 |
 |
TEN
SCOOPS IN TEN DAYS!
We've got a LOT of excellent, exclusive material in
the queue. Look for original reporting on brand-new stories
involving radio and the Internet virtually every day for two
straight weeks in RAIN!
|

BY KURT HANSON
In a possibly landmark event for Internet radio, AAA-formatted,
Clear Channel-owned "Channel
103.1" (KACD/KBCD/Los
Angeles) loses its FM frequency and segues to the Internet at 9AM
Los Angeles time this morning.
As noted in a front-page-of-the-feature-section story in Friday's
Chicago Tribune,
"At a time when almost every radio, TV and gas station has its
own Web site KACD's venture is noteworthy because it marks the first
time a major chain has
committed to moving one of its properties entirely from broadcast
to broadband."
Tribune staff writer Gary Dretska added, "If, by moving
its operation lock, stock and barrel to the Internet, KACD-FM 103.1
is able to stay alive in the face of rampant merger mania, the Santa
Monica-based purveyor of 'World Class Rock' will have accomplished
something no other station has done. If it fails, the worst that can
happen is that KACD's experiment will be dismissed as being slightly
ahead of its time."
The jocks are saying as I write this that there will be very
few changes in the station's programming -- although it's going to
be four jocks pulling six-hour shifts
each. (They' are saying they won't need to say the station's name
over and over, as they've been doing in the past to try to get ratings
credit.)
Visit the www.WorldClassRock.com website here,
read the Trib article here,
or read RAIN's recent coverage on the story here
and (the second news story on the page) here.
...
 |
...
Lots of pieces are in place for this transition, including
the availability of a supposedly unlimited number of streams
in a variety of formats, including WindowsMedia, RealAudio,
and Emblaze (called "Java player") -- but the station's
website is in surprisingly
poor shape.
It's a mere five-page website...and
even some of those five pages are outdated! (For
example, it says that Clear Channel is "considering"
moving the station to the Internet. And the site's one contest
is to win tickets to a House of Blues concert that happened
over a week ago) (If you only have a five-page
website, you'd think you could keep it fairly current).
Also, the station's custom audio player, provided by
a firm called SpotMagic, is called "SpotPlayer"
(pictured below).
If you were a consumer who was smart
enough to know that "spot" meant "commercial,"
would you willingly download and install a piece of software
called "SpotPlayer"?
... |
|
Have
an opinion on this story? Share it! Simply click
the headline at left to bring up a convenient pop-up form. |

BY BOB BELLIN
Streaming media has heated up as a media topic. Several articles
on it have been featured here lately
that discussed technology as it relates to what one CEO dubbed "the
user experience" and I think the subject is worth a look.
It's clear to me that streaming media, particularly audio,
is the underachieving "ne'r do well" of the Net music sector. I'm
sure that many employees of major Netcasters have already begun
typing their exceptions to that statement, but consider this before
you hit the "send" button: The latest InfoStream ratings estimate
that there are more
people living in my small subdivision than listening
worldwide, at the average moment, to the # 1 rated webcast.
Edison Research, in their most recent study on the subject,
said that only 4% (flat from the previous survey, six months prior)
of those online listened to streaming audio in the past week. Arguing
that webcasting is a real factor in web entertainment is like arguing
that UPN is a real factor in network TV.
There are a lot of reasons that consumers are just saying
"no" to web based audio and I've discussed many of them here in
the past. One that hasn't been talked about much is the proliferation
of customized "players" and endless numbers of registrations. Why
are they such a problem?
(1) Usage barrier
Does anyone really believe that the words "register now"
or "download now" do anything but send
people away? Let's examine the "user experience:" The
truth is that none of the custom players or updates on the RealPlayer
since the inception of the G2 format (roughly 2 years ago) have
done anything to enhance the "user experience" when it comes to
streaming media, as the codec is exactly the same for audio and
video as it was then. The current Windows Media's codec is newer
than Real G2, but it's been over a year since any Windows Media
update that impacted sound or video.
I can't be the only one who races for the box with the big
X when I see those words -- and the InfoStream numbers lend support
to my supposition. It's easy to blame Napster for Streaming Media's
slow adoption, but free music on demand doesn't seem to have hampered
radio listening much. Of course you don't need to download new software
and provide your e-mail address, zip code, age, income, blood type
and inseam measurements every time you tune in a new radio station,
and that may explain the disparity.
(2) Resource draining
Want to make a Pentuim lll run like a 486? Install a bunch
of media players!
We're in the process of testing all of the major players
and have found not all programs use equal amounts of system resources
in proportion to their size -- and most media players are on the
upper end of the utilization spectrum. Not only will they slow you
down while they're running, they'll slow your system down when they're
not running.
Just uninstalling the players won't help either. Many of
them make permanent registry and DLL additions that don't
go away after you remove them and those are changes that
will bog you down. One additional player and a plug in or two probably
won't be all that noticeable, but download five or more and your
system will slow considerably.
Who's looking at the banners
anyway?
Here's a question for all you "user experience"-focused media
streamers. What makes you think that anyone is looking at those
banners you've embedded in your custom players? People rarely stare
at their clock or car radios -- so they probably won't focus on
your faceplate either. I'll bet most folks are using some other
application on their PC when they access streaming media and just
minimize the player, as leaving it up doesn't enhance that "user
experience."
Streaming providers might want to take a cue from the radio
industry. They've made quite a business out of selling sixty-second
audio ads and my guess is that webcasters would do much
better marketing audio than visuals.
Larry Fine of the Three Stooges, having burned a hole in
a table with a powerful, smoke emitting substance while looking
to hatch some sort of escape, once exclaimed in a burst of vision,
"If it'll burn a hole through the table, it'll burn a hole
through the floor." Larry's sage insight applies here:
If selling audio ads works for radio, it'll probably work for webcasting.
I don't know what Moe's opinion would have been, but if asked he
probably would have included the words "...you
knuckleheads!"
|
Have
an opinion on this essay? Share it! Simply click
the headline at left to bring up a convenient pop-up form. |

