From the website of Adult Album Alternative-formattedChannel 103.1 (KACD)/Los
Angeles: "The era of corporate mergers may be good for some,
but for Channel 103.1, it means the end of our radio station."
(Clear Channel is selling the station shortly, at which time it will
be flipped to a Spanish-language format.)
"That is unless you can help. Our parent company, Clear
Channel Communications, has promised us that if we can show them that
enough listeners will follow us, they will make Channel 103.1 the
first-ever radio station to move
from the FM dial to a state-of-the-art broadband broadcast over the
Internet.
"This will make Channel1031.com a very high quality audio
service that you can listen to regardless of where you are, anywhere
in the world, and will insure that Channel 103.1 will live on.
"How can you help? Take a moment to fill out a simple registration
form so that we can show our parent company that people want Channel1031.com.
So, register below and please spread the word to all your friends..."
I'm not sure if this is a sincere request on the part of the staff
or a clever marketing ploy, but whichever one it is, that's cool.
One interesting point, though, is that the Channel 103.1 website is
about as garish as they get -- almost a dozen flashing banner ad-like
boxers on the home page, irrationally mixed typefaces, etc.
For fun, visit the site, pretend you're a potential advertiser,
and try to click on either of two buttons in the bottom-right corner
of the home page -- "Target Your Market -- Advertise! (Click
here)" or "Why advertise? Why with us? Why not click to
find out?" You'll be taken to a Clear Channel Communications
corporate website that doesn't address the question, as near as I
can tell, at all. Try following any kind of logical path, and
I believe you'll end up back at the Channel 103.1 home page again.
Internet-only webcaster Comedy
World, a newly-launched entertainment network (see 6/6/00
RAIN story here),
announced last week that it has received
$10M in first-round funding from venture capital firm Attractor,
and private investors including Daniel Rosensweig (President and CEO,
ZDNet), Shelby Bonnie, and Charles Moldow (Senior Vice President,
Tellme).
The site also announced a Board of Advisors that includes Edward
Bennett, former CEO of VH1, George Schlatter, creator of
"Rowan & Martin's Laugh-In," Andy Schuon, CEO
of FarmClub.com and former MTV programmer, and Frank Wood,
CEO, Secret Communication.
"Comedy World is an independent 24-hour entertainment network
created to produce and broadcast original comedy programming. The
network will mix live audio, streaming video, animation, interactive
features and games that can be accessed via local radio stations"
-- I have no idea what they mean by that -- and the Internet.
Programming includes original content from nationally known comedians."
The
VC firm, Attractor, claims to currently manage more than $750M
in funds, investing in the Internet, software and telecommunication
sectors, yet somehow can apparently only afford a clumsy-looking signle-page
website.
We'll
send you RAIN's e-mail news updates on a regular basis,
plus bulletins when important news breaks. (In addition, we'll
appreciate knowing that you're reading our efforts -- and
you'll hopefully appreciate reminders to read RAIN.)
You should be receiving
a confirmation e-mail from us shortly.
Thanks!
Reprinted
from Monday's late afternoon edition: We're now
into our third day of discussion about ClevelandHits.com
(see original story here).
Numerous readers have contributed, including PD Dave Eubanks...
"We
are simply taking our place alongside radio as a New Media..."
In
response to the RAIN reader who wrote,"Local radio stations
can easily combat this approach..." I would like to submit
that Hits Network (Clevelandhits.com) are designed to simply offer
the at-home entertainment consumers another choice. We are taking
our place alongside radio as a "New Media".
Clevelandhits.com and Hits Network are not format focuesd. We are
offering an oppertunity to have your voice heard and participate
in the actual programing of the site. In offering a true choice
to the consumers they can interact, and have instant results. After
all isn't that what the Internet was actually designed to do?
All Hits Network sites will be locally operated and designed for
its's respective city. We will also be focusing on the Local music
scene. Offering an outlet to the local groups that can't get any
exposure on the air, even though they sell out the local venues.
There is SO much music out there that deserves to be heard, no one
format/station can handle the load. We are another choice. New Media
for the new millenium.
This comment is in response to the ClevelandHits.com reader
who asked, "Why go to __ hits.com to hear CHR when you can already
get it on your favorite local CHR station?"
This RAIN reader needs to count the commercials, consider the
clutter, and count his/her blessings. When the Internet gives this
one station parity with 6,000-10,000 streaming competitors, what will
happen to cume and TSL? Will the transmitter be obsolete in 5 years?
How about these comments from the past about futuristic happenings:
Who would listen to Cable when they watch the three network TV channels?
Who would buy a foreign (Japanese) car when they could buy one made
in America. Who would listen to a syndicated morning show from another
city when they could hear a local DJ?
John
Lund
The Lund Consultants to Broadcast Mgmt.
San Francisco
"Why
would anyone think that'd be a good thing?..."
Well, I'd say
they have a long way to go. The site design is -- ahem --
a bit hard on the eyes. During
the 12PM hour today, they had a grand total of 13 responses to their
online request feature (& each listener can select up to 7 songs...).
Plus, they make the curious choice to give people who choose the
"56k" option better video (of a DJ at a control board) and worse
audio than those who choose "28.8". Wait a minute, folks -- this
is radio, right?
These are all fixable. But what about the concept itself? There
are good reasons why you don't find any broadcast stations playing
Offspring, Lipps Inc., and Enrique Iglesias in the same half-hour
(as they did during the time I listened). The whole concept is a
step backward to the "if it's a hit we'll play it" era of 60s Top
40. Why would anyone think that that'd be a good thing?
The reason that those stations worked is that they were generally
the only place you could hear any hit music. You sat through
Henry Mancini to hear the new Stones single (or vice-versa) because
that's the only place you could hear it. Why would a contemporary
listener suffer through Madonna & N'Sync to hear Stone Temple Pilots
when they could more easily (by turning on the radio) sit through
Nirvana & Limp Bizkit instead? Or, by tuning into another Internet
channel, find something that honed in on their personal tastes even
more exactly?
Ad insertion
Automation systems
Conferences
Content providers
Custom music channels
E-commerce partners
E-mail management
Internet radio hardware
NTR revenue opportunities
Other services
Ratings
Research (web-based)
Spot sales
Streaming audio formats
Streaming providers
Website design
If you are a vendor
and would like to knowmore
about sponsoring a button and link in this guide, please call RAIN
at 773-975-9454 or send an e-mailHERE.
Avail
Avail
Avail
Avail
Avail
Avail
Avail
Avail
Avail
Avail
Avail
Avail
Avail
Avail
Avail
Avail
Avail
Avail
Avail
Avail
Avail
Avail
Avail
Avail
Avail
Avail
Avail
Avail
Avail
Avail
Avail
Avail
Avail
Avail
Avail
Avail
Avai
Avai
Avail
Avail
Avail
Avail
Avail
Avail
Avail
Avail
Avail
Avail
Avail
Avai
Avail
Avail
Avail
Avail
Avail
Avail
Avail
Avail
Kurt.
don't forget that you used a one-pixel GIF after the "Research"
line for spacing purposes!
Copyright
2000, Coherent Design, Inc. All
rights reserved.
Note:
All logos and trademarks are, of course, property of their respective owners.