
Welcome!
Today's News
Search
Message
boards
Feedback form
Guest essay
Copyright
Law
DMCA
(.pdf file)

Letter
to Mel
LMIV consortium
Overview
5/ 15
Stern stopsets
Site
of the Week

News
archives
Internet 101
Internet 201
Definitions
Who's Who
Interesting
sites

Overview
Arbitron
MeasureCast
Weekly
Monthly

Edison/Arbitron
Listenership
Content
Study
Side
Channels

Coherent
Design
Contact
us
Readers' forum
Kurt's essay
Fave bookmarks
Vendor
guide
Chat room
|
 |
 |
|
 |

Radio and Records is reporting that 3Com has announced
that they'll finally be shipping their Kerbango
Internet
radio appliance in two weeks.
The Kerbango unit will connect directly to the user's broadband
connection and tune in thousands of Internet radio stations --
without the use of a PC. The unit includes speakers, but can be
wired into a home stereo system. The Kerbango includes and AM/FM
tuner.
The company had originally planned to get the unit to consumers
as much as a year ago, but now say the "rigors of design
and testing" have delayed the launch. The device is going
through the final test stage now.
Consumers can pre-order the unit at Amazon.com.
Look for it to sell for around $300.
See RAIN's coverage of the product's unveiling last February
here
and here.
Here is RAIN's review of the product and the web-based
channel guide.

BY PAUL MALONEY
Music download retailer EMusic
has filed an official complaint against Napster for "contributory
and
vicarious copyright infringement and unfair competition."
The filing comes less than a day after US District Court Judge
Marilyn Patel handed down her rewritten injunction against the
embattled file-sharing network (see RAIN coverage here,
and the ruling itself here).
This past weekend, apparently as a good faith move in anticipation
of Patel's revision, Napster announced that
they were installing software that would block the trade of selected
copyrighted files on its system. However, EMusic CEO Gene Hoffman
(left) contends that Napster has, until now, been insisting that
such a move wasn't technically feasible. It was Napster's "180"
that apparently spurred the filing.
"For over six months, Napster Inc. has flatly rejected
our requests to filter out and effectively block EMusic tracks
from being traded on their system without our permission," says
Hoffman. "In light of this position, Napster's ability to quickly
implement such a filtering system over this past weekend shows
the company's true motive -- to unfairly build a business upon
the copyrighted works of others."
It's proving just this -- that Napster has engaged in "willful
infringement" -- that could prove to be a potential financial
windfall for copyright owners looking to collect damages. According
to CNet News (here),
should plaintiffs be able to prove such a motive on Napster's
part, they stand to collect as much as $150,000 per song traded.
Last November, EMusic announced that they were unveiling
software that could identify
and block song files being shared by Napster users (see RAIN
coverage here).
EMusic began notifying Napster of users that were distributing
EMusic tracks without permission. Napster then barred these users
from the system. Yesterday EMusic, as goodwill gesture towards
these file traders, asked Napster to reinstate them.
EMusic, like most companies in the downloadable music retail
space, has suffered as millions log on to Napster every day to
get popular music for free. Though it has enjoyed recent small
spikes in price as more signs begin pointing to Napster's doom,
EMusic's stock has fallen from nearly eight dollars less than
a year ago to the neighborhood of about 25 cents. The company
laid off on-third of its staff last January, following the cut
of 20 percent of its employees the previous June.
Producers of the Grammy awards have also announced that
they are filing suit against Napster. They allege recordings of
exclusive musical performances have been traded on the file-sharing
network.
|
Have
an opinion on this article? Share it! Simply click
the headline at left to bring up a convenient "Submit"
form. |
Reprinted from yesterday's edition...

From Digital Coast Daily: "It was the ruling that many
once feared would spell D-Day for Napster,
but when U.S.
District Court Judge Marilyn Hall Patel issued her injunction today,
it left Napster with plenty of 'wiggle room,' in the words of digital
music analyst Nitsan Hargil at Kaufman Brothers...
"Napster will now
have to stop enabling its users from swapping copyrighted songs
as the potentially lengthy court case proceeds. Once the copyright
owners inform Napster about infringements, the file-sharing company
will have three business days to prevent the trading of the files
in question...
"At the Friday hearing to discuss the injunction, Napster
announced that it would voluntarily block certain songs from being
swapped, and over the weekend it had already started blocking some
songs by anti-Napster acts including Metallica and Dr. Dre.
"But users quickly found ways to circumvent the blocks,
such as Aimster's plan to convert file names into Pig Latin (here),
a 'plus one' alphabetical system (see below) or the MP3 Translator
solution posted at timwilson.org.
Now, the labels and Napster will be working together to keep track
of such schemes. Broussard said that will be a major headache for
both parties. 'It's a proverbial game of Whack-a-Mole,' he said.
'File-sharing is a hydra: every time you cut the head off, it's
going to grow two more...'
"Maybe this new 'shared responsibility' between Napster
and the labels has the potential to spur some more positive developments.
(Entertainment lawyer Whitney) Broussard pondered, 'I wonder ultimately
if when these guys start really sitting down to figure out these
technological issues, they don't just sit there and look at each
other and say, "My God, why don't we just license this stuff,
it would be so much easier!"'"
Read the entire article here.
From Silicon Alley Daily: "You got the new Sadiohead?
"Starting tomorrow I suggest that everyone start renaming
their Napster files with a 'plus one' scheme on
the initial character. So, Metallica becomes Netallica and Eminem
becomes Fminem. Problem solved, let's all get back to stealing!
"In another six months when Napster and the music industry
fight over whether it is legal or illegal to ban searches by names
that are somehow related or derivative of real artist names (and
you thought the pregnant chad court testimony was absurd?), we can
all go to the 'plus two' scheme on the initial character and start
searching for the new Fido track."
Read this excellent essay by Jason McCabe Calacanis (on right,
with Broadcast.com founder Mark Cuban) here.
| xxx |
 |
|
Try
it out! Explore the wide world of
Internet audio by clicking the screenshot above.
|
|
|
.
|
.
|
|
|