From The New York Times: "To listen to the editors and
publishers of the Web site Inside.com
and the
magazine Industry Standard
talk about the new technology and entertainment magazine they announced
last week is to imagine the excitement of ancient Mesopotamians
discussing their newly invented wheel...
"The weekly magazine will be titled Inside:
The Business of Entertainment, Media and Technology.
It is supposed to make its debut by the year's end, focusing on
the impact of digital technology on the media and entertainment
industries.
"The magazine will be published in a partnership between
Standard Media International,
the parent company of the two-year-old Internet business
magazine The Industry Standard, and Powerful
Media, the parent of Inside.com, an entertainment industry
news Web site that started in June and is still trying to find its
way.
"Michael Hirschorn, the editor in chief of Inside.com,
said last week that the Internet economy and digital technology
were about to undergo the long-predicted melding and transformation
that would make the magazine necessary reading across several industries.
"Even some competing magazine editors said last week
that the concept behind Inside was a solid one. Ned Desmond, the
editor in chief of E-Company
Now, a new monthly magazine published by Time
Inc., said that the intersection of technology and entertainment
was a growth area that deserved watching.
"'There is certainly the case that there is a lot going
on, as a whole bunch of industries try to figure out digital technologies
and entertainment," he said. "And we are fascinated by the same
subject.'"
Read the entire New York
Times story here
(registration
required).

In regards to the RAIN interview (here)
with Arbitron Internet
Information Services VP/GM Bill Rose and his company's plans
for their InfoStream
webcast ratings service, one RAIN reader wrote in with the
following perspective:
 |
"Arbitron
is trying desperatly to create the need for their product..."
|
Finally, Arbitron has said it themselves (from your 8/22 issue):
"Rose commented on MeasureCast's
plans to release data with a 24-hour turnaround basis: 'That's just
fine and dandy, I think, when it comes to understanding what's going
on with your streams, but software like Lariat's Media Reports has
that ability, and it's usually available for free from your content
delivery network."
So I ask, why do we need Arbitron or MeasureCast? The
CDN's should be offering
this as verifiable data from a third party.
Arbitron is trying desperatly to create the need for their
product in a medium that already has the ability to offer the data
that Arbitron can provide. At this point, they are preying on the
ignorance of advertisers and content providers in hopes of establishing
a new marketplace.
|
We'll
send you RAIN's e-mail news updates on a regular basis,
plus bulletins when important news breaks. (In addition, we'll
appreciate knowing that you're reading our efforts.)
You should be receiving
a confirmation e-mail from us shortly.
Thanks!
|
 |
| September
12-14 |
Digital
Coast 2000, Los Angeles, featuring a panel on Internet
radio moderated by RAIN's Kurt Hanson |
| September
20-22 |
Gavin.com:
Music on the Net, San Francisco |
| September
20-23 |
NAB
Radio Show, San Francisco |
| Sept.
29-Oct. 1 |
MOBE/Internet
& Technology, Chicago |
| October
5-7 |
Billboard/Airplay
Monitor Seminar, New York |
| October
9-12 |
QuickTime
Live! Conference,
Beverly Hills |
| November
5-7 |
NAB
European Radio Conference, Berlin
|
| Nov.
28-Dec. 1 |
Radio
Ink Internet Conference, Santa Clara, CA |
| xxx |
 |
|
Try it
out! Explore
the wide world of Internet audio by clicking the screenshot above.
Miss an issue?
Visit the RAIN News Archives here.
|
|