 |

BY
KURT HANSON
GlobalMedia.com,
the Vancouver-based
provider of streaming and e-commerce services for radio stations,
has agreed to buy 212 assignable radio
station contracts from OnRadio.com
in a transaction with an announced value of $9 million.
However, the press release on the deal (here)
reveals that all but $500,000 of the purchase price for the contracts
will be in GlobalMedia stock. Although it's not mentioned in the press
release, investors' news service On24
reported that OnRadio may receive as much as an additional $3 million
cash if GlobalMedia can sign OnRadio's remaining radio station sales
prospects.
GlobalMedia previously had contracts with
48 radio stations in the U.S. and Canada.
GlobalMedia
President Jeff Mandelbaum told an interview for On24,
"Purchasing the contracts gives us a cume of in excess of 50
million listeners at a very attractive price." (This might
be the combined broadcast cumes of the 212 stations involved, but
this couldn't possibly be the cume of the webcasts that they're
acquiring.)
"Conservative projections increase our revenues in excess
of 30% over the next three years," Mandelbaum told the On24 interviewer.
(According to Hoover's Online, in its 1999 fiscal year, which ended
in July, the company had 70 employees and revenues of $.1 million.)
OnRadio gets $42K per contract
As for OnRadio, they're apparently going to get $42,000 in
cash and stock for each of their radio station contracts
as they transition themselves into a B2B play.
Their site currently contains links to two private-labeled multi-channel
radio stations that they've set up for Spin magazine (pictured
at left) and First USA bank. (Note: The First USA station gives
site visitors their choice of five music channels.)

Contribute your comments about your experiences with GlobalMedia
or OnRadio, or your thoughts about this deal, here.

Warner
Music settles with MP3.com
The
agreement will allow MP3.com
to include the labels' songs in its Internet-based database.
Read the morning's news piece from The Industry Standard here.
("According
to published reports, MP3.com is expected to pay Warner Music...between
$15 and $20 million to settle the suit..." Read background
piece in E-Commerce Times here.)
Feed The Monster hires financial
PR firm
Radio website developer/manager Feed
The Monster has engaged Continental Capital & Equity Corp.
to launch a market awareness campaign targeting individual investors,
analysts, institutions and other financial professionals. FTM
is awaiting approval on its NASDAQ Small Cap listing application.
Read more from R&R Online here.
(Visit a sample FTM website -- FM talk KLSX/Los Angeles's --
here.)
McGrath
takes charge of MTVi
MTV
Networks President
Judy McGrath was given the additional role of chairwoman of
interactive music at MTV Interactive yesterday.
MTVi President and CEO Nicholas Butterworth will now answer to McGrath.
The MTVi group consists of MTV.com,
VH1.com and Sonicnet.com.
More details
here.
|
We'll
send you RAIN's e-mail news updates on a regular basis,
plus bulletins when important news breaks. (In addition, we'll
appreciate knowing that you're reading our efforts -- and
you'll hopefully appreciate reminders to read RAIN.)
You should be receiving
a confirmation e-mail from us shortly.
Thanks!
|
Industry Standard looks at
"Faces made for Web radio"
"Web radio was supposed
to be DJ-free, but a new generation of shows is challenging this.
Can Imus.com be far behind?"
Read the full article on personality-based Internet radio --
featuring Enigma Digital's GrooveRadio.com
and KNAC.com, Bob Meyrowitz's
eYada.com, and Laurence
Norjean's KIISfmi.com
-- from
this week's issue of The Industry Standard here.
Frequent RAIN guest columnist Bob Bellin
has some thoughts on the MP3.com decision...
 |
"This
[MP3] issue is much more complex than it appears..."
|
This issue is much more complex that it appears. Some quick
points:
1) It's unfair to say that mp3.com "broke the law" by doing
what they did. We considered the same concept in drafting our original
business plan, after consulting with several attorneys as to whether
the courts would find it legal. Every opinion was that is was a
grey area...meaning that mp3.com (who presumably did their
own due dilligence before launching) was in uncharted waters with
this feature, not flagrantly violating established law.
2) Just my opinion, but the judge did everyone a disservice
by issuing summary judgement without hearing expert testimony.
It's unlikely that he understood the issue of what a digital copy
is as fully as he would have if he heard experts form both sides
testify.
3) The issue in this case was never piracy. "Storage"
with this system required a user to put CD in their PC before mp3.com
would accept it. You couldn't download something from Napster
and then shoot it up to the mymp3.com feature. True, you could give
your password to someone else, potentially abetting piracy, but
adding a cookie to the password could have prevented password sharing
(not a big factor in the real world anyway) but I'll bet the judge
who issued the ruling has no idea what a password/cookie system
is. That's one area the expert testimony might have been useful.
4) The amount of money that mp3.com is paying (reported to
be over $100 million) to license this will never be recouped.
You can buy a 27gig hard drive that will hold about 75,000 songs
for $100 and that number will probably be $50 in a year. There isn't
much long term value to mymp3.com or myplay for that matter.
5) This issue was/is more complicated than the judge
who ruled on it seemed to grasp and who knows, a more detailed and
exhaustive hearing might have netted the same result. But...while
it's unreasonable to expect judges to be net savvy and up to date
on the nature of all things digital, I think it should be SOP for
them to hear both sides completely in open court when new legal
issues with a technological backdrop are being bundled into case
law.
--
Bob Bellin, MP3Player.com
Final version of yesterday's
lead story now available

BY
KURT HANSON
There's a very real possibility that your market could soon
have its own multichannel Internet-only radio
station, with localized news and information content (including
spots from local advertisers) -- and rather than being owned by
one of the current radio operators, it may belong to your local
newspaper.
That's part of the business model behind a new, Cleveland-based
media company called Everstream,
founded one year ago by
entrepreneur Stephen McHale, who was joined by veteran Cleveland
radio executive Lee Zapis last fall...
Yesterday's article was posted in chapters,
with the final version posted at 6PM. To read the feature
in its entirety, click here.

What do you think? Can each newspaper build a radio operation
with an audience the size of a mid-level broadcast station, as they
hope to do? Is radio missing an opportunity here? Do you have any
questions I haven't addressed? Contribute your feedback using
your own e-mail software here
or via a form here.
 |
| June
12-14 |
Streaming
Media East 2000, New York City |
| June
14-17 |
R&R
Convention 2000, Los Angeles |
| June
14-17 |
PROMAX
& BDA, New Orleans |
| July
13-16 |
Upper
Midwest Conclave, Minneapolis |
| August
3-5 |
Morning
Show Bootcamp, New Orleans |
| September
20-23 |
NAB
Radio Show, San Francisco |
| October
5-7 |
Billboard/Airplay
Monitor Seminar, New York |
| November
5-7 |
NAB
European Radio Conference, Berlin
|
| Nov.
28-Dec. 1 |
Radio
Ink Internet Conference, Santa Clara, CA |
| xxx |
 |
|
Try it
out! Explore
the wide world of Internet audio by clicking the screenshot above.
Miss an issue?
Visit the RAIN News Archives here.
|
|