following RAIN, that means you can
now connect to the Internet wirelessly (and, for example, listen
to Internet radio) in thousands of coffee shops, hotel
lobbies and rooms, airport concourses, libraries, cafes, airplanes,
and other public places... as well as throughout one's house (in
the kitchen, bedroom, etc.). And that number will grow exponentially
in the near future. Intel just launched a $300 million ad campaign
in support of their new Wi-Fi-enabled "Centrino" chip.
(CONTINUED BELOW)
RAIN is brought to you
today by:
Limelight Networks is a leading provider of outsourced media delivery
solutions. With multiple Edge distribution locations around the Internet,
Limelight Networks enables some of the Industry's top broadcasters like
Radio Free Virgin and Musicmatch to reduce the cost and complexity of
delivery while ensuring unmatched performance.
Limelight Networks technologyhas been
proven to dramatically cut the costs associated with live or on-demand
media delivery. For more information please contact us at www.limelightnetworks.com.
(FROM
ABOVE) Multiple approaches
may extend Wi-Fi's range The third key technology for extending the range of broadband
Internet will extend Wi-Fi beyond its 300-foot
range, and there are actually several different approaches
being developed to do that.
One approach, "mesh networking," takes advantage
of the fact that each Wi-Fi receiver is also a transmitter. So if
a Starbucks has a Wi-Fi system installed, Adam can access it from
250 feet away and transmit it 300 feet
further to Bob, who can transmit it 300 feet further
to Chris...There are logistical issues to be solved,
of course, but they are already
in the process of being solved, and once they are, once Wi-Fi users
in an urban area reach a certain density, Wi-Fi is essentially
everywhere.
Another approach, "phased-array antennas," takes advantage
of the fact that the actual limit on Wi-Fi distance is an FCC regulation
of the power of the transmission. It's a 300-foot limit if
the transmission is omnidirectional, but the same Wi-Fi
signal can reach numerous different users blocks
or even miles away if it's directed in a pin-pointed
manner. Again, this technology is already being rolled out.
And yet another approach is the development of new
Wi-Fi standards that will permit several miles of range
and easy access into fast-moving cars and trains. (The previous
two approaches use the existing "802.11" standard. The
new standards are called 802.16 and 802.20; see the previously-mentioned
Forbes article for details.)
Consumers need more than a signal; they also need a device In the discussion about satellite and DAB above, a critical
success factor was not signal coverage (which is probably a given)
but rather consumers'
willingness to buy the devices
needed to access the signal.
The intriguing thing about Internet-delivered radio is that
consumers ARE going to own
the necessary devices... because the necessary functionality is
going to be built into devices they're
going to buy anyway!
Think about it: Virtually every consumer with a PC already
owns the hardware they need to listen to Internet radio at their
desk. (There are only 500,000 satellite radios out there, but there
are tens of millions of PCs
that are effectively Internet radios out there.) Every laptop owner
with a Wi-Fi card is already carrying around with them, effectively,
a 10,000-channel transistor radio. And within just a couple of years,
virtually all cell phones and PDAs are going to have (A) the Wi-Fi
access and (B) the media player software required to turn them into
Internet radios too.
What does this mean? It means that there's going to be a
"tipping point" coming up in the next couple of years
in which many tens of millions of Americans
(those who are carrying a Wi-Fi-enabled PDA or cell phone or laptop
with them, or who are working on a broadband-equipped PC) will find
it easier to listen to radio on their Internet-enabled
device than on a stand-alone AM/FM radio!
(And then don't forget the other advantages we discussed
yesterday that Internet-delivered radio can offer, but satellite
radio and HD Radio can't an unlimited
number of format choices, the ability
to add interactivity and personalization,
etc. So the Internet-delivered approach may not only be more convenient,
but also preferable.)
Tomorrow: The Innovator's
Dilemma Tomorrow in RAIN, we'll look at a thesis by a best-selling
author and Harvard professor which holds that there is a certain
type of technological change that typically leads to a situation
in which virtually all of the leading firms
in a given industry arewiped
out (because, ironically, they follow traditionally smart
business practices).
And we'll explore the possibility that Internet-delivered
radio may be a perfect example
of that exact type of technological
change.
TO BE
CONTINUED...
Read Part 4 of "The Future of Radio" here.
The series begins here.
The
U.S. debut of Kurt's "The Future of Radio" speech
(in a slightly-condensed preview version) will take place next
week in Las Vegas, immediately preceding the RAIN
Reader Cocktail Party at Gordon Biersch Brewery Restaurant
(Tuesday, April 7th, at 5:15PM). To reserve a seat for the presentation,
call 1-312-527-3879 or write
kurt@kurthanson.com.
