 |
Kurt Hanson is working from the Strategic Media Research
offices today. To reach him, please call 312 726-8300, or
e-mail him here.
|

BY RALPH SLEDGE
It would be wise to take a look at the up-and-coming wireless
technologies that might be used in the near future, rather than
just closing one's eyes and saying "it's coming."
A recent
article from The Motley Fool
(here),
which gives a pretty good brief rundown on wireless protocols
in
the U.S., speaks of 3G technologies,
which might be coming soon. According to the article, most people
currently use "2G" technology, also known as Digital
or Digital Cellular and the like. This gives us speeds in the
range of 14.4 - 19.2kbs range. 3G, supposedly, would give us much
faster speeds -- up to 2.4mbps.
This would
certainly be enough bandwidth for high-quality radio streams,
but it's doubtful that the speed revolution would be satisfied.
2.4mbps is faster than my current cable modem connection -- but
there's a technology out there that, if it manages to get past
some FCC
concerns, would be much faster.
The technology
is called Ultrawideband,
and it's been in use for some years already by the military, initially
for radar that could see past tree leaves and through walls. A
recent Chicago Tribune article
(here) explains
the technology in fair layman's terms, and if what they say is
to be believed, a quantum leap in wireless broadband should be
expected.
"Think
of it as Bluetooth
(the wireless computing technology maker) on steroids" says
Martin Rofheart, chief executive at XtremeSpectrum,
quoted in the Tribune article.
This company already has "a prototype [of what, it doesn't
say]
that transmits data at 50 megabits per second, and it will soon
demonstrate a model that operates at 100
megabits a second..." If this is true, then this
wireless would operate at 50-100 times
the speed of a fast cable modem!
Even if
ultrawideband doesn't meet this speed -- even if it only gets
10 megabits per second -- it would
still
be as fast, via wireless protocols, as many corporate networks.
This opens up the other possibility -- streaming
DVD-quality video over wireless connections. That makes
Ultrawideband look even more promising than what many companies
still messing with wires are offering.
Another
reason that ultrawideband is significant is that the
technology seems to already exist: indeed, most of
the articles I could find about the technology make more of a
flap about the controversy over the possible
interference the technology would cause existing radio signals,
as opposed to the feasibility of making the technology work. (CONTINUED
BELOW)
|
Have
an opinion on this article? Share it! Simply click
the headline at left to bring up a convenient pop-up form. |
(CONTINUED
FROM ABOVE)
An article in Computerworld
(here)
from May 2000 says: "...the FCC said it will only approve
widespread use of UWB if ongoing tests determine that it doesn't
interfere with other systems. The FCC is especially concerned
about the US Department of Defense's Global
Positioning System (GPS), which is used by airlines
around the world for navigation and by the military to direct
'smart' weapons."
The Tribune
article, however, indicates that many people are leaning heavily
on the FCC to figure out rules that
would allow Ultrawideband's acceptance. The FCC has already allowed
limited, experimental testing rights to a few companies, such
as Time
Domain, which is working to develop various UWB
radar technologies.
A September
CNet.com article (here)
says of Time Domain: "The Alabama-based company is still
in the early stages of the development of its technology, but
it has attracted
strong interest and investments from the likes of Sony,
Qwest Communications International,
Siemens and WorldCom."
Does this
mean that soon, we'll all skip a step and make wires unnecessary?
I don't think so: there will still be a need, at some level, for
huge amounts of data to be pumped through fat pipes quickly --
and we'll still need wires for that.
As I see
it, fast wires and fast wireless will not only coexist, but
augment each other. A recent Wired
article (here)
talks about a former cable entrepreneur who's investing millions
to build a residential fiber-optic network in several Southwestern
town.
While
this is a risky venture, I can't help but think that it makes
a lot of sense. Fiber-optics are still the fastest way to get
data from one point to another. And having a lot more of it will
only increase the aggregate bandwidth available, helping to clear
up many of the current bottlenecks that restrict the flow of data.
And fiber-optics will increase bandwidth without using up valuable
frequency, or producing huge amounts of (allegedly) brain-scrambling
radiation.
If ultrawideband
technology doesn't fall on its face in the near future for
some reason, then it seems to me more likely that this is the
technology that will bring the "wireless revolution"
out of the crawling stage. 3G's 2.4 megabits is good, but it is
just a step towards a much higher-bandwidth goal.
For all
of the promises of wireless audio and video to come true,
10mbps is a minimum. Once
the technology is adopted, then the speeds will only go up from
there -- and that's when we'll start to see the promises kept.
|
Simply click the headline at left
to bring up a convenient
pop-up form! |

From the company press release: "FullAudio
has appointed music industry veterans Michael
Fischer and Thomas Leavens
to the company's senior management team...
"As VP Content & Programming, Fischer will be responsible
for the development, creation and acquisition
of original music and editorial content for FullAudio. Fischer will
also produce genre-specific music preview channels for the service,
as well as custom subscription packages.
"Fischer served as Director of Programming at SW
Network, a joint venture between Sony
Software and Time Warner,
where he spearheaded the launch of a 24 hour satellite radio format,
created and developed online content and promotional strategies
and a nationally syndicated radio program...
"Prior to joining FullAudio, Thomas Leavens was Senior
Executive Vice President and General Counsel of Platinum
Entertainment, Inc., since the time of its start-up as
a recording studio in 1992...
"Founded in April 1999, FullAudio is located in Chicago
and New York, and is backed by leading venture capital firms and
private investors, including Kettle Partners, New Enterprise Associates,
and Venture Strategy Partners."
|
Have
an opinion on this article? Share it! Simply click
the headline at left to bring up a convenient pop-up form. |
The Washington, D.C.-based academic organization
Broadcast
Education Association has created the
Broadcast and Internet Radio Division.
The BEA hopes to attract scholars to join and contribute insights
and research for students in this field. Prof.
Michael
C. Keith has been elected chairman of the division.
Since the BEA's founding in 1955, this is the first division
devoted exclusively to radio.
New
RAIN feature:
 |
|
"The
Waiting Room"
"Every day another amazing, horrifying,
incredible, bizarre, breathtaking, strange, nauseating,
and thoroughly morbid fact." Now if that weren't convenient
enough, there's "Malady of the Month" and "Dark
and Gruesome Links." Here,
if you dare! |
 |
"City
of the Silent"
For
"lovers of cemeteries as cultural artifacts. Inside
you will find articles that tell you how to do tombstone rubbings,
chronologies, histories, calendars, glossaries, photo galleries,
stories of people buried in San Francisco's city of the dead
(Colma)..."
Here. |
Do you know of
a website that you believe
other RAIN readers would enjoy visiting? Recommend
it here.
|
 |
| November
5-7 |
NAB
European Radio Conference, Berlin
|
| November 12-14 |
Canadian Association of Broadcasters
(CAB) "Broadcasting 2000: On-air / On-line,"
Calgary |
| Nov.
28-Dec. 1 |
Radio
Ink Internet Conference, Santa Clara, CA, featuring
a brand-new national study on Internet radio usage
presented by Eric Rhoads & Kurt Hanson |
| February 1-4, 2001 |
RAB 2001. Details coming
soon. |
| xxx |
 |
|
Try
it out! Explore the wide world of
Internet audio by clicking the screenshot above.