... Please look to our site "Save Internet Radio"
as well as RAIN tomorrow for an important development
in the industry's effort to make the Copyright Office, legislators,
and other important government officials aware of what our industry
is facing. ...
From The Village Voice: "You have to be pretty desperate
to attack your industry's most enthusiastic potential customers,
especially
in the middle of an economic downturn. But that's exactly what National
Academy of Recording Arts & Sciences president Michael Greene did
with his already infamous speech at last month's Grammy Awards,
transcribed at the official Grammys ...
"Greene took the industry's frustrations out on fans,
raging against 'musical dreams haplessly snared in this World Wide
Web of theft and indifference.' Metallica and Dr. Dre's lawyer Peter
Paterno put it less floridly in The New York Times: 'If I were in
charge, I would put viruses everywhere on these services. That would
stop Little Johnny from stealing this stuff.'
"Jeff Harris is one of those 'Little Johnnys...' He
buys CDs less than once a month these days, he says, although he's
purchased a bunch based on files he downloaded — the Strokes, Blur,
Heart, Bauhaus — and many of his MP3s are copied from CDs he owns,
which makes them legitimate. Jeff has heard of people downloading
entire albums and burning them onto CD-Rs, but he's never done it
himself.
"'I try not to think of the moral implications,' he says.
'But I'm not sure if the RIAA [Recording Industry Association of
America] understands what the music industry should really be about...Harris
is especially annoyed by the new wave of copy-protected CDs that
don't play in computers: 'I like to own the actual physical object,
and also to
be able to take [the music] with me or play it on any system...'
"Record labels can frame this situation in a couple
of ways. One interpretation is to consider unauthorized file trading
as straight-up theft; the other is to treat it as a cheap and easy
promotional tool — and the gateway to a new market...
"Peer-to-peer music trading may never be as big an issue
as its opponents fear. If you're downloading illicit MP3s on a significant
scale, you probably have (1) a very fast Net connection, (2) not
enough money to buy CDs, and (3) lots of time to wrestle with recalcitrant
software, hardware, and networks. Which means you're probably a
college student. At a certain intersection of disposable income
and spare time, it makes much less sense to go through the hassle
of downloading an album's worth of songs, burning a CD, and printing
artwork than it does to buy the damn thing...
"So what will actually emerge from the chaos?..The best
bet is that the whole kerfuffle will blow over, the same way the
home-taping issue did years ago. The major labels will offer their
own downloads in a form that the market demands and basically ignore
the peer-to-peer underground. Young people will keep exchanging
sound files with each other, then graduate and get jobs and crave
physical artifacts and pay for most or all of their music."
... We think that this article is excellent and was worthy
of a short respite from "all-CARP, all the time."
Yet at the same time, it speaks to the topic of webcasting too.
In fact, it does a nice job (especially if you follow
the link and read the entire piece, not just we've excerpted)
of giving our "webcasting-focused" eyes a view of
the bigger picture of the position in which major record labels
now see themselves. In the words of a colleague, as
far as the recording industry is concerned, "everything's
broken."
An immediate conclusion one might draw is that like the
industry lashing out at an inappropriate target (the music consumer)
over file-sharing, their energy is equally misdirected when
it comes to trying to squeeze webcasters for exorbitant royalties.
Is it possible that, with a wildly uncertain future, labels
are grasping at straws for survival?
Yet isn't it interesting that despite evidence that file-trading
might actually help promote artists and encourage record sales,
labels see crushing it (and attacking their customers) as their
only course of action? The parallel to draw is that despite
the promotional opportunity presented by webcasting, the record
industry is intent on alienating those that could actually help
them to simply maintain their way of life.
Whether the situation the labels are in is truly "life
or death" doesn't matter. They see it as such, and they
won't hold back when it comes to defending themselves, or developing
new revenue streams. -- PM ...
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
From a press release: "With a motto of 'matching
those who need streaming services with those who provide
them,' Blue Falcon Networks,
Vendaria, and VitalStream
are among the initial charter members of the Streaming Chamber of
Commerce.
"'Just as the Chamber of Commerce in your city works
to develop and grow the economic fortunes of various businesses
in your community, the Streaming
Chamber of Commerce does the same for streaming oriented
companies and enterprise corporations,' says founder and chairman
Mark Bingaman...
"The Streaming Chamber of Commerce is focused on educating
enterprise companies, and emulating the business practices and organizational
networking that they understand...
"Enterprise firms, educational, and governmental groups
may request streaming information, referrals, and free advice [here].
Streaming companies may request membership applications at the same
address."
Read the entire press releasehere.
Bingaman is former associate editor of Streaming
Magazine.
From CNet News.com: "Internet video and audio pioneer RealNetworks
accused Microsoft
in court on Wednesday of
seeking to restrict RealNetworks' products because they posed a
threat to the software giant's Windows operating system monopoly...
"RealNetworks alleges that Microsoft withheld technical
data from RealNetworks to ensure that RealNetworks' audio and video
player would not work as well with Microsoft's Windows operating
system as the Windows Media
Player...
"Windows XP contains a function, [RealNetworks Vice
President David] Richards said, that allows users of Windows Media
Player to easily copy songs onto a CD and search their files for
a song. But Microsoft's tactics prevented RealNetworks' media player
from offering the same functions, he said...
"Microsoft attorney Richard Pepperman spent the afternoon
questioning Richards, looking to
undermine RealNetworks' claim of being a victim.
"Pepperman displayed one e-mail from Richards in 2000
that tells a RealNetworks sales executive that the company's media
player was 'ubiquitous,' and that 49 of the 50 top broadcasters
used the company's format for streaming media..."
Read this entire article from yesterday CNet News.com here.