If
you're planning to attend NAB 2003 in Las Vegas (April 5-10;
details here),
we hope you'll join us for our RAIN reader get-togther.
We've reserved the patio of the Gordon Biersch Brewery Restaurant
(about a $4 cab ride from the Convention Center) on Tuesday,
April 8th.
This year, we've also reserved a private room for the U.S.
debut of Kurt's "The Future of
Radio" speech for those who'd like an advance
look at it. (Presentation at 5:15pm, cocktails at 5:45pm.) See you there!
BY PAUL MALONEY While individual Clear
Channel stations are making their own decisions regarding
their streaming plans, the company is
considering a subscription-based
solution for the future, based on the geographic location of the listeners.
VP/Technology at Clear Channel Brian
Parsons verified to RAIN the information he posted
to an industry newsgroup on the matter.
In response to a question regarding the possibility of a Clear
Channel subscription-based streaming plan, Parsons (left) told Yahoo!'s
"Streaming Radio" group that, under the proposed plan, listeners
would connect to narrowband streams of stations in their broadcast
market for free, or could elect to pay a subscription fee for a higher
bitrate feed. Listeners who'd like to hear Clear Channel stations
in other markets would pay to listen (and have the choice of narrow-
or broadband streams for different prices).
The plan is seen as a possible step towards a solution to the
high cost of delivering programming over the
Internet. While the cost of bandwidth remains a significant concern,
the larger problem, according to the company, is the high
royalty rates for the use of copyrighted music. RAIN
reported in January (here)
that the company had decided to shift the financial responsibility
for webcasting to the individual stations, which led to approximately
150 stations to just turn it off.
Those CC stations that continued (or have since returned to)
webcasting have been formulating their own approach to the matter.
Radio & Records
reports today that while KIIS-FM/Los
Angeles and WZTA/Miami continue to operate with Hiwire
(the streaming ad-insertion company with whom Clear Channel struck
a deal in June 2001 (see RAINhere),
and another deal early this year that brought several more CC stations
back online (in RAINhere)),
several other stations have moved on to other providers.
For example, KRFX/Denver now has a deal with local firm Liquid
Compass, and WGST/Atlanta, in the process of setting
up with Chaincast/StreamAudio,
has temporarily moved all their streams to Smartech.
New York stations like WAXQ, WHTZ, and WKTU remain offline
however. Parsons tells RAIN that it's simply a matter of costs
large audiences (with a significant number from overseas) add
up to big streaming and royalty bills. But that could change if the
company's subscription plans works out.
The National Association
of Broadcasters is appealing the rule that makes broadcast
radio responsible for streaming copyright royalties.
The industry group argues that free radio is in the public interest,
but royalty fees create a financial disincentive to stations to stream,
thus listeners are deprived of local signals just because they choose
to listen via the Internet. Should the Court agree with the NAB, it
would open the door for broadcasters like Clear Channel to once again
offer free streams, at least to local listeners.
Parsons revealed that his company is testing a "location
verification" system not based on IP addresses
to determine where listeners are, and thus which stream they'd be
allowed to hear for free, and which would require subscription.
"The monthly fee would be low and give you access across
the brand," Parsons wrote. In other words, listeners could purchase
subscriptions to all out-of-town "KISS" (CHR) stations,
"Mix" (Hot AC) stations, and/or all CC News/Talk stations.
"As we said in the beginning of the year, this is just
one of the steps in the process," he told RAIN. "Hopefully
in a few months, you'll see another step, and then you'll get a better
picture of how the (streaming) solution is coming together."
From Wired.com: "To say that Ken
Rutkowski loves technology is an understatement. "Rutkowski, the host of online technology radio show,
KenRadio,
is obsessed...
"With
110,000 listeners, he's managing to make ends meet at a time when
many Internet radio stations are fighting for their lives. As the
recording industry attempts to squeeze royalty fees out of struggling
online stations, these same stations are losing listeners to war coverage
on television...
In 1999, after several years of reporting on technology issues
for Chicago-area radio stations, Rutkowski [pictured left] approached[co-host Andy] Abramson,
a publicity manager with a keen interest in wireless technology, to
do a radio show on the Internet.
"He andAbramson launched KenRadio the following
year. Since then, the duo said it has claimed about 110,000 listeners.
While Abramson runs his own marketing and advertising communications
agency on the side, Rutkowski makes
his living at KenRadio from sponsorships and speaking engagements."
Read this entire story from Wired.com's site today here.