 |

Last week in RAIN, we featured an exclusive interview
with Everstream founders Stephen McHale and Lee Zapis (click
screenshot at right to read story) and noted that Warner
Music -- and now also BMG -- sealed an agreement with MP3.com
to permit use of their product in the My.MP3.com service. (Click
here
for InternetNews.com's story on the subject.)
Some RAIN reader feedback on these two stories follows:
 |
"If
I were a music radio station in St. Louis I'd be pretty indignant..."
|
The
St. Louis Post-Dispatch -- which has, over the years, partnered
with a number of local stations on promotions and events -- has begun
use of Everstream's facilities on their website.
Lotsa different formats, alright, and all come in cleanly (albeit
in mono), even on my s-l-o-w speed home connection. The
production of the music formats is fade-way-out, no modulation for
a few seconds, then start the next song. Kinda like listening to CD's.
But I think if I were a music radio station in St. Louis I'd be pretty
indignant about the paper's use of the service.
Just about everybody here streams online (except CBS/Infinity, of
course) and most promote it on-air and on-line. There are even some
sub-channels. With the exception of the news, sports and talk stations,
the newspaper has just become another "competitor."
I'd be very wary about partnering with Pulitzer if I were a radio
station these days...
-- Mike Anderson, GM, The Pickering
Companies (STL and The World)
 |
"Newspapers...are
supposed to sit back and let us keep our turf...?"
|
So, Kurt, let
me get this right. You have readers who are upset that the St.
Louis Post-Dispatch is competing with radio? Or all those other newspapers
too? Huh?
So newspapers (and whom else) are supposed to sit back and let us
keep our turf (our audience) during this revolution?
Again, I don't think we've even scratched the dust on the surface.
Have you seen Budweiser.com? They've got BudRadio right up there.
Wait till you see P&GRadio and PepsiRadio and Wal-Mart Radio -- all
with content (including music) aimed at their P-1 audiences. Just
a matter of time.
Bottom line - we gotta compete better if we want to keep the turf.
--
Jim Taszarek, Taz@tazmedia.com
 |
"This
[MP3] issue is much more complex than it appears..."
|
This issue is much more complex that it appears. Some quick
points:
1) It's unfair to say that mp3.com "broke the law" by doing
what they did. We considered the same concept in drafting our original
business plan, after consulting with several attorneys as to whether
the courts would find it legal. Every opinion was that is was a
grey area...meaning that mp3.com (who presumably did their
own due dilligence before launching) was in uncharted waters with
this feature, not flagrantly violating established law.
2) Just my opinion, but the judge did everyone a disservice
by issuing summary judgement without hearing expert testimony.
It's unlikely that he understood the issue of what a digital copy
is as fully as he would have if he heard experts form both sides
testify.
3) The issue in this case was never piracy. "Storage"
with this system required a user to put CD in their PC before mp3.com
would accept it. You couldn't download something from Napster
and then shoot it up to the mymp3.com feature. True, you could give
your password to someone else, potentially abetting piracy, but
adding a cookie to the password could have prevented password sharing
(not a big factor in the real world anyway) but I'll bet the judge
who issued the ruling has no idea what a password/cookie system
is. That's one area the expert testimony might have been useful.
4) The amount of money that mp3.com is paying (reported to
be over $100 million) to license this will never be recouped.
You can buy a 27gig hard drive that will hold about 75,000 songs
for $100 and that number will probably be $50 in a year. There isn't
much long term value to mymp3.com or myplay for that matter.
5) This issue was/is more complicated than the judge
who ruled on it seemed to grasp and who knows, a more detailed and
exhaustive hearing might have netted the same result. But...while
it's unreasonable to expect judges to be net savvy and up to date
on the nature of all things digital, I think it should be SOP for
them to hear both sides completely in open court when new legal
issues with a technological backdrop are being bundled into case
law.
--
Bob Bellin, MP3Player.com
|
We'll
send you RAIN's e-mail news updates on a regular basis,
plus bulletins when important news breaks. (In addition, we'll
appreciate knowing that you're reading our efforts -- and
you'll hopefully appreciate reminders to read RAIN.)
You should be receiving
a confirmation e-mail from us shortly.
Thanks!
|
Reprinted
from Friday's late afternoon edition:

BY
KURT HANSON
GlobalMedia.com,
the Vancouver-based
provider of streaming and e-commerce services for radio stations,
has agreed to buy 212 assignable radio
station contracts from OnRadio.com
in a transaction with an announced value of $9 million.
However, the press release on the deal (here)
reveals that all but $500,000 of the purchase price for the contracts
will be in GlobalMedia stock. Although it's not mentioned in the
press release, investors' news service On24
reported that OnRadio may receive as much as an additional $3 million
cash if GlobalMedia can sign OnRadio's remaining radio station sales
prospects.
GlobalMedia previously had contracts with
48 radio stations in the U.S. and Canada.
GlobalMedia
President Jeff Mandelbaum told an interview for On24,
"Purchasing the contracts gives us a cume of in excess of 50
million listeners at a very attractive price." (This might
be the combined broadcast cumes of the 212 stations involved, but
this couldn't possibly be the cume of the webcasts that they're
acquiring.)
"Conservative projections increase our revenues in excess
of 30% over the next three years," Mandelbaum told the On24
interviewer. (According to Hoover's Online, in its 1999 fiscal year,
which ended in July, the company had 70 employees and revenues of
$.1 million.)
OnRadio gets $42K per contract
As for OnRadio, they're apparently going to get $42,000 in
cash and stock for each of their radio station contracts
as they transition themselves into a B2B play.
Their site currently contains links to two private-labeled multi-channel
radio stations that they've set up for Spin magazine (pictured
at left) and First USA bank. (Note: The First USA station
gives site visitors their choice of five music channels.)

Contribute your comments about your experiences with GlobalMedia
or OnRadio, or your thoughts about this deal, here.
 |
| June
12-14 |
Streaming
Media East 2000, New York City |
| June
14-17 |
R&R
Convention 2000, Los Angeles |
| June
14-17 |
PROMAX
& BDA, New Orleans |
| July
13-16 |
Upper
Midwest Conclave, Minneapolis |
| August
3-5 |
Morning
Show Bootcamp, New Orleans |
| September
20-23 |
NAB
Radio Show, San Francisco |
| October
5-7 |
Billboard/Airplay
Monitor Seminar, New York |
| November
5-7 |
NAB
European Radio Conference, Berlin
|
| Nov.
28-Dec. 1 |
Radio
Ink Internet Conference, Santa Clara, CA |
| xxx |
 |
|
Try it
out! Explore
the wide world of Internet audio by clicking the screenshot above.
Miss an issue?
Visit the RAIN News Archives here.
|
|