| Over the past few days, we have been reconfiguring
the RAIN mail system. Unfortunately, we understand
that this has caused some mail sent to us to "bounce,"
and some mail has simply disappeared. The servers are back
up and running, and you may contact us or send feedback
to "feedback@kurthanson.com" (or simply click
here).
Please note that the "Send a message" boxes on
the page are still not functioning. |

From CNet News.com: "
RealNetworks
CEO Rob Glaser gave a first public look Thursday at the
MusicNet
subscription service his company is building, describing features
that resemble Napster's file-swapping service.
"MusicNet, a joint venture with major record labels
from AOL Time Warner, Bertelsmann and EMI Group, plans to let
music fans search for, then download or stream, a broad range
of music owned by those three labels, Glaser (pictured, with artist
Lyle Lovett) said...
"Like Napster, however, these giants told members
of Congress on Thursday that they are running into legal licensing
roadblocks, highlighting just how far the mainstream music industry
has fractured as it moves further onto the Net. MusicNet and Duet
face opposition from songwriters and music publishers, which stood
side-by-side with the record labels in the fight against Napster
but are now sitting across the negotiating table as the labels
try to launch subscription services...
"The labels are asking Congress to grant a 'safe harbor'
that protects them from further lawsuits while they

launch the subscription services, saying they would pay retroactive
fees to publishers after the Copyright Office clarifies the law.
"'Music publishing issues stand out as the most significant
impediment' to online distribution, Glaser said. 'If we're not
able to quickly resolve these issues, it will be necessary for
Congress and the (United States) Copyright Office to step in.'
"Instead of the old anarchic grassroots file-swapping,
MusicNet is putting peer-to-peer to a new use that looks more
like the Net-speeding capabilities of Akamai Technologies and
its rivals. If a song that one member wants can be downloaded
more quickly from another member instead of from the central servers,
the system can go to this other member instead."
Read the entire article
here.
|
Have
an opinion on this article? Share it! Simply
click the headline at left to bring up a convenient "Submit"
form. |

BY PAUL MALONEY
These are indeed dark days for streaming, so it's always a
treat to find a traditional broadcaster doing their thing on the
web. MyStar Communications' Adult Contemporary
WTPI-FM/Indianapolis
is indeed

a broadcast outlet still available on the Internet.
Formatically, WTPI is probably a lot like the "soft
rock" station in your town. We heard Carole King, Stevie
Nicks, John Mellencamp, Phil Collins, and the like. Basically,
after a song that might have appeal to 25-54 year-old females
has successfully run its course at a format like CHR, Rock, or
Country (that is, it's "researched" well with test groups
and sold well at retail, yet isn't new anymore), it lands at this
type of format. Not for the musically adventurous to be sure,
but probably the most lucrative music radio format (these stations
generally compile significant "time spent listening"
by a demo quite appealing to advertisers).
The site itself was easy enough to navigate and explore.
The station and the site showcase all the on-air personalities,
not just the morning show (and that's quite a job --

there are some many DJs at this station, the station might drive
cume by hiring half of their target audience!).
There are a couple schools of thought on this. Our theory
is that if your station's personality is worth showcasing (and
pity the radio professional whose personality isn't!), then do
it. It adds to your brand and offers entertainment value to listeners
that your competitors can't. This is especially important for
this kind of format, the listeners of which most likely use the
radio differently than say, a hardcore jazz fan listens to a particular
channel.
WTPI does bring personality (and useful information) in
their original editorial material -- the CD and movie reviews.
Here's an opportunity to expand the station's value to the listener,
and give them the "human element." Even if a certain
listener thinks the weekend jock who panned the listener's favorite
artist's new CD is a blowhard know-nothing -- the station has
made a memorable, "human" impression. This will always
benefit the station.
But make the most of your personalities. We're talking
about the "Air Staff" profiles here. The problem here
isn't that the WTPI personalities are spotlighted, or that they
aren't interesting people. But why not present them in a way that
makes them compelling and interesting?
Why not challenge the personalities -- and make them contribute
some of their creativity? Listeners think radio personalities
are larger then life, so why disappoint them? How about this:
have each personality write one paragraph about something that
a
listener would be interested to read.
The jock's favorite moment with a music celebrity, their most
embarrassing/heartbreaking/thrilling moment in their broadcast
career, the worst "dues" they had to pay in their career,
or why a certain cause or charity is most important to them --
all

could
be compelling "stories." Tell the story! Things like
this would serve to attach a human element to the station and
brand -- again, things that no competitor can do exactly the same
way.
Finally, it was quite nice to see a broadcaster making use
of an Internet "side channel." WTPI offers a Smooth
Jazz Internet-only stream called "Nightbreeze." The
theory here, apparently, is to once again "expand the brand."
It's a way to offer something to the station's listeners whose
tastes are closer to the fringe of WTPI's musical offerings, and
hopefully prevent them from looking elsewhere. The role that the
"tucked away on a weekend morning" specialty show has
played for broadcast radio (WTPI does indeed have a Sunday morning
jazz show) can now be filled by an Internet-only channel without
interrupting normal programming.