
Welcome!
Today's News
Search
Message
boards
Feedback form
Guest essay
Copyright
Law
DMCA
(.pdf file)

Letter
to Mel
LMIV consortium
Overview
5/ 15
Stern stopsets
Site
of the Week

News
archives
Internet 101
Internet 201
Definitions
Who's Who
Interesting
sites

Overview
Arbitron
MeasureCast
Weekly
Monthly

Edison/Arbitron
Listenership
Content
Study
Side
Channels

Coherent
Design
Contact
us
Readers' forum
Kurt's essay
Fave bookmarks
Vendor
guide
Chat room
|
 |
 |
|
 |

From Industry Standard's "Beat Sheet": Last Thursday
was a busy day for the Recording Industry Association
of America, which filed suits against file-sharing startup Aimster
and music portal Launch Media
in a one-two punch. Aimster is being charged with copyright infringement,
while Launch's suit deals with failure to seek proper
licensing for its personalized LaunchCast radio service...
"Launch pulled LaunchCast from its site for a time,
saying that it was in negotiations to resolve the dispute. At
press time, a number of 'pre-programmed Internet radio stations'
appeared to be back up on the site - a change from last week's
scenario, in which the 'Internet Radio' portion of Launch.com
yielded a header that read
'LaunchCast is temporarily unavailable' - but the only interactive
feature offered to listeners was a pause button.
Perhaps this is due to the RIAA's
argument that Launch's licensing agreements don't
allow the interactivity and customization that the service provides
(or provided). There seems to be a good basis for negotiation
going forward: Webnoize
points out that the Warner Music Group has a licensing deal with
Launch that allows for certain interactivity, and that WMG didn't
participate in the suit."
(The current issue of "Beat Sheet" is not yet available
on the web.)
From BusinessWire: "Launch
Media Inc. today announced that it has completed a $2
million short-term secured debt financing from a major media company.
This financing replaces the secured convertible note financing
that the company had previously announced pursuant to a non-binding
letter of intent."
Read the release here.
...
 |
...
This lawsuit highlights one of the most critical
issues facing Internet radio: How much "interactivity" is
too much? According to the DMCA,
webcasts only qualify for the statutory RIAA license if
‘‘the transmission is not part of an interactive service..."
("Interactive" webcasters have to negotiate separate rights
agreements with every single record label.)
However, when the DMCA refers to "interactive" stations,
it seems as if it might be referring to "on-demand" services
in which listeners can pick specific songs they want to
hear next.
The RIAA is taking a far more aggressive position
-- namely, that almost any consumer ability to influence
the stream makes the service interactive. (Example of this
might be a "skip" button or the ability to adjust the proportion
of different genres of music the listener hears.)
In the U.S. legal system, unclear definitions like
this are typically defined more clearly as a result of lawsuits
being resolved in court. Thus, this RIAA vs. Launch lawsuit
(or an earlier RIAA vs. Sonicnet lawsuit) may be a landmark
ruling that determines for everyone the level of interactivity
that is "too much." -- KH
.. |
BY PAUL MALONEY
Just this morning, we received an e-mail informing us of the
newly redesigned Radio
Sonicnet. The
actual changes made seem to be pretty minimal (mostly along the
lines of music news and info, and "recommendation" features).
However, Radio Sonicnet still features "My Station,"
a function which allows listeners to add or remove individual
artists and genres from their customized stream.
It's actually not as flexible as it sounds. Users
are only shown a partial list of artists that play on their station
(according to the site, the entire list of artists isn't shown
because "It's against the law. Federal copyright regulations
prevent any Internet broadcaster from displaying a complete list
of artists they play...").
One
can only remove artists one at a time (out station has nearly
a thousand artists), it takes three clicks to complete the process,
and the changes don't take effect until the player is reloaded.
Nonetheless, it seemed interesting to receive notice of
Radio Sonicnet's "interactivity" in light of the RIAA's
suit against Launch.
...
 |
...
According to the DMCA, what's required is that ‘‘the
transmitting entity does not cause to be published, or induce
or facilitate the publication, by means of an advance program
schedule or prior announcement...other than for illustrative
purposes, the names of the featured recording artists, except
that this clause does not disqualify a transmitting entity
that makes a prior announcement that a particular artist
will be featured within an unspecified future time period..."
Presumably, this is to prevent listeners from knowing
when specific music will be played (which would enable them
to more easily take advantage of opportunities to record
their favorites).
But Sonicnet is interpreting this law to mean that
they are not allowed to show more than 20 artists at a time
of a particular stream? Wouldn't showing an entire list,
since it's not an "advance schedule," be more
for "illustrative purposes?" We don't see how
displaying a complete artist list would aid in piracy. But
it certainly does make it more difficult to remove new and
unfamiliar artists -- which would decrease the labels' marketing
leverage on these streams.
.. |
From the press release: " EarthLink,
the nation's second largest Internet service provider (ISP) as
ranked by 
paid subscribers, and RadioCentral,
a pioneering provider of custom interactive radio programming
for commerce and content Web sites, have launched EarthLink Radio...
"'EarthLink is among the first Web sites in the world to
have its own live, truly interactive
radio stations,' said Eric Rhoads, president and chief executive
officer of RadioCentral. 'RadioCentral blends the proven efficacy
of terrestrial radio with the accessibility of the Internet to
create high-quality, leading-edge radio stations that listeners
can't always get locally.'"
The release goes on to define "interactivity"
as "...Listeners are able to click on buttons of the live
'audio player' when prompted by voice or music cues. Each click
produces a screen view of additional information, video content,
or the ability to make an instant purchase. Interactivity enables
listeners to act -- rather than just listen passively -- immediately
after hearing audio prompts for advertised products and services."
Read the piece here.
...
 |
...
Ah, yet another interesting definition of "interactivity."
Of course, a "live" stream can't be interactive
in "industry-accepted" sense -- that is, allowing
the user control of the artists, songs, and/or genres heard
on the stream. Clickable buttons to view artist information,
video content, or make purchases is really nothing revolutionary.
The player and the streams are really nice though
(and you don't need to be an Earthlink subscriber to enjoy
the radio). Look for a follow-up report in RAIN soon.
.. |
From RadioInk.com: " McVay
Media has entered into an agreement with Internet programmer
and consultant, 
Daniel Anstandig, to represent his services in consultation to
Internet radio stations around the world.
"Anstandig is best known as the teen prodigy who built
an Adult Contemporary Internet radio station from ground up at
the age of 14...called DAER. DAER
will continue to operate under Anstandig’s direction...
"Anstandig, 18 years young, will be based at McVay’s
Cleveland operation."
Read this piece here.
Radio DAER claims 1.2 million unique listeners and 16 million
user sessions each month. Anstandig is pictured above.
|
Have
an opinion on this article? Share it! Simply
click the headline at left to bring up a convenient "Submit"
form. |
|
|
|
.
|
.
|
|
|