 |


BY
KURT HANSON
Although it's a statistic not reported by
Arbitron in yesterday's release of its InfoStream Webcast ratings,
the true #1 Webcast in the report is ABC Radio Networks'
"Tom Joyner Morning Show," followed by WJZW/Washington
DC, WPLJ/New York City, 93X/St. Louis, and KQRS/Minneapolis.
The probable
reason that Arbitron chooses not to reveal the AQH audience sizes
of the Webcasts it rates is the size of the audiences: The
four radio station Webcasts listed above had AQH audience sizes,
generously assuming a 6AM-12MID broadcast day, of 175, 157,
147, and 124 persons, respectively. (Note that there
should not be a "00" behind those numbers, as is
the typographic convention in a printed Arbitron ratings report.
We're really talking about 175 people.)
Joyner's program, which is archived
daily and thus can be listened to at any time, has an
AQH of 200 persons if you assume that listening is distributed
throughout the 6AM-12MID broadcast day. On the other hand, if you
assume that all its listening occurs during the four hours
each weekday that the program is live, the show's Webcast would
have an AQH of 1226 persons.
The following chart shows how these calculations were derived:
I took each Webcast's monthly cume and multiplied it by that station's
Time Spent Tuning to get the total number of hours of listening
it received. I then divided that figure by the 540 hours in the
month of November (generously assuming only 18 hours per day) to
get each Webcast's AQH audience size.
|
Monthly
cume
|
|
Time
Spent
|
|
Tuning
|
|
(Hrs/Mins)
|
|
Total
hours of listening
|
AQH*
|
| Joyner |
32,700 |
3 |
18 |
107,910 |
200 |
| WJZW |
12,700 |
7 |
30 |
95,250 |
176 |
| WPLJ |
23,500 |
3 |
37 |
84,992 |
157 |
| 93X |
31,700 |
2 |
30 |
79,250 |
147 |
| KQRS |
17,200 |
3 |
53 |
66,793 |
124 |
| WEQX |
27,200 |
1 |
49 |
49,413 |
92 |
| KLOS |
21,600 |
2 |
12 |
47,520 |
88 |
| WABC |
22,700 |
1 |
56 |
43,886 |
81 |
| KGO |
20,800 |
2 |
04 |
42,987 |
80 |
| La
Mega |
14,600 |
2 |
40 |
38,933 |
72 |
| KABC |
18,500 |
2 |
06 |
38,850 |
72 |
| KSFO |
11,600 |
3 |
01 |
34,993 |
65 |
| WJR |
11,400 |
1 |
44 |
19,760 |
37 |
| Assuming
all Joyner was in a 4-hour period... |
| Joyner |
32,700 |
3 |
18 |
107,910 |
1226 |
| *
= Total Hours divided by the number of hours in November |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note that the
chart above is not a chart of all Webcasts in America. The
only Webcasts eligible were the 255 stations that participated in
Arbitron's InfoStream study in November, 1999 and for which server
logs were successfully processed -- roughly 10% of U.S. Webcasts.
(Stations streamed by NetRadio, OnRadio, and 31 of the stations streamed
by Magnitude Networks were measured but not included in the final
report due to problems with server logs.)
Furthermore, certain others of those 255 Webcasts measured
may have had higher AQH sizes than WJR; however, Arbitron supplied
the required data to do the above calculation only if a station made
the top 25 in both the Monthly Cume and Time Spent Tuning rankings.
More to follow later this morning. Read yesterday's story on
the release of the InfoStream numbers, including lists of the top-ranked
stations in each of the two categories above, here.
Feedback from RAIN reader
OK, I'm sure someone else has pointed this out, but I haven't
seen it yet.
All this is very silly to me... Yes, the InfoStream product
is at least a place to start. But to make assumptions like smaller
markets might benefit the most from streaming is crazy.
Remember, Arbitron is only measuring a handful of stations.
We can't let this mean a whole lot at the moment. It's like
looking at your market report with half the stations not rated.
Wouldn't it be a little odd to proclaim yourself No.1 in anything?
Yes, the numbers are numbly low, but what about the ones not
measured? There might be better news out there...or not.
Also I read a comment from someone about how the Internet could
never have enough bandwidth to serve all streaming stations.
Not true. Do some research on IP multi-casting. Technology will
usually find a way -- it just takes time.
Amy Van Hook
Director of Internet Operations
Entercom
|

To
read RAIN's coverage of the release of the October 1999
InfoStream report, select from any of the following stories:
More
to follow. Any comments or analysis you'd care to offer? Click
here.

BY
KURT HANSON
Satellite-delivered radio took another
step closer to reality today as XM Satellite Radio announced
its first "Charter Advertisers" and a deal for Clear Channel-owned
Premiere Radio Networks to be its advertising sales representative.
Some
time in the first half of 2001, XM Radio is scheduled to begin beaming
100 channels of digital-quality music and talk programming from
its two satellites to car, home and portable XM-Ready radios for
a monthly subscription fee of $9.95.
The "Charter Advertisers" announced by XM's
VP/Advertising Sales, former
radio group head Joe Dorton, include
agencies (including Grey, JWT, and Ogilvy), buying services (Zenith,
The Media Edge) and clients (AT&T, Discovery Networks, Looksmart.com,
and Allstate Insurance, among others).
XM
also announced today that it has signed an advertising
sales representative with Premiere
-- and that its current advertising sales staff will be folded into
Premiere's national sales force.
Yesterday, the company completed offerings which raised an additional
$228 million in capital, bringing the total it has raised up to
about $660 million of the approximately $1 billion it plans to raise
before the launch of the service. XM is the sattelite radio service
owned by General Motors, DIRECTV and Clear Channel Communications,
with studios in Washington, D.C., and programmed by Lee Abrams
and Dave Logan.
Click on the
logos above to visit various Webcasters. For some screenshots
of various audio players, click here.
For a sample full-page view (about WWW.com), click here.
Coming later this week: Lycos Radio, SpikeRadio, Groove Radio,
Salon Radio (a/k/a The Dial), and more. (Contribute your suggestions
for additional sites here.)
Thanks for
reading RAIN today. Please
check back later today for a revised edition.

If you have
friends and colleagues that you think might like to know about
this newsletter, click here
for some text you can use to send them an e-mail telling them
about us.
|
...
.
|
|